Is it hypocritical to be staunchly and loudly pro-life and use IVF?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They do not a give a f#ck if they are hypocrites. They are power hungry savages & busy bodies who like forcing themselves into others’ lives. And, of course, the rules don’t apply to them.

Who is "they"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, is your question about someone in particular, because I personally don't know anyone who is pro life and pro embryo destruction?

OP here. Yes. Politically conservative, active in the extremely conservative NA Anglican Church, March 4 Life, voted for Trump “for the Supreme Court” and all kids conceived via IVF. And not the “natural cycle” one.

Yes, that seems to reflect an illogical contradiction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It depends on what you mean by prolife. I agree with the guidelines in RvW that abortion shouldn't occur after viability except in edge cases. That's a prolife position these days, but a few short years ago it was pro choice.

Really? I did not notice this shift. Can you say more about that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If any embryo is destroyed, then yes.

This. The pro-lifers who really piss me off are the ones who get abortions then go right back to their pro-life position. I would put destroying an embryo in this hypocritical category too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It depends on what you mean by prolife. I agree with the guidelines in RvW that abortion shouldn't occur after viability except in edge cases. That's a prolife position these days, but a few short years ago it was pro choice.

Really? I did not notice this shift. Can you say more about that?

Dp- there’s no shift. We had a compromise that pro choice advocates were willing to live with. Forced birthers blew that up, and now women aren’t interested in a compromise. We want our inalienable rights. More of us are educated now on who needs abortions and why. More of us have had dangerous and scary pregnancies and births. We don’t want a doctor to be compromised in giving us the best care. Abortion is healthcare, and no one wants compromised care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It depends on what you mean by prolife. I agree with the guidelines in RvW that abortion shouldn't occur after viability except in edge cases. That's a prolife position these days, but a few short years ago it was pro choice.

Really? I did not notice this shift. Can you say more about that?

Dp- there’s no shift. We had a compromise that pro choice advocates were willing to live with. Forced birthers blew that up, and now women aren’t interested in a compromise. We want our inalienable rights. More of us are educated now on who needs abortions and why. More of us have had dangerous and scary pregnancies and births. We don’t want a doctor to be compromised in giving us the best care. Abortion is healthcare, and no one wants compromised care.

+1. We want to keep ignorance away from our children and protect their access to whatever reporductive healthcare they decide they need with their doctor. Everyone else needs to stay out of it.

[Anonymous]

Not every clinic is an embryo factory. I recently learned Dr. Gordon formerly of Dominion Fertility moved to TN several yrs ago and is medical director of what appears to be a pro life IVF clinic? Natural cycle IVF, mini stim IVF and embryo donation/adoption are highlighted on the website.

https://southeasternfertility.org/about-us/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not every clinic is an embryo factory. I recently learned Dr. Gordon formerly of Dominion Fertility moved to TN several yrs ago and is medical director of what appears to be a pro life IVF clinic? Natural cycle IVF, mini stim IVF and embryo donation/adoption are highlighted on the website.

https://southeasternfertility.org/about-us/

That is against God's will. No IVF.