Let Your Voice Be Heard re: Action of DC Council

[Anonymous]

What’s really so wrong with murdering someone?

I mean, everyone makes mistakes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We know that you can't imagine being in that situation; that's the value in having a different perspective on the committee.

I find this point of view bewildering. "If someone commits a horrific crime that the rest of us can't imagine committing, then they have a value alternative perspective on life and we should have them in our government." What next, should we get some January 6'ers to be part of our government since most people in D.C. can't imagine assaulting The Capitol for Trump?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that you can't imagine being in that situation; that's the value in having a different perspective on the committee.

I find this point of view bewildering. "If someone commits a horrific crime that the rest of us can't imagine committing, then they have a value alternative perspective on life and we should have them in our government." What next, should we get some January 6'ers to be part of our government since most people in D.C. can't imagine assaulting The Capitol for Trump?

We're not asking this person to legislate. They are providing a different POV on sentencing because they have the perspective of someone who grew up in a different community than most people on this site, and then went through an experience that I doubt 1% of users could understand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that you can't imagine being in that situation; that's the value in having a different perspective on the committee.

I find this point of view bewildering. "If someone commits a horrific crime that the rest of us can't imagine committing, then they have a value alternative perspective on life and we should have them in our government." What next, should we get some January 6'ers to be part of our government since most people in D.C. can't imagine assaulting The Capitol for Trump?

We're not asking this person to legislate. They are providing a different POV on sentencing because they have the perspective of someone who grew up in a different community than most people on this site, and then went through an experience that I doubt 1% of users could understand.

…… because they MURDERED SOMEONE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that you can't imagine being in that situation; that's the value in having a different perspective on the committee.

I find this point of view bewildering. "If someone commits a horrific crime that the rest of us can't imagine committing, then they have a value alternative perspective on life and we should have them in our government." What next, should we get some January 6'ers to be part of our government since most people in D.C. can't imagine assaulting The Capitol for Trump?

We need more cannibals on the council, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that you can't imagine being in that situation; that's the value in having a different perspective on the committee.

I find this point of view bewildering. "If someone commits a horrific crime that the rest of us can't imagine committing, then they have a value alternative perspective on life and we should have them in our government." What next, should we get some January 6'ers to be part of our government since most people in D.C. can't imagine assaulting The Capitol for Trump?

We're not asking this person to legislate. They are providing a different POV on sentencing because they have the perspective of someone who grew up in a different community than most people on this site, and then went through an experience that I doubt 1% of users could understand.

…… because they MURDERED SOMEONE.

And they served their time, and are being given the opportunity to make a positive contribution to our community.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that you can't imagine being in that situation; that's the value in having a different perspective on the committee.

I find this point of view bewildering. "If someone commits a horrific crime that the rest of us can't imagine committing, then they have a value alternative perspective on life and we should have them in our government." What next, should we get some January 6'ers to be part of our government since most people in D.C. can't imagine assaulting The Capitol for Trump?

We're not asking this person to legislate. They are providing a different POV on sentencing because they have the perspective of someone who grew up in a different community than most people on this site, and then went through an experience that I doubt 1% of users could understand.

We also need more rapists, child molesters and can we at least find ONE serial killer too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that you can't imagine being in that situation; that's the value in having a different perspective on the committee.

I find this point of view bewildering. "If someone commits a horrific crime that the rest of us can't imagine committing, then they have a value alternative perspective on life and we should have them in our government." What next, should we get some January 6'ers to be part of our government since most people in D.C. can't imagine assaulting The Capitol for Trump?

We're not asking this person to legislate. They are providing a different POV on sentencing because they have the perspective of someone who grew up in a different community than most people on this site, and then went through an experience that I doubt 1% of users could understand.

We also need more rapists, child molesters and can we at least find ONE serial killer too?

yes this is exactly what it looks like when two people have a normal conversation.

[Anonymous]

Narrator: This debate, in a city that doesnt prosecute anyone for anything. The average murder suspect in Washington D.C. has previously been arrested 11 times. Google people on trial in Superior Court. Their rap sheet is astounding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that you can't imagine being in that situation; that's the value in having a different perspective on the committee.

