Scientific proof of Adam and Eve

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thanks for demonstrating (again) why religion and science shouldn’t mix, OP.

Science and religion don't mix because science continues to erode those bronze-age explanations for how the natural world operates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Archaeologists have found indications that the Garden of Eden was not just a mythical location but also the cradle of human civilization. Meanwhile, biologists assert that all humans share a common ancestor.

The Garden of Eden is believed to have been located in ancient Mesopotamia, which today comprises much of Iraq and parts of Syria, Iran, and Turkey.“

We're all from Africa not Mesopotamia.

[Anonymous]

I'm really glad that I found this thread after the OP had been thoroughly debunked.

THanks, Guys.

[Anonymous]

Eden no.

Eve however, was "real", just not like the story goes.

All humans alive today are descendants from just one woman. The last full "bottleneck" that has occurred globally in human evolution.

"Mitochondrial Eve" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thanks for demonstrating (again) why religion and science shouldn’t mix, OP.

Science and religion don't mix because science continues to erode those bronze-age explanations for how the natural world operates.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is fascinating. Also proof of Garden of Eden.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/scient...cid=sapphireappshare

Hahaha… no wonder you are a …

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course Adam and Eve existed! At some point, we evolved from gorillas and those first two gorilla-humans had to have names!

If gorillas evolved in humans, why are there still gorillas?

Because the environment influences evolution. If certain gorillas remain in their comfortable mountain homes, maybe they don't evolve as quickly as those who were forced to move on, reproduce with other lowland gorillas and adapt to a changing climate. Did you miss 7th grade biology?

NP.
Gorillas didn't evolve into humans; gorillas and humans have a common ancestor. That is a big difference! It means that if you evolved from a gorilla, you are de facto not a homo sapien. But you've also made up an imaginary narrative to support your unscientific statement regarding human origins, which is also what young earth creationists do. Y'all are playing for the same team.

The "common ancestor" doesnt exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Archaeologists have found indications that the Garden of Eden was not just a mythical location but also the cradle of human civilization. Meanwhile, biologists assert that all humans share a common ancestor.

The Garden of Eden is believed to have been located in ancient Mesopotamia, which today comprises much of Iraq and parts of Syria, Iran, and Turkey.“

We're all from Africa not Mesopotamia.

Mesopotamia is closer to the center of the world. It makes more sense that from there, Europe, Africa, Asia were settled by the first humans.

It also makes sense that the biggest world religions came from this same region. The ME is in the middle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Archaeologists have found indications that the Garden of Eden was not just a mythical location but also the cradle of human civilization. Meanwhile, biologists assert that all humans share a common ancestor.

The Garden of Eden is believed to have been located in ancient Mesopotamia, which today comprises much of Iraq and parts of Syria, Iran, and Turkey.“

We're all from Africa not Mesopotamia.

Mesopotamia is closer to the center of the world. It makes more sense that from there, Europe, Africa, Asia were settled by the first humans.

It also makes sense that the biggest world religions came from this same region. The ME is in the middle.

This is your theory based on…feelings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thanks for demonstrating (again) why religion and science shouldn’t mix, OP.

Science and religion don't mix because science continues to erode those bronze-age explanations for how the natural world operates.

They don't mix because both have become religious nonsense.

it used to be Science was fact based, but that is no longer the case in the last decade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thanks for demonstrating (again) why religion and science shouldn’t mix, OP.

Science and religion don't mix because science continues to erode those bronze-age explanations for how the natural world operates.

They don't mix because both have become religious nonsense.

it used to be Science was fact based, but that is no longer the case in the last decade.

Go away, pos bigot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is fascinating. Also proof of Garden of Eden.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/scient...cid=sapphireappshare

Scientific doesn’t mean what you think it does

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Adam and Eve were monkeys. Anyone who believes in the garden of Eden is brainwashed.

Or poorly educated in their own faith even. Very few biblical faiths view the Book of Genesis as other than allegory.