|
My kid is at Dartmouth and the cost of attendance is $94k this year. The only students I know who are doing the 3-1-1 engineering program are either:
-on full aid or close to it -wealthy with unlimited money to spend Otherwise it's not realistic or smart for most to pay another $94K. It becomes an issue for traditional 4 year students at Dartmouth as well because it's hard to do the BS in engineering in 4 years there (that's another conversation). |
DC considered it as a back up plan because they wanted smallish classes, Engineering cohort of 300-1000 per year, under 15k undergrads. They used top LACs with 3-2 programs and Dartmouth(4+1) as a backup. Luckily got into many top 4yr engineering programs and is currently at an ivy. Now that they understand the main career paths for access to top engineering jobs, they understand that a physics major at a LAC then straight to engineering masters or phd is completely possible and acceptable, and allows one to stay at the same undergrad for 4 years. The mid-level 80k start/100k top-out engineer jobs, with no room for moving up to R&D or management without going back to school, are not what anyone at their ivy want. BSE alone and no plan for eventual phD or MSE or MBA is not common unless someone already has a startup idea and is working on VC during undergrad. |
In that these students will be expected to take math through multivariable calculus, linear algebra, and differential equations; at least two physics courses; and at least one course in chemistry and computer science at their liberal arts institutions, such a trajectory would not seem suitable for students perceived as being weak in STEM. |
You take liberal arts classes as electives. There's far more value to getting an MS in engineering instead of spending an extra year piddling around at a LAC. |
| DP - so does anyone know why college counselors recommend these programs if there are so many disadvantages? |
Nobody does these programs. If you want to be an engineer, be an engineer. |
The topic was asking about 3+2 programs, in which the student loses out on their senior year. The pp was talking about a program where the two years at the engineering program are split between the junior year and the post-senior year, which I’ve never seen, hence the question. |
Because they're not engineers, know nothing about becoming an engineer, and pride themselves in their knowledge of obscure college options. |
Engineering, Business, Medicine |
| If it includes a masters, yes. We talked to one school and you spent three years with them, two at another school and it made no sense as they did not offer the classes there so why even pretend. |
Information on such a program, including a link showing partner schools, appeared in the first reply. |
It’s way for these non engineering schools to try to market themselves since they can’t compete with the Top Engineering programs. The combined liberal arts and engineering thing is just silly |
[/b] Correct. I served in the board of my SKAC. It offers a 3-2 with Cal Tech but the truth is very few students take it in. The program exists only so the SLAc can say it offers engineering |
This. And a master's in engineering will be needed by most students because there is a glass ceiling without one. Folks targeting mgmt roles might get a MBA. Folks planning to stay technical usually get an engineering masters degree. Same applies to CS, btw. |
Sounds like a professional student uninterested in getting a real job. |