I find this point of view bewildering. "If someone commits a horrific crime that the rest of us can't imagine committing, then they have a value alternative perspective on life and we should have them in our government." What next, should we get some January 6'ers to be part of our government since most people in D.C. can't imagine assaulting The Capitol for Trump?

We're not asking this person to legislate. They are providing a different POV on sentencing because they have the perspective of someone who grew up in a different community than most people on this site, and then went through an experience that I doubt 1% of users could understand.

But no white murderers, right? Or Hispanic? Or Asian? No one middle class, too, right? Or rich? No women, I'm guessing. It sounds like you have a very specific POV in mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that you can't imagine being in that situation; that's the value in having a different perspective on the committee.

I find this point of view bewildering. "If someone commits a horrific crime that the rest of us can't imagine committing, then they have a value alternative perspective on life and we should have them in our government." What next, should we get some January 6'ers to be part of our government since most people in D.C. can't imagine assaulting The Capitol for Trump?

We're not asking this person to legislate. They are providing a different POV on sentencing because they have the perspective of someone who grew up in a different community than most people on this site, and then went through an experience that I doubt 1% of users could understand.

But no white murderers, right? Or Hispanic? Or Asian? No one middle class, too, right? Or rich? No women, I'm guessing. It sounds like you have a very specific POV in mind.

We're discussing a specific person here, so yes in this case the POV is specific.

[Anonymous]

This is another reason why we need to clean house on the city council. Start in this year's primary by dumping Janeese.

Expecting these extreme lefties to do something constructive about crime is like voting for Republicans and expecting them to help the poor. It's not ever going to happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Narrator: This debate, in a city that doesnt prosecute anyone for anything. The average murder suspect in Washington D.C. has previously been arrested 11 times. Google people on trial in Superior Court. Their rap sheet is astounding.

Few cities in this country are softer on crime than DC. And what has it gotten us?

"The nation’s capital recorded more homicides in 2023 than in any year since 1997, giving the District the fifth-highest murder rate among the nation’s biggest cities....

With a rate of 40 homicides per 100,000 residents, the District was deadlier than 55 of the country’s 60 most populous cities, behind only New Orleans, Cleveland, Baltimore and Memphis. While homicides surged in Washington, they decreased in many other metropolises, including New York and Chicago."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/interactive/2024/dc-crime-homicide-victims-shooting-violence/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that you can't imagine being in that situation; that's the value in having a different perspective on the committee.

I find this point of view bewildering. "If someone commits a horrific crime that the rest of us can't imagine committing, then they have a value alternative perspective on life and we should have them in our government." What next, should we get some January 6'ers to be part of our government since most people in D.C. can't imagine assaulting The Capitol for Trump?

We're not asking this person to legislate. They are providing a different POV on sentencing because they have the perspective of someone who grew up in a different community than most people on this site, and then went through an experience that I doubt 1% of users could understand.

We also need more rapists, child molesters and can we at least find ONE serial killer too?

This passive voice as though it was something that happened to him, not he took a HUMAN LIFE, it's sick ideology.

went through an experience that I doubt 1% of users could understand

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Narrator: This debate, in a city that doesnt prosecute anyone for anything. The average murder suspect in Washington D.C. has previously been arrested 11 times. Google people on trial in Superior Court. Their rap sheet is astounding.

Few cities in this country are softer on crime than DC. And what has it gotten us?

"The nation’s capital recorded more homicides in 2023 than in any year since 1997, giving the District the fifth-highest murder rate among the nation’s biggest cities....

With a rate of 40 homicides per 100,000 residents, the District was deadlier than 55 of the country’s 60 most populous cities, behind only New Orleans, Cleveland, Baltimore and Memphis. While homicides surged in Washington, they decreased in many other metropolises, including New York and Chicago."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/interactive/2024/dc-crime-homicide-victims-shooting-violence/

It has gotten us a staggering number of shot and dead black kids and a lot of dead black men. Those agitating for more of the same policies would suggest that that must be the goal?

When you ignore the rhetoric and look at results it's a eugenicist's dream come true. The politicians and the "activists" are the real racists, they have blood on their hands.