Misunderstanding about earlier admissions post

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm just glad she wasn't on the jury for my son, who is now at St. Albans. He wouldn't have stood a chance: World Bank parents AND he loves sports. Poor thing probably won't amount to anything...

Same here!

You guys are a bunch of LOSERS I guess you didn't get in to your first choices.

OP was informative and shared her OBSERVATIONS.

Aren't you being a little childish?

There's a lot of venom being spewed at the OP who is sharing her benign views from having been a former teacher and having worked on the admissions committee of a private school. In this thread and a separate one, posters are attacking her for sharing her experience, calling her "horrible" and just a "Teacher". One of the posters who called her "a TEACHER" was so proud to have gone from a the "playgroup of our choice" to a "#1 choice preschool". Puh-lease. Why all the personal hostility to the OP? Given a large pool of children/people with similar characteristics, the admissions committee will consider other unique factors, just like they do for highly ranked colleges in undergrad & grad programs. By giving the example of World Bank/IMF and and parents working in law, she gave an example of what was common and not so unique.