Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks wise, they are on a pretty similar level. Although he might be better looking if we had a picture of her natural face. Seems they both have money. No idea who either are. Why is this breakup post worthy? A random breakup of a influencer and her injured 3rd string NFLer.
You basically wrote the textbook "sorry, you are old and out of touch” comment. Your parents probably said the exact same thing in the 70s or 80s about whoever was on magazine covers, "who are these people and why is their breakup newsworthy.” You not knowing them does not make them random, it just means you are not the target audience anymore. Alix Earle literally started as a college girl filming "get ready with me” makeup routines in her messy U Miami bedroom, talking about acne and boy drama, and over just a few years that blew up into millions of followers, a hit podcast, products selling out when she mentions them, second place on Dancing With the Stars, a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit cover, and a Victoria’s Secret campaign as one of their new it girls. That is not "some influencer,” that is a major Gen Z celebrity. She is to Gen Z what Paris Hilton and the Kardashians were to millennials. You have heard of them, right, or do we need to go all the way back to Farrah Fawcett, Debbie Harry, Madonna, Burt Reynolds for it to click.
Looks wise, saying she is "average” just shows you are out of sync with what Gen Z is actually into. She basically is the current Gen Z template: the face, the styling, the body type, the whole vibe that a lot of younger girls are literally copying on social media. That does not mean everyone has to like it, but pretending it is nothing special is like calling Farrah Fawcett’s hair "whatever” in the 70s. It is the iconic look of right now, and you sounding confused by it is kind of like still arguing bush vs Brazilian as if beauty trends have not completely shifted since your heyday.
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
