Potomac memorial tournament

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a U13 ECNL team in the tournament

Bethesda's 2010 MLS Next team (U14) is in it. You know why? Because it's not as competitive as other local tournaments like Jeff Cup or Copa Rayados where top tier ECNL and MLS Next teams participate.

Bethesda can't cheat the age group rules in non-MLSN tournaments by playing big athletic players down a year. In this tournament they face a bottom table ECNL team, USYS teams, and an NAL team. They still might not win it. Let's see if they lose to Laurel. Again.

What makes you think Bethesda isn't going to use their 2009 bio-banded players in the tournament? Tournament never checks roster or player cards.

Ha! I just assumed they wouldn't be that bold.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a U13 ECNL team in the tournament

Bethesda's 2010 MLS Next team (U14) is in it. You know why? Because it's not as competitive as other local tournaments like Jeff Cup or Copa Rayados where top tier ECNL and MLS Next teams participate.

Bethesda can't cheat the age group rules in non-MLSN tournaments by playing big athletic players down a year. In this tournament they face a bottom table ECNL team, USYS teams, and an NAL team. They still might not win it. Let's see if they lose to Laurel. Again.

What makes you think Bethesda isn't going to use their 2009 bio-banded players in the tournament? Tournament never checks roster or player cards.

The goal is to win. They do whatever it takes. Tournaments is where guests and ringers show up to help win and score points for Gotsoccer rankings.

Ha! I just assumed they wouldn't be that bold.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a U13 ECNL team in the tournament

Bethesda's 2010 MLS Next team (U14) is in it. You know why? Because it's not as competitive as other local tournaments like Jeff Cup or Copa Rayados where top tier ECNL and MLS Next teams participate.

Bethesda can't cheat the age group rules in non-MLSN tournaments by playing big athletic players down a year. In this tournament they face a bottom table ECNL team, USYS teams, and an NAL team. They still might not win it. Let's see if they lose to Laurel. Again.

What makes you think Bethesda isn't going to use their 2009 bio-banded players in the tournament? Tournament never checks roster or player cards.

Ha! I just assumed they wouldn't be that bold.

Those players 2009 team is also in the tournament

[Anonymous]

A dumb question. Is this tournament only for boys?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A dumb question. Is this tournament only for boys?

Yes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a U13 ECNL team in the tournament

Bethesda's 2010 MLS Next team (U14) is in it. You know why? Because it's not as competitive as other local tournaments like Jeff Cup or Copa Rayados where top tier ECNL and MLS Next teams participate.

Bethesda can't cheat the age group rules in non-MLSN tournaments by playing big athletic players down a year. In this tournament they face a bottom table ECNL team, USYS teams, and an NAL team. They still might not win it. Let's see if they lose to Laurel. Again.

What makes you think Bethesda isn't going to use their 2009 bio-banded players in the tournament? Tournament never checks roster or player cards.

Since PPA U14's beat Bethesda MLS Next U14's 4:0 I suspect the 09's biobanders were with their 09's team

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a U13 ECNL team in the tournament

Bethesda's 2010 MLS Next team (U14) is in it. You know why? Because it's not as competitive as other local tournaments like Jeff Cup or Copa Rayados where top tier ECNL and MLS Next teams participate.

Bethesda can't cheat the age group rules in non-MLSN tournaments by playing big athletic players down a year. In this tournament they face a bottom table ECNL team, USYS teams, and an NAL team. They still might not win it. Let's see if they lose to Laurel. Again.

What makes you think Bethesda isn't going to use their 2009 bio-banded players in the tournament? Tournament never checks roster or player cards.

Since PPA U14's beat Bethesda MLS Next U14's 4:0 I suspect the 09's biobanders were with their 09's team

PPA on fire this season.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a U13 ECNL team in the tournament

Bethesda's 2010 MLS Next team (U14) is in it. You know why? Because it's not as competitive as other local tournaments like Jeff Cup or Copa Rayados where top tier ECNL and MLS Next teams participate.

Bethesda can't cheat the age group rules in non-MLSN tournaments by playing big athletic players down a year. In this tournament they face a bottom table ECNL team, USYS teams, and an NAL team. They still might not win it. Let's see if they lose to Laurel. Again.

What makes you think Bethesda isn't going to use their 2009 bio-banded players in the tournament? Tournament never checks roster or player cards.

Since PPA U14's beat Bethesda MLS Next U14's 4:0 I suspect the 09's biobanders were with their 09's team

PPA on fire this season.

PPA has 4 wins in 9 games and are 4th in their EDP division
I wouldn't say on fire

Bethesda U14's is just not their normal illusion without the bio-banding kids playing

[Anonymous]

Excuse me, honest question because I don't speak the cool soccer parent lingo but what is "bio banding"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a U13 ECNL team in the tournament

Bethesda's 2010 MLS Next team (U14) is in it. You know why? Because it's not as competitive as other local tournaments like Jeff Cup or Copa Rayados where top tier ECNL and MLS Next teams participate.

Bethesda can't cheat the age group rules in non-MLSN tournaments by playing big athletic players down a year. In this tournament they face a bottom table ECNL team, USYS teams, and an NAL team. They still might not win it. Let's see if they lose to Laurel. Again.

What makes you think Bethesda isn't going to use their 2009 bio-banded players in the tournament? Tournament never checks roster or player cards.

Since PPA U14's beat Bethesda MLS Next U14's 4:0 I suspect the 09's biobanders were with their 09's team

PPA on fire this season.

Their 2011's lost to 2012's in the final. Maybe a little firepit fire?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Excuse me, honest question because I don't speak the cool soccer parent lingo but what is "bio banding"?

It's when kids that are later to mature are allowed to play a year below what they actually are.
For example, a really short 2012 kid playing on the 2013 team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Muldoon’s….ugh

Agreed. The worst field conditions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Muldoon’s….ugh

Agreed. The worst field conditions.

Grass was way to long.