|
OP here. Thank you for sharing thoughts. Will ignore rude responses.
The trees are 100 feet tall, here for a century I’m guessing and sit on our property. They are on the edge to neighbor’s property. No intention to take them down as they are healthy and beautiful. This is not a pruning issue. They are maintained. No low hanging limbs and debris is never major limbs. The debris is simple twigs and branches that come down all year which happens to both our yards trees and all over the neighborhood. Advice was needed on the intrepation of debris is “act of god” therefore you. Collect and remove what falls in your propert line. Tossing back to our yard, by MC law, is not legal. I do not do this to neighbor on other side. Not worth raising argument with neighbor as she is not worth it. Just trying to understand county rule. |
Yep. We have one of those neighbors. Yet it doesn't go both ways. He doesn't take care of his stuff that impacts us. Annoying but nothing to do about it except feel like the bigger person for not starting a justified war. |
I have a sycamore and a river birch, I am positive the river birch is worst. It drops branches all year, but drops pods, leaves, sap during various seasons. Beautiful but mess trees. Sycamores are bad too, but babies are cleaner than river birches |
+1 this is a totally bizarre neighbor You are right on the law but probably not worth making that relationship worse |
| There’s no obligation for a tree owner to engage in costly tree “maintenance”. Trees are naturally occurring and, short of removing a clearly diseased tree posing an obvious danger to life or property, the owner has no actual obligation. Certainly none to reduce the number of twigs falling on the other side of the fence. Get real. |
| Yes, trees are naturally occurring. But there is nothing natural about a 100 year old giant oak or maple in a yard with nothing around it as a windbreak. They grow naturally like that in forests. They grow and self prune based on light availability from competing surrounding trees, and are not subjected to wind forces as a single standing tree. If you’re going to grow a giant tree by itself and mow everything around it, that’s not “naturally occurring”…and you’ll have problems that affect neighbors, thus the required maintenance. Forests don’t require “maintenance.” Urban, singular, enormous trees do. Suckers should be removed, the canopy thinned etc etc. Get read. |
Some trees, like birches, often drop smaller branches. There isn't anything to maintain. The part of the tree that is the neighbor's yard is the neighbor's responsibility. It is unlikely that this situation involves large branches that are dangerous. I had a neighbor do exactly this for a birch tree. On occasion I threw a few back but mostly ignored him. He was an azz and also cut back several of my trees on my property over a foot in to my fence. |
Maintaining a tree so it looks nice is one thing, but there is no obligation to keep a tree from dropping debris and there is no obligation to even keep the tree healthy. You are not obliged to spend 1 dollar maintaining a tree - but you do need to remove a sick or dying tree if it poses a threat to life or property. I don’t know how some people here live in society. |
|
At least in Maryland the general rule is anything that falls from a tree on one side of the line to property on the other side of the line is the problem/responsibility of the receiving owner.
Surprised me. |