Greta Thunberg "I have been kidnappped"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At least she is trying to do something instead of just watching children die. Israel is not going to get away from their crimes.

Better ask Hakeem about that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Another attention seeking leftist

What are you doing to help starving and dying children? Miserable Maga soul.

+1

They eat their hatred.

Hmmm...you don't sound exactly balanced yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:By their own admission they were trying to “raise awareness” and the small amount of aid they had onboard was “symbolic” and not enough to actually do anything.

Her PR committee told her to do it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Reminder: they were in international water, were not carrying weapons and were transporting only aid supplies like baby formula. The flag the ship bore was the Union Jack; stopping a British boat in International Waters, detaining the people and stealing the items on board is illegal.

UK is not going to do anything.

[Anonymous]

Gideon Levy of Haartez explains why Greta is such a danger to Israel:

Because activists could serve as journalists documenting and revealing Gaza’s destruction, and it is the first conflict in which international journalists have not been allowed to enter for more than 20 months.

Thus, it would disrupt Israel's blackout of media reporting in which over 200 journalists and their families have been systematically targeted and assassinated.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKr4DHfB8qR/
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKrd012Ilhi/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Reminder: they were in international water, were not carrying weapons and were transporting only aid supplies like baby formula. The flag the ship bore was the Union Jack; stopping a British boat in International Waters, detaining the people and stealing the items on board is illegal.

Yaaaaaaawwwwwnnnnnn . . . . .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Too bad she's not at the bottom of the sea.

But you are the same person talking about the hostages. You are the reason we no longer care.

[Anonymous]

If Greta could find a husband, she could focus on things that matter and are relevant to her life instead of a hostile group of Sharia Law fetishists.

Anyone want to “take one for the team” and propose marriage to Miss Thang?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too bad she's not at the bottom of the sea.

But you are the same person talking about the hostages. You are the reason we no longer care.

Nah, she's just a waste of oxygen.

[Anonymous]

Yawn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So weird how you all are triggered by a girl trying to deliver humanitarian assistance (or at least trying to call attention to the lack of humanitarian assistance)

She is hysterical and annoying, and she isn’t a girl. She is 22. Don’t infantalize her.

“Girl” isn’t infantilizing— I mean charli xcx is 32– but in any case the hysterical (and annoying) one here seems to be you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:By their own admission they were trying to “raise awareness” and the small amount of aid they had onboard was “symbolic” and not enough to actually do anything.

Her PR committee told her to do it.

TBF: she is autistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Another attention seeking leftist

What are you doing to help starving and dying children? Miserable Maga soul.

I'm urging the Palestinians to reject Hamas, Hezbollah, and other counterproductive terror groups in utterly futile efforts to turn the clock back to 1947 when they could have had their own state.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reminder: they were in international water, were not carrying weapons and were transporting only aid supplies like baby formula. The flag the ship bore was the Union Jack; stopping a British boat in International Waters, detaining the people and stealing the items on board is illegal.

Yaaaaaaawwwwwnnnnnn . . . . .

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reminder: they were in international water, were not carrying weapons and were transporting only aid supplies like baby formula. The flag the ship bore was the Union Jack; stopping a British boat in International Waters, detaining the people and stealing the items on board is illegal.

Yaaaaaaawwwwwnnnnnn . . . . .

+1