Dept of Ed is revoking Columbia's accreditation

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people think Columbia and Harvard can violate civil rights laws and get away with it. You all just agree with them because you hate Jews, but legally this is no different from segregationists in Alabama back in the day. And they sent the Army to sort that out, so Columbia and Harvard seem to be getting off easy.


I don't know why you think you can go 5 miles over the speed limit and not end up in jail.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people think Columbia and Harvard can violate civil rights laws and get away with it. You all just agree with them because you hate Jews, but legally this is no different from segregationists in Alabama back in the day. And they sent the Army to sort that out, so Columbia and Harvard seem to be getting off easy.

Exactly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people think Columbia and Harvard can violate civil rights laws and get away with it. You all just agree with them because you hate Jews, but legally this is no different from segregationists in Alabama back in the day. And they sent the Army to sort that out, so Columbia and Harvard seem to be getting off easy.


What laws did Columbia and Harvard violate? Is there a law that schools must admit a former president’s spawn?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people think Columbia and Harvard can violate civil rights laws and get away with it. You all just agree with them because you hate Jews, but legally this is no different from segregationists in Alabama back in the day. And they sent the Army to sort that out, so Columbia and Harvard seem to be getting off easy.


That’s not a comparison that I, personally, would make, but, in my case it’s because the current administration seems to be extremely selective about when and how and probably why they decide which civil rights laws to vigorously enforce.
Right up there with encouraging white Afrikaaners to come to the US, while deporting POC — without appropriate due process. Whatever the goals are here, civil rights and justice for all don’t seem to be among them.
Anonymous
I bet Columbia University is quaking in its Ivy League patent leather evening shoes! Trump is a fool.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people think Columbia and Harvard can violate civil rights laws and get away with it. You all just agree with them because you hate Jews, but legally this is no different from segregationists in Alabama back in the day. And they sent the Army to sort that out, so Columbia and Harvard seem to be getting off easy.


What laws did Columbia and Harvard violate? Is there a law that schools must admit a former president’s spawn?


The law they violated was protecting the constitution namely freedom of speech and assembly. Pro Palestinian rights is hate speech and anti semitism, and pro terrorism according to the Zionists and their handmaidens in the White House
Anonymous
So the Feds does not do accreditation. The DOE recognizes the accreditation of the agencies and states.

This will be very hard to do given that it is not a federal responsibility and the DOE does not exist any more.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people think Columbia and Harvard can violate civil rights laws and get away with it. You all just agree with them because you hate Jews, but legally this is no different from segregationists in Alabama back in the day. And they sent the Army to sort that out, so Columbia and Harvard seem to be getting off easy.


Exactly, these universities have enacted what essentially constitutes to on campus apartheid. Jewish students suffer extraordinary racism, hostility violence and have even been blocked from taking certain entrances, buildings, and walkways that pro-Palestinian students have stolen and occupied. But don't worry, the ADL is carefully documenting each and every single Jew hating and antisemitic event and the evil people will soon be brought to justice in criminal courts.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people think Columbia and Harvard can violate civil rights laws and get away with it. You all just agree with them because you hate Jews, but legally this is no different from segregationists in Alabama back in the day. And they sent the Army to sort that out, so Columbia and Harvard seem to be getting off easy.


I’m Jewish, and I think what the administration is doing here is (a) un-American, (b) illegal, and (c) also bad for the Jews.
Anonymous
There is a lawsuit that was recently given the greenlight to go to trial. The plaintiffs are several Jewish and Israeli Columbia students and they are suing some of the free Palestine groups at Columbia claiming that these groups are actually a propaganda front for Hamas propaganda --meaning they actually have direct ties and operational support from Hamas, not just ideological alignment.

Anyway, I could be wrong but I think this action by the DoE is in relation to the evidence being presented in the lawsuit.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:There is a lawsuit that was recently given the greenlight to go to trial. The plaintiffs are several Jewish and Israeli Columbia students and they are suing some of the free Palestine groups at Columbia claiming that these groups are actually a propaganda front for Hamas propaganda --meaning they actually have direct ties and operational support from Hamas, not just ideological alignment.

Anyway, I could be wrong but I think this action by the DoE is in relation to the evidence being presented in the lawsuit.


If this is true, is it something the Columbia admin could have known about? Is not suing the groups directly the appropriate action?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people think Columbia and Harvard can violate civil rights laws and get away with it. You all just agree with them because you hate Jews, but legally this is no different from segregationists in Alabama back in the day. And they sent the Army to sort that out, so Columbia and Harvard seem to be getting off easy.


Stop trying to make Jews look bad
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:There is a lawsuit that was recently given the greenlight to go to trial. The plaintiffs are several Jewish and Israeli Columbia students and they are suing some of the free Palestine groups at Columbia claiming that these groups are actually a propaganda front for Hamas propaganda --meaning they actually have direct ties and operational support from Hamas, not just ideological alignment.

Anyway, I could be wrong but I think this action by the DoE is in relation to the evidence being presented in the lawsuit.


I strongly suspect these groups are a propaganda front and being funded by Hamas which are indirectly funded by Qatar which is in turn, indirectly funded by Netanyahu. These "free Palestine" groups can then generate antisemitism needed to destroy speech against Israel.

Netanyahu is once again demonstrating how brilliant of a tactician he is. He even just boldly proclaimed that saying “Free Palestine” is the “modern equivalent to ‘Heil Hitler’.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There is a lawsuit that was recently given the greenlight to go to trial. The plaintiffs are several Jewish and Israeli Columbia students and they are suing some of the free Palestine groups at Columbia claiming that these groups are actually a propaganda front for Hamas propaganda --meaning they actually have direct ties and operational support from Hamas, not just ideological alignment.

Anyway, I could be wrong but I think this action by the DoE is in relation to the evidence being presented in the lawsuit.


If this is true, is it something the Columbia admin could have known about? Is not suing the groups directly the appropriate action?


They are suing the groups directly. It's separate but related.

There were campus protests everywhere but the stuff happening at Columbia was next level. The DoE is arguing that Columbia should lose its accreditation bc it allowed these groups to operate and failed to protect Jewish students. I posted a link to the DoE press release up thread.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don't know why people think Columbia and Harvard can violate civil rights laws and get away with it. You all just agree with them because you hate Jews, but legally this is no different from segregationists in Alabama back in the day. And they sent the Army to sort that out, so Columbia and Harvard seem to be getting off easy.


What civil rights laws violations have they gotten away with? Be specific.


Go read the letters yourself. The specific instances of civil rights violations are described. If Harvard and Columbia think they are being falsely accused, they should defend themselves in court. But I don't know how they think they can get away with race-based admissions standards, and sending an email (written evidence, omg) to Jewish students that they won't be able to protect them from hate crimes on campus. You can't get away with this behavior in America.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: