You don't think it's news that the reporter who debunked pizzagate

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's newsworthy that someone was convicted of child sexual abuse, completely independently of any pizzagate connections.

What was the article about the conviction?

According to the post following yours, the article was completely fake.

The reporter was not arrested for child abuse?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-abc-pizzagate/fact-check-fabricated-new-york-post-headline-on-ex-abc-journalist-idUSL1N39W381

VA area reporter real. CSAM conviction real. Pizzagate connection fake.

Kind of a hedge here:

Meek did not publish an investigation about or “debunk Pizzagate” while at ABC (here), (ghostarchive.org/archive/PvDFu).

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's newsworthy that someone was convicted of child sexual abuse, completely independently of any pizzagate connections.

What was the article about the conviction?

According to the post following yours, the article was completely fake.

The reporter was not arrested for child abuse?

That was not your allegation. You claimed that he "debunked PizzaGate". Turns out that is false.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Jeff. It appears the OP is completely insane. I think we see daily examples of their distorted thinking, weird concern trolling and obsessions with fake gotcha stories that have been amplified (and usually embellished) by propaganda outfits.

The reporter was molesting kids and convicted. That not distorted or fake but I would say it is weird and concerning.

Hundreds of journalists reported about the Pizzagate hoax. Why is the fact that one turned out to be a child molester important? Do you believe this means that Pizzagate was not a hoax?

Kind of falls under the "me thinks this guy protests too much".

He, like many others, did accurate reporting. Again, what is your point here? Do you think that Democrats really were holding children as sex slaves in the basement of Comet Pizza? Do you believe that nut cases like your buddy Cernovich weren't spreading conspiracy theories about Comet Pizza? Really, what is your point?

My point is pretty clear. That a reporter who blamed a mentally ill Marine for attempting a rescue of what he thought were kids in danger at Comet Pizza , was in fact, performing heinous acts on children.

The only thing Cernovich seemed to get wrong was the place.

Sad to see that you've gone full QAnon, but I guess that was always inevitable. Edgar Welch never served in the military, let alone the Marines. He has not been diagnosed as mentally ill. Of course, he should be blamed for his armed attack on Comet Pizza, do you suggest otherwise?

James Gordon Meek, the reporter in question, was hired by Republican Peter King as a staff member on the House Committee on Homeland Security before he went to work for ABC News. Why aren't you investigating why Republicans hired a child sexual abuser? Moreover, Meek's most famous story was not PizzaGate — he did not have a prominent role in covering that story — but rather a purely invented allegation that Arabs intended to bomb the Hudson River tunnels. That's probably what brought him to the attention of the virulently anti-Arab King.

As for Cernovich, he promoted the allegation that the Clintons were running a pedophile ring in the basement of Comet Pizza (which doesn't have a basement as Welch found out). You think he only got the place wrong? So, you agree with him that the Clintons were running a pedophile ring? If so, your mind is well and truly gone.

I believe the Clintons are capable of a lot of evil (see Haiti as one example) but Comet Pizza? Nope. Do I believe that the government doesn’t want to see child sex crimes? Yes - the FBI took a lot of agents away from the child sex crimes unit(s) to work on Jan 6th. Do I believe that the Biden administration is allowing kids to be abused at the border? Yes. I’d rather have kids separated from parents at the border to be sure those kids are not being simply trafficked.

I’d be careful when you speak of Arabs being accused of bombings. It’s not like there isn’t a track record?

So, in addition to being a QAnon conspiracy theorist you are also an Islamaphobe. Good to know.

It doesn’t take an Islamophobe to look at 9/11 and the attempted bombing in the garage and know that Arabs did it. Do you think otherwise?

That doesn't mean that false allegations should be believed. Of course, you seem to enjoy false allegations. White right-wingers did the Oklahoma City bombing. Should we immediately believe any made-up allegation about white right-wingers since they have a track record?

So far you have pedaled a false story about a reporter, claimed "The only thing Cernovich seemed to get wrong was the place", and said that false allegations against Arabs should be accepted as fact. That's quite a record you are compiling.

Haven’t there been many posts here on the forum deleted or blocked that turned out to be true after all?

No there haven't. There have been a lot of posts that you claimed to be true, but weren't. This thread illustrates your latest example.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's newsworthy that someone was convicted of child sexual abuse, completely independently of any pizzagate connections.

What was the article about the conviction?

According to the post following yours, the article was completely fake.

If my name is on an article that states that, say, there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement has been found to be false, would it be fair to call me an election denier?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's newsworthy that someone was convicted of child sexual abuse, completely independently of any pizzagate connections.

What was the article about the conviction?

According to the post following yours, the article was completely fake.

If my name is on an article that states that, say, there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement has been found to be false, would it be fair to call me an election denier?

You can't be this stupid (I mean, you can, but I am assuming that you aren't). If you wrote an article saying that there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement is later found to be false, it would be fair to call you an election denier. If, on the other hand, massive election fraud was discovered, your article would be accurate, even if you yourself were later convicted of voter fraud.

In this case, Gordon Meek never debunked PizzaGate. In an article about Russian propaganda, he mentioned, "the debunked 'Pizzagate' conspiracy theory". That is a completely accurate description.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's newsworthy that someone was convicted of child sexual abuse, completely independently of any pizzagate connections.

What was the article about the conviction?

According to the post following yours, the article was completely fake.

If my name is on an article that states that, say, there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement has been found to be false, would it be fair to call me an election denier?

You can't be this stupid (I mean, you can, but I am assuming that you aren't). If you wrote an article saying that there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement is later found to be false, it would be fair to call you an election denier. If, on the other hand, massive election fraud was discovered, your article would be accurate, even if you yourself were later convicted of voter fraud.

In this case, Gordon Meek never debunked PizzaGate. In an article about Russian propaganda, he mentioned, "the debunked 'Pizzagate' conspiracy theory". That is a completely accurate description.

Gordon Meek put his name on the article. So it’s accurate to say he was part and parcel in debunking Pizzagate. I’m not saying that Pizzagate is true. I’m simply stating that Meek was supporting the abuse of children while at the same time, calling out Cernovich for believing a story about child abuse. Pretty ironic.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's newsworthy that someone was convicted of child sexual abuse, completely independently of any pizzagate connections.

What was the article about the conviction?

According to the post following yours, the article was completely fake.

If my name is on an article that states that, say, there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement has been found to be false, would it be fair to call me an election denier?

You can't be this stupid (I mean, you can, but I am assuming that you aren't). If you wrote an article saying that there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement is later found to be false, it would be fair to call you an election denier. If, on the other hand, massive election fraud was discovered, your article would be accurate, even if you yourself were later convicted of voter fraud.

In this case, Gordon Meek never debunked PizzaGate. In an article about Russian propaganda, he mentioned, "the debunked 'Pizzagate' conspiracy theory". That is a completely accurate description.

Gordon Meek put his name on the article. So it’s accurate to say he was part and parcel in debunking Pizzagate. I’m not saying that Pizzagate is true. I’m simply stating that Meek was supporting the abuse of children while at the same time, calling out Cernovich for believing a story about child abuse. Pretty ironic.

Okay, I gave you the benefit of the doubt but you really are that stupid. Meek did not debunk PizzaGate. He mentioned that others had debunked the conspiracy theory. That was an accurate statement and one with which you apparently agree. Similarly, he described the many conspiracies that Cernovich propagated. He was also accurate about that. I am not sure why you are criticizing Meek for his accurate writing while defending his inaccurate allegations about Arabs.

[Anonymous]

Everyone stop wasting your time here fighting with Dictator Jeff, and go share Real News freely on Truth Social, where there are no reality-based communities to censor you.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Everyone stop wasting your time here fighting with Dictator Jeff, and go share Real News freely on Truth Social, where there are no reality-based communities to censor you.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's newsworthy that someone was convicted of child sexual abuse, completely independently of any pizzagate connections.

What was the article about the conviction?

