White supremacist leader of Unite the Right took molly and renounced beliefs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you give people DMT they start to believe in machine elves.

https://bigthink.com/the-present/dmt-beings/

Most people said the beings weren’t hallucinations. About three-quarters of respondents said they believe the being was real, but it exists in some kind of different dimension or reality.

A few people called them elves. Most said "being". Some said "angel". But way to deflect.

80% of Americans believe in angels.

I'm deflecting? I am not the one suggesting that we forcibly medicate the population with hallucinogens.

Yeah you did try to make it sound ridiculous by not accurately citing the data. That's a deflection.

BTW who said "forcibly"? I did not see the OP say that.

Posters are suggesting that conservatism is an adverse medical condition.

It doesn't matter how matter what people call fhe being seen while hallucinating. After DMT, people believe these being physically exist and are not drug-induced hallucinations. The base rate of belief is angels is irrelevant and, regardless, it's the change from baseline that matters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you give people DMT they start to believe in machine elves.

https://bigthink.com/the-present/dmt-beings/

Most people said the beings weren’t hallucinations. About three-quarters of respondents said they believe the being was real, but it exists in some kind of different dimension or reality.

A few people called them elves. Most said "being". Some said "angel". But way to deflect.

80% of Americans believe in angels.

I'm deflecting? I am not the one suggesting that we forcibly medicate the population with hallucinogens.

Yeah you did try to make it sound ridiculous by not accurately citing the data. That's a deflection.

BTW who said "forcibly"? I did not see the OP say that.

Posters are suggesting that conservatism is an adverse medical condition.

It doesn't matter how matter what people call fhe being seen while hallucinating. After DMT, people believe these being physically exist and are not drug-induced hallucinations. The base rate of belief is angels is irrelevant and, regardless, it's the change from baseline that matters.

Yet it remains true that you have hallucinated the idea that people want to forcibly treat cons with drugs.

And it remains that the OP is about white supremacy; you have drawn the line from white supremacy to conservatism. You hopped right into Hillary Clinton’s basket of deplorables with absolutely zero self awareness.

Since you brought it up: yes, I would agree with you that conservatism is an adverse condition. You have obviously been in the vortex and couldn’t see what you were all doing to yourselves over the last forty years. Those of us on the outside got to watch you spin yourselves into angry little rage tornadoes. It’s been horrifying to watch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you give people DMT they start to believe in machine elves.

https://bigthink.com/the-present/dmt-beings/

Most people said the beings weren’t hallucinations. About three-quarters of respondents said they believe the being was real, but it exists in some kind of different dimension or reality.

A few people called them elves. Most said "being". Some said "angel". But way to deflect.

80% of Americans believe in angels.

I'm deflecting? I am not the one suggesting that we forcibly medicate the population with hallucinogens.

Yeah you did try to make it sound ridiculous by not accurately citing the data. That's a deflection.

BTW who said "forcibly"? I did not see the OP say that.

Posters are suggesting that conservatism is an adverse medical condition.

It doesn't matter how matter what people call fhe being seen while hallucinating. After DMT, people believe these being physically exist and are not drug-induced hallucinations. The base rate of belief is angels is irrelevant and, regardless, it's the change from baseline that matters.

1. It was Extreme MAGA, and the case example is a white supremacist. That's an adverse something.
2. You are invalidating a drug currently used to treat PTSD for our soldiers, because you feel offended by the outcome in one case.

[Anonymous]

Iteresting that conservatives think the wrong kid of love is a psychological disorder. But they get offended when a type of hate is treated with medicine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you give people DMT they start to believe in machine elves.

https://bigthink.com/the-present/dmt-beings/

Most people said the beings weren’t hallucinations. About three-quarters of respondents said they believe the being was real, but it exists in some kind of different dimension or reality.

A few people called them elves. Most said "being". Some said "angel". But way to deflect.

80% of Americans believe in angels.

I'm deflecting? I am not the one suggesting that we forcibly medicate the population with hallucinogens.

Yeah you did try to make it sound ridiculous by not accurately citing the data. That's a deflection.

BTW who said "forcibly"? I did not see the OP say that.

Posters are suggesting that conservatism is an adverse medical condition.

