If you're not in the DMV, how are you getting your intel that most DMV buyer's agents are taking 1-1.5% now? |
It's a second home. |
| If I sell, I would pay my seller's agent 1% and nothing to a buyer's agent. If the buyer wants to get an agent, they have to pay for it themselves. |
+1 |
Good luck with that |
It isn’t your problem. Their client will owe the other 1 percent. I mean, the client might withdraw the offer because of that. But it’s not your problem otherwise. |
| I’m paying them in hope for future business. |
Right? Because good luck with negotiating competitive pricing in the industry of price collusion, kickback-ery and fraud. Good luck indeed. |
The question is about about whether 1.5% is reasonable for a buyer to ask their agent to agree to when the agent is asking the buyer to sign an agreement that the buyer's agent will get 2.5%. |
The answer is to find a different realtor. 2.5% is ridiculously high these days. 1-2% is the norm for people even using buyer agents. How could you ever trust an agent that asked you to pay 2.5%? |
| Based on my experience, I don't think 2- 2.5% is outside the norm in DC to pay a seller's agent. And I am offering 2% to a buyer's agent. That's my choice, to help me market it. It's baked into my asking price. But, you do you. |
OP is asking about buyer's agents. 2.5% is outside of the norm (too high). |
DP, why? My house is worth 1.7M and would sell in a nano second. Is $17,000 a bad deal for 1.5 days work? |
| We just got an offer with no buyers agent and our selling agent reduced commission to 2.5% |
I wouldn't pay a sellers agent a dime over 2. |