Anonymous wrote:The pay to play model will not ever be good for development. There would have to be money and structure coming from above to establish a path - local club Rec, local club travel, regional club travel, national club (pro team affiliated?) travel - with incentives for the coaches to identify and push talent to the appropriate level.
Right now in the US you are not incentivized to develop players but to win, for which you build teams, retain your best, recruit, and play to win rather than develop in many cases - because your money comes from the families and the families come based on results and reputation. You fight against your neighbors rather than collaborate.
It’s hard in the US because we don’t have the density/number of professional clubs and the ones that are there are not as rich - so they can’t do what is going on in Spain and England where you have a pro environment and professional club money. Money would have to come from US soccer and they have shown they are not willing, they are fine with pay to play and college bearing the costs. We also don’t really have a model of development in other major American sports - they use drafts that pick kids built by others - none of them put money into developing players, they leave it to the pay to play and college models.
A model of 'club owns your contract and can sell you to other teams' I doubt would be viable in America.
|
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}