I’m the PP who shared that anecdote. I no longer work at that school because admin was most of the problem. We were not allowed to confiscate phones, nor were we allowed to call the office for a phone violation. We were reminded at every faculty meeting: if we make our lessons engaging enough, kids won’t use their phones. It was considered our fault if phones were out in classrooms. |
A lot of administrators HATE that they are told to say such garbage to teachers. A lot of them, their hands are tied, too. |
| My administration is too busy dealing with fights, vaping, and other behaviors to have time or energy to deal with phone usage. We aren’t allowed to touch students’ phones and they know it. |
| Admin giving teachers a hard time and pushing them out of the profession because students are out of control and responsible teacherd are targeted for blame and to justify the declines. Principals are never blamed for the declines in their schools but the toxic environments they create have direct influences on morale and retention. I tell prospective teachers to stay away from education because no human should have to deal with the abuse that teachers have to endure professionally. |
It’s not just one generation that will be affected. These kids are going to be parents and their kids will be parents. When will kids be raised properly again? And how? They won’t even know what that means. |
|
“ Principals are never blamed for the declines in their schools”
This is not true. Smart people know the problems come from all directions. |
It sounded like admin wasn’t doing anything to enforce consequences. Confiscating the phone would be better than nothing. The PP said they blamed the teacher for being in the way when pushed. |
NP and at my school here is how some parents would respond: admin takes phone. Kid tells parent. Parent calls admin and says you can’t take my child’s property I’m going to call you boss and sue the school. It is NEVER the kid’s fault in the eyes of many parents. |
You really don’t see how your child wasn’t wrong or didn’t need consequences is the same argument everyone is making here? That’s why teachers are leaving. |
| I find it hard to separate those three categories. Ultimately, it is the student behavior that I had to put up with every day that made me need to leave, but those student behaviors only exist because of poor admin and poor parenting. |
I understand. What would be your administration’s response to the parents? At my MS: First offense, phone gets confiscated and student can pick it up at the end of the day. Second, the phone gets confiscated and a parent has to pick it up. Third offense results in confiscation and a meeting between admin, counselor, parent(s) and student before the phone is returned. If the parent calls, complains and your administration caves (which I totally understand happens) then that’s on them. |
| NP. It's the 5% of students who take up 90% of resources and energy. It's not fair to the other kids, the staff, or the students in question. Admin refusing to back teachers who report concerns with these students is a close second, especially when there are legitimate safety issues. |
Because you think the parents can do what to make they kid sit still or listen or not back talk the next day in class? You don’t fix these things with consequences. You fix them with services, and there aren’t enough services for all the kids who need them. |
NP but I see that teachers are SAYING the kids are so awful because the parents need to give more consequences. Sometimes (maybe often?) the teachers are wrong. |
Admin at my school have no backbone but would also be undermined by their boss because they are afraid of loud parents. So kid still gets the phone and walks around like they own the place because mommy and daddy let them do whatever they want. Oh and some get a diagnosis that they need the phone for anxiety or addiction or stress. It’s total BS. |