Candace Owens banned from Australia

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, countries can limit who gets to cross their borders? Is that even legal?

The Biden administration deported 1,100,000 foreign aliens last year alone.

What are you prattling about?

Compared to the 12 million he and Harris let in, 1.1 million are small potatoes.

Yeah can you believe Trump interfered with the legislation to deal with that just for his own political gain? Disgusting and shows how little he actually cares about the issue except as a political one beneficial to him. On point for a raging narcissist without a drop of patriotism in his body.

The legislation that was dropped was going to allow 1.8 million illegal aliens to cross the border every year. That is not border control but a migration plan.

Wait this bipartisan bill would have reduced the number of illegal crossings by A LOT and you’re saying Trump still stopped it simply because it wasn’t down to zero?? One couldn’t have improved the situation immediately just because that wouldn’t be good for Trump?!!!!?

Ps asking for asylum isn’t illegal. In case you were ignorant of that fact.

Crossing the border in between ports of entry is illegal. And the “asylum seekers” are purely economic migrants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a soft spot for Candace but she's definitely staking her territory in the extreme fringe. She used to be more of a conservative contrarian. Then she got a taste of being a firebrand and can't quit it. So she's resorting to ever increasing extremism-- I honestly think she's looking to fill the void left by Alex Jones. In the past year, she's said enough nutty stuff to get axed from Daily Wire, demonetized from YouTube, and distanced from most of the right wing. Most countries do not have the free speech protections that we have and she may well not meet Australia's requirements.

I agree with this. She's the worst kind of provocateur.

I know she doesn't think she was saying antisemitic things. She kept saying all her friends and her former fiance that she lived with and her mentor were all Jewish. But she was only saying that stuff to bolster her credentials for saying antisemitic things. DW was right to sack her. She also has been increasingly saying crazy things like "Why is the media covering up the fact that Emmanuel Macrons older wife is transgender?!" I mean... what? It's fun and tabloidy and sensationalistic but it removes her from the world of serious commentary.

Ha ha! I'm French, I know the Macrons, and his wife is most definitely a naturally born woman. He, on the other hand, likes men

This Owens person is just not credible, and if she says hateful and untrue things, a ban is the right decision.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I'd love to think that one day, American politicians will have an easy time identifying and opposing Nazis, too.

So Dems are all-in now on the “call everyone you don’t like a ‘nazi’ “ thing, eh?

What happened? Was “Joy!” not working out?

Australia is a country and is not a member of the Democratic Party.

Talk about low information.

[Anonymous]

Trump surrounds himself with Nazis but he is great for Israel? Wonder if Israel would banned a Trump’s people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, it’s cool when they ban people we don’t like/don’t agree with, but what happens when they ban folks from our team?

ICYMI: Trump and the right wing orgs that support him have already begun making lists. Do we really want to live in a country or a world where people are canceled, censored, locked up, etc. based on their opinions? I don’t.

Did you just time travel here from 1991?
Dems created that world here, circa 2009.

Sure, but Trump and his cronies will perfect it by rounding up people, locking them up, destroying their businesses, etc.

Have you seen the list of “targets” posted on a conservative site seemingly aimed at dismantling large swaths of the federal government? They list federal employees and label them as targets based on their campaign donations, social media posts, upholding the law, etc.

WTAF are you talking about? Provide credible citations.
NP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, it’s cool when they ban people we don’t like/don’t agree with, but what happens when they ban folks from our team?

ICYMI: Trump and the right wing orgs that support him have already begun making lists. Do we really want to live in a country or a world where people are canceled, censored, locked up, etc. based on their opinions? I don’t.

Did you just time travel here from 1991?
Dems created that world here, circa 2009.

Sure, but Trump and his cronies will perfect it by rounding up people, locking them up, destroying their businesses, etc.

Have you seen the list of “targets” posted on a conservative site seemingly aimed at dismantling large swaths of the federal government? They list federal employees and label them as targets based on their campaign donations, social media posts, upholding the law, etc.

Where do you people come up with this garbage?

+100
Amazing that no one even blinks an eye at this BS anymore. It’s pretty obvious the left has a monopoly on those low-information voters they love to bray about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, countries can limit who gets to cross their borders? Is that even legal?

I am LOLing at the irony of this post
- White supremacy of banning a black woman ✔️
- Enforcing borders like white supremacists ✔️
- Shutting down black voices like a white supremacist ✔️

And democrats and liberals are cheering. ✔️

So true! Can you imagine the reaction if say, Malcom X (an ACTUAL antisemite) had ever been banned? They’d be exploding with their usual racism outrage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, countries can limit who gets to cross their borders? Is that even legal?

