Most Americans do not own two homes. Buying an investment property is not something "middle class" families regularly do, unless you have the DCUM definition of middle class being anyone with an income under 400K/year. |
I am OP. The post you quoted is also me. I thought it was clear but I should have said. Between my income and the survivor benefits my kids get our family income is around 100K, which is below the median for a family our size in the state where we live. I have about $400K equity. If I leave that out of the net price calculators they say we would get need based aid at our state schools. |
All of this is unfair. Financial aid is not free. It's funded by others previously donating to the school, or those paying full price. |
$400-500k at what point? Our home in ffx co has gone up 40% in value since we bought it more than 15 years ago. We could not afford to buy it now. So do we get dinged for the housing market when we actually made a frugal choice? |
That has to be the dumbest comment I've heard. I could sell my home today and factoring in the cost to sell that home, I might have enough to pay for 2 years of college. And then, where the hell am I supposed to live? In the street? In a crappy rental apartment that would cost more than my mortgage? |
NP nope, but I grew up in Iowa where my grandparents owned a rental and my parents owned a rental. neither owned a stock in their lives. it's actually more common than you might imagine (imagine!) |
nope. I feel like I'm going to post this every time now bcs it's so annoying to me. full pay does not subsidize FA at all. it costs yale 140k a year per students. ALL students are subsidized, and this is true up and down the selectivity level. Universities are helped by the donor class to some minor extend, but mostly by the tax benefits from the community and state, funding from governments, million-billionaire donations, and slow and steady gains over a century plus in investments include in the stock market. |
you should get dinged exactly the same way someone who gave up some luxury to invest in apple stock 15 years ago. |
I would hope your child would get aid. Apply around to a bunch of colleges and see. $400K equity in a house is very different than $400K savings with retirement and lots of other stuff. Remember here people call themselves middle class with 2-4 times that income. Just explain the situation that you bought the house married, spouse passed away, went to live with family as they needed a caretaker and kept the house as you will need to move back into it one day when relative passes. |
400-500K 15 years ago was a lot of money. |
No one is expecting you to sell the house. Stop being dramatic. |
So you can run your home as a business and deduct several things a homeowner cannot: mileage, repairs, etc. Clearly, you're being coy about where you currently live because who would pay far market rent AND do some caretaking without there being more to the story? Typically it would be caretaking in lieu of rent or in lieu of market rent. One doesn't take care of a landlord in a home without something out of it (relationship connection, money, etc). Perhaps the person you are caring for is paying for private school for your kid or something else (vehicle, etc.) but no one moves out of their home, rents it, moves in with a stranger to take care of them for no benefit at all, and then pays more to live in two bedrooms in someone else's home than they would in the home they already own (and take less in rent than their monthly two bedrooms cost) so they are at a loss every month...unless the story has holes that you're not filling in on purpose. |
That’s not at all what happened. |
It's a "loophole" that doesn't need to be fixed because it doesn't happen. No one is going to put $10 million cash into a house and live on poverty level income so they can get financial aid for their kid (not to mention that most of your income would go for the upkeep of your $10 million house). If you have $10 million, you pay tuition. The real issue here is people who have modest incomes and own a home that has greatly appreciated in value. *Some* colleges (not all) have made a policy decision that they are not going to encourage people to sell or borrow against their home to pay college expenses. You may not agree with that, but it's not hard to understand why they made that decision. It's also pretty clear why income producing property wouldn't be excepted. If you start making exceptions for homes that are not residences, where does that stop? Several people have given OP the advice to call the university and explain the situation and see what they say, which is really the only thing to do. |
Clearly your situation is fairly complex and uncommon. No one here can help you without a lot of detail that you (reasonably) don’t want to provide here. CALL THE SCHOOL. |