According to the post following yours, the article was completely fake.

If my name is on an article that states that, say, there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement has been found to be false, would it be fair to call me an election denier?

You can't be this stupid (I mean, you can, but I am assuming that you aren't). If you wrote an article saying that there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement is later found to be false, it would be fair to call you an election denier. If, on the other hand, massive election fraud was discovered, your article would be accurate, even if you yourself were later convicted of voter fraud.

In this case, Gordon Meek never debunked PizzaGate. In an article about Russian propaganda, he mentioned, "the debunked 'Pizzagate' conspiracy theory". That is a completely accurate description.

Gordon Meek put his name on the article. So it’s accurate to say he was part and parcel in debunking Pizzagate. I’m not saying that Pizzagate is true. I’m simply stating that Meek was supporting the abuse of children while at the same time, calling out Cernovich for believing a story about child abuse. Pretty ironic.

DP. Holy crap is this really how these people think?!

[Anonymous]

It's astonishing how many delusional people walk among us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's astonishing how many delusional people walk among us.

Half the people walking the earth have a two-digit IQ. It’s less astonishing if you keep that in mind.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's newsworthy that someone was convicted of child sexual abuse, completely independently of any pizzagate connections.

What was the article about the conviction?

According to the post following yours, the article was completely fake.

If my name is on an article that states that, say, there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement has been found to be false, would it be fair to call me an election denier?

You can't be this stupid (I mean, you can, but I am assuming that you aren't). If you wrote an article saying that there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement is later found to be false, it would be fair to call you an election denier. If, on the other hand, massive election fraud was discovered, your article would be accurate, even if you yourself were later convicted of voter fraud.

In this case, Gordon Meek never debunked PizzaGate. In an article about Russian propaganda, he mentioned, "the debunked 'Pizzagate' conspiracy theory". That is a completely accurate description.

Gordon Meek put his name on the article. So it’s accurate to say he was part and parcel in debunking Pizzagate. I’m not saying that Pizzagate is true. I’m simply stating that Meek was supporting the abuse of children while at the same time, calling out Cernovich for believing a story about child abuse. Pretty ironic.

Okay, I gave you the benefit of the doubt but you really are that stupid. Meek did not debunk PizzaGate. He mentioned that others had debunked the conspiracy theory. That was an accurate statement and one with which you apparently agree. Similarly, he described the many conspiracies that Cernovich propagated. He was also accurate about that. I am not sure why you are criticizing Meek for his accurate writing while defending his inaccurate allegations about Arabs.

when you resort to insults, you lost the argument

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's newsworthy that someone was convicted of child sexual abuse, completely independently of any pizzagate connections.

What was the article about the conviction?

According to the post following yours, the article was completely fake.

If my name is on an article that states that, say, there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement has been found to be false, would it be fair to call me an election denier?

You can't be this stupid (I mean, you can, but I am assuming that you aren't). If you wrote an article saying that there was massive voter fraud in PA and that statement is later found to be false, it would be fair to call you an election denier. If, on the other hand, massive election fraud was discovered, your article would be accurate, even if you yourself were later convicted of voter fraud.

In this case, Gordon Meek never debunked PizzaGate. In an article about Russian propaganda, he mentioned, "the debunked 'Pizzagate' conspiracy theory". That is a completely accurate description.

Gordon Meek put his name on the article. So it’s accurate to say he was part and parcel in debunking Pizzagate. I’m not saying that Pizzagate is true. I’m simply stating that Meek was supporting the abuse of children while at the same time, calling out Cernovich for believing a story about child abuse. Pretty ironic.

Okay, I gave you the benefit of the doubt but you really are that stupid. Meek did not debunk PizzaGate. He mentioned that others had debunked the conspiracy theory. That was an accurate statement and one with which you apparently agree. Similarly, he described the many conspiracies that Cernovich propagated. He was also accurate about that. I am not sure why you are criticizing Meek for his accurate writing while defending his inaccurate allegations about Arabs.

I don’t’ know why you are defending a man who abused kids?