It doesn't matter how matter what people call fhe being seen while hallucinating. After DMT, people believe these being physically exist and are not drug-induced hallucinations. The base rate of belief is angels is irrelevant and, regardless, it's the change from baseline that matters.

Yet it remains true that you have hallucinated the idea that people want to forcibly treat cons with drugs.

And it remains that the OP is about white supremacy; you have drawn the line from white supremacy to conservatism. You hopped right into Hillary Clinton’s basket of deplorables with absolutely zero self awareness.

Since you brought it up: yes, I would agree with you that conservatism is an adverse condition. You have obviously been in the vortex and couldn’t see what you were all doing to yourselves over the last forty years. Those of us on the outside got to watch you spin yourselves into angry little rage tornadoes. It’s been horrifying to watch.

Read the third post again. That drew the line to conservatism. Conservative values are not something that needs to be cured. Sounds like Hillary forgot to take her molly that day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you give people DMT they start to believe in machine elves.

https://bigthink.com/the-present/dmt-beings/

Most people said the beings weren’t hallucinations. About three-quarters of respondents said they believe the being was real, but it exists in some kind of different dimension or reality.

A few people called them elves. Most said "being". Some said "angel". But way to deflect.

80% of Americans believe in angels.

I'm deflecting? I am not the one suggesting that we forcibly medicate the population with hallucinogens.

Yeah you did try to make it sound ridiculous by not accurately citing the data. That's a deflection.

BTW who said "forcibly"? I did not see the OP say that.

Posters are suggesting that conservatism is an adverse medical condition.

It doesn't matter how matter what people call fhe being seen while hallucinating. After DMT, people believe these being physically exist and are not drug-induced hallucinations. The base rate of belief is angels is irrelevant and, regardless, it's the change from baseline that matters.

Yet it remains true that you have hallucinated the idea that people want to forcibly treat cons with drugs.

And it remains that the OP is about white supremacy; you have drawn the line from white supremacy to conservatism. You hopped right into Hillary Clinton’s basket of deplorables with absolutely zero self awareness.

Since you brought it up: yes, I would agree with you that conservatism is an adverse condition. You have obviously been in the vortex and couldn’t see what you were all doing to yourselves over the last forty years. Those of us on the outside got to watch you spin yourselves into angry little rage tornadoes. It’s been horrifying to watch.

Read the third post again. That drew the line to conservatism. Conservative values are not something that needs to be cured. Sounds like Hillary forgot to take her molly that day.

Greed, Anger, and Delusion are not Values, but they are the pillars of modern conservatism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you give people DMT they start to believe in machine elves.

https://bigthink.com/the-present/dmt-beings/

Most people said the beings weren’t hallucinations. About three-quarters of respondents said they believe the being was real, but it exists in some kind of different dimension or reality.

A few people called them elves. Most said "being". Some said "angel". But way to deflect.

80% of Americans believe in angels.

I'm deflecting? I am not the one suggesting that we forcibly medicate the population with hallucinogens.

Yeah you did try to make it sound ridiculous by not accurately citing the data. That's a deflection.

BTW who said "forcibly"? I did not see the OP say that.

Posters are suggesting that conservatism is an adverse medical condition.

It doesn't matter how matter what people call fhe being seen while hallucinating. After DMT, people believe these being physically exist and are not drug-induced hallucinations. The base rate of belief is angels is irrelevant and, regardless, it's the change from baseline that matters.

Yet it remains true that you have hallucinated the idea that people want to forcibly treat cons with drugs.

And it remains that the OP is about white supremacy; you have drawn the line from white supremacy to conservatism. You hopped right into Hillary Clinton’s basket of deplorables with absolutely zero self awareness.

Since you brought it up: yes, I would agree with you that conservatism is an adverse condition. You have obviously been in the vortex and couldn’t see what you were all doing to yourselves over the last forty years. Those of us on the outside got to watch you spin yourselves into angry little rage tornadoes. It’s been horrifying to watch.

Read the third post again. That drew the line to conservatism. Conservative values are not something that needs to be cured. Sounds like Hillary forgot to take her molly that day.

That comment was made on Reddit. Why don't you argue it over there with the person who said it?