They already have his last name, now they get middle names from his side as well? Parents who say they don't care about that snub are lying |
I agree. Family member with three kids used maternal side of the family exclusively when coming up with names/middle names. That's where the money is. It's obvious to everyone on the paternal side they are pandering to money and embracing only that family heritage. Sad, really. |
I'm so confused. Your kids have first names too, don't they? |
What's their last name from? |
Who paid for all the beer in grad school? |
WTF are you talking about? |
|
My last name is DH's last name.
DH insisted that we name out children with my maiden name. Absolutely would not entertain a random name. He didn't want me regretting not passing on a name. My parents are wealthy-ish and his are not but that didn't really cross our minds. My parents don't plan to pay for college AFAIK. |
That is interesting. So you and your husband have one last name, and your kids have another? Or you mean your kids' middle names are your former last name (which isn't as exciting to me, although we have the same -- except I kept my last name)? |
|
If everyone knows your first was named after your FIL, and the next one is too, then yes, I'd expect hurt feelings.
I'd go with a neutral name, or named after one of your parents. My kids all have a grandparent middle name. One grandparent got left out, but it was only because we had three kids and stopped. We didn't leave one side of the family out. |
| I really doubt wealthy grandparents are leaving the kids more money who have their names. Name them whatever you want. This is why we didn’t name our kids after anyone. |
|
If you've told your parents you're thinking of using their name and then use the ILs, I wouldn't be at all surprised if they're hurt. They may not carry on about it, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't have been touched by a grandchild with the family name.
I wouldn't leave one side of the family out. |