The Biden administration deported 1,100,000 foreign aliens last year alone.

What are you prattling about?

Compared to the 12 million he and Harris let in, 1.1 million are small potatoes.

Yeah can you believe Trump interfered with the legislation to deal with that just for his own political gain? Disgusting and shows how little he actually cares about the issue except as a political one beneficial to him. On point for a raging narcissist without a drop of patriotism in his body.

The legislation that was dropped was going to allow 1.8 million illegal aliens to cross the border every year. That is not border control but a migration plan.

Wait this bipartisan bill would have reduced the number of illegal crossings by A LOT and you’re saying Trump still stopped it simply because it wasn’t down to zero?? One couldn’t have improved the situation immediately just because that wouldn’t be good for Trump?!!!!?

Ps asking for asylum isn’t illegal. In case you were ignorant of that fact.

Crossing the border in between ports of entry is illegal. And the “asylum seekers” are purely economic migrants.

+1
Even Joe Biden, who insisted for 3 years that there was “no crisis at the border,” finally stopped lying and signed an EO that tightens up the standards for asylum. Funny that he didn’t take action upon taking office instead of waiting for an election year to roll around. The crisis he caused could have been fixed much earlier.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I'd love to think that one day, American politicians will have an easy time identifying and opposing Nazis, too.

Everyone knows Nazis are black.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, countries can limit who gets to cross their borders? Is that even legal?

The Biden administration deported 1,100,000 foreign aliens last year alone.

What are you prattling about?

Compared to the 12 million he and Harris let in, 1.1 million are small potatoes.

Yeah can you believe Trump interfered with the legislation to deal with that just for his own political gain? Disgusting and shows how little he actually cares about the issue except as a political one beneficial to him. On point for a raging narcissist without a drop of patriotism in his body.

The legislation that was dropped was going to allow 1.8 million illegal aliens to cross the border every year. That is not border control but a migration plan.

Wait this bipartisan bill would have reduced the number of illegal crossings by A LOT and you’re saying Trump still stopped it simply because it wasn’t down to zero?? One couldn’t have improved the situation immediately just because that wouldn’t be good for Trump?!!!!?

Ps asking for asylum isn’t illegal. In case you were ignorant of that fact.

Crossing the border in between ports of entry is illegal. And the “asylum seekers” are purely economic migrants.

+1
Even Joe Biden, who insisted for 3 years that there was “no crisis at the border,” finally stopped lying and signed an EO that tightens up the standards for asylum. Funny that he didn’t take action upon taking office instead of waiting for an election year to roll around. The crisis he caused could have been fixed much earlier.

He DID take action after assuming office. That’s why things got so bad.

[Anonymous]

Wow, Australia has borders?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I'd love to think that one day, American politicians will have an easy time identifying and opposing Nazis, too.

Everyone knows Nazis are black.

Robinson for Governor!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, countries can limit who gets to cross their borders? Is that even legal?

I am LOLing at the irony of this post
- White supremacy of banning a black woman ✔️
- Enforcing borders like white supremacists ✔️
- Shutting down black voices like a white supremacist ✔️

And democrats and liberals are cheering. ✔️

Does make you feel better that Australia, also banned Milo Yiannopoulos, Tommy Robinson and Gavin McInnes? All white men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure, it’s cool when they ban people we don’t like/don’t agree with, but what happens when they ban folks from our team?

ICYMI: Trump and the right wing orgs that support him have already begun making lists. Do we really want to live in a country or a world where people are canceled, censored, locked up, etc. based on their opinions? I don’t.

Did you just time travel here from 1991?
Dems created that world here, circa 2009.

Sure, but Trump and his cronies will perfect it by rounding up people, locking them up, destroying their businesses, etc.

Have you seen the list of “targets” posted on a conservative site seemingly aimed at dismantling large swaths of the federal government? They list federal employees and label them as targets based on their campaign donations, social media posts, upholding the law, etc.

WTAF are you talking about? Provide credible citations.
NP

https://nypost.com/2024/10/23/us-news/american-accountability-foundation-unveils-list-of-radical-leftist-officials-it-wants-trump-to-fire-if-elected/

It was covered on the news last week and here’s what I could find via google.

From the American Accountability Foundation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good for Australia. Candace Owens is a scourge and lying machine.

But she looks sooo good that it's ok. I could watch her lie all day - preferably on her back.