Lol wrong most new homes are built 10000% better because of Required building codes and inspections. Old homes are terrible and exempt from safety codes |
Nothing charming about musty old quaint homes. BTDT |
Ghosts and money pit
plumbing inadequate |
Yes I find this interesting because in many cases, people will put a lot of effort into lead remediating in an old home (or one that was built before the 1920s) because you immediately think/worry about lead for a “historic” house. But lead didn’t go away all that long ago! So millions and millions of people live in “newer” homes and have no idea of their lead exposure— either in the paint or the plumbing or the soldering. |
So jealous!! I’d love to live in an old home. |
Shitshacj |
I like our old home but it is expensive sometimes and you have to be willing to live with imperfections. Flips around here tend to focus on the visible stuff and ignore the expensive structural/behind the walls issues but I’m sure that isn’t universal. |
Old homes have better bones that is why they are still around after hundreds of years. On the other hand new homes have better electrical, insulation and probably plumbing. |
You plan to chew the windowsills? All old houses will have lead paint. |
This. Also LOL at the people ITT underplaying lead paint. Read Lead Safe Mama’s blog. Lead is no joke. I have a gorgeous new build in the Potomac area and wouldn’t have it any other way. |
Tell us you know nothing about construction by being really obviuos that you know nothing. Some things have improved, but many things have gotten cheaper and worse. |
Yup. And so do the yards/dirt of all houses older than 40 years. |
Sounds like a quack. |
OP: how did the house viewing go yesterday? |
And every old(er) house is in danger of catastrophic fires and collapse? ![]() Building codes and inspections - eh. Been in and out of old and new houses to know this is near meaningless and only those with a blind faith makes this important. Will say new houses will have better efficiency, but a well built older houses will have better materials. I have seen fabulously built new houses (at a premium, they are not cheap) but most standard new builds are just that, standard to mediocre. OP is looking at a 1940s house, which by the standards of historic old houses is not historic by any stretch of the imagination and is most likely a brick box thrown up by the thousands around DC to meet the demands of a growing civil service population. Unless it's one of the better and bigger variety, it will be solidly built out of the mass produced materials of the time (which itself will be quite solid and durable). It's how the house was maintained, renovated, whether it had the dreaded flip, that matters. An excellent home inspector is important. |