|
She is striking and beautiful in an unconventional way because of the long nose. I agree with others who called her stylish in an artsy kind of way. It is not a style that I covet but it’s still cool.
|
Those are photos from the shoot, with a stylist and clothes and shoes "on loan." I wouldn't assume any of this is her style, similar to any celeb photo shoot. |
This. She was wearing ceramic hands from an artist in the one pic. These are editorial looks. You are meant to take inspiration, so maybe you wear the dress she wore in one pic but style it differently. You are not meant to replicate entire looks for daywear, like a J. Crew catalog. |
Do some of you really think calling your husband a nickname is "insufferable"? Really? Also, begging the conservatives on this forum to stop bringing up Meghan Markle in threads that have nothing to do with her. |
I love it when DCUM’s self-designated “style mavens” lecture the rest of us about how things are “meant” to be taken. We know this. The editorial looks are hideous, regardless of who chose them. And obviously, she approved of them.
|
Huh? “The conservatives”? What does any of this have to do with being conservative/liberal? Rama Duwaji has terrible “style” and that isn’t a political statement. And yes, calling your husband by their first initial is incredibly grating and twee. |
I'm not a self-designated style maven, nor am I fan of Rama or her looks. I agree these editorial looks are ugly. I was correcting a previous poster that they are not indicative of her real-life style. (Although, I think her real life style is ugly too.) |
| Her husband has the IT factor. She does not. I read reports about how she does not want to be in his shadow. I don’t see the marriage lasting. He’s going to either use his celebrity to trader up or she’s going to “find” herself. |
| Yuck. With a Capital Y. |
| She's great. Really like her. |
| She'd be a cute boy. Otherwise, unconvincing. |