There was no inaccuracy. The article said 20 percent of the Emory class was premed after two years. |
The inaccuracy I was alluding to was a claim that said WashU wasn’t more pre-med/phd than Emory. |
| W&M Rice Tufts WashU BC |
| On the reach-y side- Cornell, Penn, Michigan, Duke |
| What about UMiami? |
| In NY - Emory/Tulane/Wash U are the classic triumvirate for smart wealthy Jewish kids. They ED to one of them. |
Overall I agree with you. Just want to add that Tufts has lots of pre-mba type kids too. It has an excellent Econ department and very active finance clubs that place kids well. |
They are not peer schools, Emory is a level above. |
|
They have similar amounts of premed students, both have around 400 apply to med school every year |
|
Nice sneaking Michigan in there. It's not a reach, compared to Emory. |
Keep in mind the original question was about which one leaned more preprofessional vs pre md/phd. If you’re saying Emory has more pre md/phd vibes, you’re saying Washu is relatively more preprofessional. To most people, that’s not really a reasonable statement. |
Premed is pre-professional. |
+1 Michigan certainly is the outlier there. our Scoir indicates UMICH is about as competitive as Emory, slightly less competitive than UNC OOS and UCLA OOS (5 kids per year get into each with a lot of Mich overlap), and Mich is FAR less competitive than ivies/Stan/Duke, even with cornell being the relatively easy ivy it still is harder than mich. |