What we're your kids' test scores? That plays a role in contextualizing academics. W&M is certainly in play, definitely ED or EDII. NYU and LACs reach down to lower GPAs if the test score is good + ED + full pay. Tufts and Boston College are very hard but not completely impossible. Your kids likely just weren't competitive applicants, I'm sorry to say. |
Kenyon also offers an excellent history department. |
3.5 is unlikely at W&M, even ED. |
My college kid did just fine PP, thanks for your concern, and I have no doubt their sibling will too. Mostly because we know the admissions game very very well. Have you ever looked at the CDS for any of these schools? Btw one of the things you will learn if you do is that GPA is uniformaly more important than test scores. Also OP, get yourself on Naviance or SCOIR or whatever system your school uses - that will help you determine where your kid is going to be competitive with a greater dose of reality than is sometimes the case here. |
Get off your high horse, please. I know the admissions game very well, but maybe my idea of a 3.5 w/ grade deflation is skewed because of the school my kids attended. There, a 3.5 w/ 1500+ can get you in anywhere in the list I provided. But I agree with your point about OP's school data. |
| Wesleyan? |
| If this student is male, his chances at a school such as Vassar might be enhanced. |
Agreed. |