Is that really too much for you to read?? We really are living in Idiocracy... |
+1. I always thought that Sanders was a friend of Vlad, and now I’m starting to think Warren is, too. Instead of focusing on the threat Putin poses, they try to divide us by focusing on issues that divide broke, mostly powerless, progressive from anyone who has any power or money. Sanders focuses on trying to chase all rich people away from the Democrats. Warren specializes in making real estate agents, insurance agents and other people with big lobbying organizations hate the Democrats. OK, once Trump is out of the White House, go be Marxist. Today, take the threat Trump poses seriously. Unite all people who oppose him against him. The moderate Democrats in Congress are messing this up by not doing much at all, but progressives working to push the Democrats to the left and narrow their base are bad, too. Anyone pushing away anyone who opposes Trump right now is not taking the current crisis seriously enough. |
These were all poison pill amendments that were designed to kill a very focused reconciliation bill. None of those topics are the subject of the bill. |
Yes, thank you for the work, OP! This evil clown car rodeo is so beyond tolerating. So very gross. |
Don’t be silly. This is detail on what the GOP supports or doesn’t support spend tax dollars on. Spend on billionaires and cut everything else. The budget is very much the focus of a reconciliation bill. |
The bill is for border security, military fund8ng and energy policy. It doesn’t include the tax cuts. |
Omg you are so dumb. Listen to cnbc closing bell Friday all about how deporting illegals will increase housing costs. They provide the labor dummy! CNBC loves trump so you should be able to tolerate their facts |
It's a list -- not a manifesto. Someone needs a dictionary. |
Failed rebuttal. Try harder. How are they not relevant to the subject of the bill, when the subject of the bill was to define the parameters and guidelines of the budget bill? Things like taking Medicare and SNAP cuts off the table are VERY DIRECTLY relevant to that, and are not in the least "poisonous" given those have had strong bipartisan support in the past. If anyone's trying to poison anything it's Trump and the current Republican majority poisoning things that have historically always had bipartisan support. |
Wrong. Currently, House Republicans have the tax cuts in their bill. Also, if it's for energy policy then how do they reconcile gutting support for solar and wind power? That's going to drive energy costs up rather than lowering costs. |