This. Have been reading this forum for years (two DCs currently in college) and have noticed that people seem to think applying ED means that the schools admit kids with lower stats simply because they committed to come and that’s just not true. You still have to prove you are an exceptional candidate (for the top schools) and even then there’s a bit of a dice roll. The bottom line is—If your DC has a clear cut top choice, apply to that school ED and work with your CC to confirm that they are actually good candidates for that school. Re the SLACs, I can’t speak to whether ED actively HURTS non athletes, but it is true a substantial number of athletes come through via the ED round. Other DC |
Thanks for the links. I had no idea WashU admits 72% of their class ED. |
| PP said UVA, but I don’t think ED is an advantage at UVA at all. Also, EA looks like it is an advantage over RD, but it also might just be a reflection of the applicant pool. RD students are usually on more of an “upward trend” grade wise and hoping to submit senior grades, so maybe not as strong of a candidate as the EA candidates. |
I’m pretty sure that Wake does not have a significant ED bump. I remember looking their stats up on their common data set a while back and was surprised. Maybe it has changed? |
There are a lot of schools that fill their freshmen class with a majority of ED admits. Emory, Colby, Wesleyan, BC, Northeastern, Dartmouth, Northwestern, Vanderbilt, Johns Hopkins etc. This is the dirty little open secret as they say, if Yogi Berra were around. |
Emory gets picked on a lot when WashU is an easier admit. |