This is a good situation to be in - it means he has options. |
| My DH went to a school ranked near 150. He is very successful. He doesn’t want our kids to go to a T20. |
I worked with a valedictorian who was rejected from every excellent college she applied to. She was stellar in her thinking and work ethic, had a great sense of humor and was a collaborative colleague. Truly rare in these regards. Maybe her high school didn’t support her, maybe they didn’t know how to advise her. Maybe it was really bad luck. I don’t know what wrong. She’s fine; people like this find their way. That’s why valedictorians wind up at 50-125 schools. |
OP here and my ds is not valedictorian (not sure why this poster thought he was!) He is top 10% at a very large high school. Some good students at his school got deferred/denied from the school this post is about. Our issue is our flagship is where every great in-state student wants to go, often over Ivies or prestigious private schools. Then other school is a theoretical target, but has become competitive. Even this school he got into is now difficult to get into. |
The money is a big assumption here. I was valedictorian and I went to our in-state flagship (ranked in the 80s) for free with a stipend over the T20 I got into which claimed to meet 100% of financial need but offered me (with my project manager dad and stay-at-home mom) a whopping $1k a year. It wasn’t a hard choice. |
+1 |
Did he apply to Vtech? |
+1 Many of us who went to more selective schools during the 1990’s have had to deal with this issue and accept the current landscape. Glad things are working out well for your son! My kid looked at schools that I may never have considered for myself 30 years ago and it was a good eye-opener for me to see the world of opportunity outside T-50. |
Ms. Valedictorian, your first sentence makes no sense. |
I’m glad to hear this. Sounds like the school knows what they are doing. My spouse works at a small school, and they focus on job placement for an area where they specialize. This is a smart strategy for a school. |
Yes. He applied to uva, wm, Va tech and jmu. Rejected from uva, admitted for spring semester WM, waitlisted but never got off the waitlist for Va tech, and accepted at jmu. The issue we think was him applying as a business major, not being first gen, and not being an URM, and being from a top nova high school and being male, all did not work in favor for Va tech. His friends with lower stats got in to Va tech but not as business majors. For the business school for his demographics, I think he needed like a 4.2w and like a 1450+ gpa. He’s happy now at a great OOS public business school program. |
| Anonymous, so being truthful. If my very good student ended up at a school in the 100-150 range I would not be thrilled. I could deal with up to about 75. Indiana University and the like. |
|
Parent of an ultra high stats kid. If I’m being totally honest…this would not bother me even a tiny bit. It wouldn’t even cross my mind to be upset about it.
She can be successful as a big fish in a small pond or a small fish in a big pond. She does not require everyone at the school to be in competition with her or to be her “intellectual equal” in order to have a good experience. Realistically she’ll probably have less pressure and more opportunities (research, etc) if she goes a tier down. And if undergrad is free, that just opens up more opportunities for grad school or to start her life with a bigger safety net. |
I know it’s a red state but Alabama is perfect for kids like this - they throw money and research opportunities to ultra high stats kids |
+1. This is how I see it too. |