DP. Stanford is the same they don’t value entrepreneurship. It’s probably worse because there’s a misperception that they would, and too many take that tact. They only have a graduate business department. I understand he wants CS but it comes off like he doesn’t know the school he’s applying to. |
TASP is still really good with a vast majority of participants going to Ivies. It just knows its focus. |
I can’t quite tell from your message what he is most worried about, getting into Stanford, the longevity of his project, or AI. I’m not sure if he also has so many messages mixed together but I’d be crisper about what is most important here. His academic stats are good, but so is everyone applying to those schools. Transparently the impact story with 1,000 users is not that compelling, especially in light of the effort he has devoted to this. I would rapidly shift to encouraging him to fall in love with more schools. I think as a parent it is worse for kids when we buy into their intense “one perfect true match” vision. Lots of kids have dreams that don’t work out the way they hope. Those kids survive, yours will too if Stanford doesn’t happen. If you keep calm it will help your child. |
|
This is duplicate thread.
"https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1283741.page" |
If he’s dreaming big, then he shouldn’t be worried about rejection. Lots of people who dream big will be rejected because most people don’t dream as big and may not understand the potential. He shouldn’t be focused on any particular school, but rather his ability to describe and show his passion and dreams. Someone will accept him, even if it’s not Stanford. |
| Entrepreneurship is 90% people skills. He should keep that in mind. |
|
Just FYI…but Berkeley historically places a premium on kids that demonstrate the ability to become financially successful and appreciate entrepreneurs.
Penn is also a bit more overt in wanting those types as well. |
learning how to code is learning how to think. you can use an ai to skimp out on the first part, but then you'll never learn the second part. also, some people actually like coding. liking things?? on this forum?? shocking, i know. |
DP. The statement was each middle school kids and seniors to code Is that senior citizens? If they haven't gotten to the second part, well maybe skimping works. |
This is true in our family's experience too. I went to a HYPSM (and got into others in this group). I was an alternate in a program akin to a state dept study abroad program that was very competitive. DS is at a selective LAC. He had state wide recognition from the Governor's school summer program in our state. |
You don't know how to prepare your child for adversity/rejection? Hes obviously a numbers person. For fall 2024 admission, Stanford had 57,000 applicants. 2,000 were accepted. |
AI has nothing to do with the concerns his application will bring elite AOs: 1. implies he has less than top grades in other areas, not good for Ivy/stanford/MIT range 2. over 1550 superscore after FIVE times is not a true top 1% kid. He will be competing against all of those and will likely struggle to be top half if he were to get in. Most likely the AOs will figure out he is not a true top kid somewhere else in his apps (the less than top grades across the board, his AP scores are likely not straight 5s from your descripion 3. while his coding program and business sound as though they could be great, something about your description makes it seem as though he would not want to interact with classmates, be open to new ideas, find college meaningful enough to stay. In sum our DC went to high school with a couple similar students, one was close to VAL one was not even top10%, Both had top rigor in stem. Both had some mildly lackluster grade/score/class choice outside of stem that indicated a minor issue in non-stem compared to top peers. Both had very similar unidimensional EC related to writing code and obsession with it. Lower ranked one did not get in to any T25 and the other one got into Umich and GT OOS but flat rejected every ivy and stanford, though they did not ED and Cornell ED may have worked for them. This is a private that sends 3-4 kids to IVY/MIT/stanford unhooked every year (and a few more hooked). The top schools picked the students who had the straight 5s, super high raw intelligence, easily above 1530 one sitting first try, and were driven and had impactful ECs but were not unidimensional. Take this with a grain of salt maybe he is in a feeder school that sends 10-15% to ivy + your student will make the cut. high school matters a lot. Ask his college counseling dean. |
| ^Adding the 3 who got into ivy/stanford unhooked were also stem kids and also got in to Umich and GT OOS which are no slouch but not what the very top chases at our school |
NO. He needs to focus on his non-stem classes and being human and relatable. |
I'm pp. Your child sounds driven and brilliant and wonderful. There are lots of driven and brilliant and wonderful people with incredible accomplishments who will not gain acceptance to the school of their choice. I genuinely think therapy now, before all of the decisions come out, is critical. What may be the worst case scenario is that he does go to Stanford and realizes that he worked so hard for something that isn't a magic key to happiness. He needs to engage in something other than a goal that is not in his realm of control. |