It was a SL poster who claimed IB was superior to AP. No one else had said anything about "IB vs AP" before that. |
It's more often the case that the AP schools around IB schools are more likely to be closed to transfers now. |
IB/AP is the biggest reason for pupil placement at the high school level |
Yes that's what I mean so the only schools open to them are not that great. So unless your parents can move, it's IB, |
She said she thought IB prepared her better than AP did for some of her friends back in the day (which is more of an opinion than a claim) and yes people took offense to it. I think that's less controversial than the "IB doesn't attract the brightest" poster upthread. Like I said-I don't think one is superior to the other. I think it's a silly argument. There are pros/cons for each. I have one kid who would probably flourish in IB and loves the humanities. And another who would be better served in an AP school. |
The SL graduate's claim that she was better prepared for college coursework by IB was conjecture. The statement that IB schools attract a disproportionately small number of the county's top students is backed up by facts. |
There are very few schools with IB. It is not a magnet program that people can apply for. The fact that the schools with lower FARMs rates and ESL rates have a higher test scores and the like is a fact. Had FCPS placed IB at Chantilly or Langley or McLean you would be singing a different tune. Kids at IB schools have many great opportunities, they are different then the kids at AP schools but there are still a large number of great outcomes. Comparing high SES schools to Lower SES schools is comparing apples to oranges. And I would not want to be gloating about test scores the way you are, essentially you are mocking kids who have fewer opportunities to succeed due to a lack of finances and/or parental background that influences educational outcomes. You sound like an elitist snob. |
Reston isn't poor, for the most part. While there is some poverty, houses there are quite expensive. It just has a high school that's saddled with an academic program that on balance is a net negative when it comes to attracting families with higher-achieving kids. Your hypothesis is silly because Chantilly, Oakton, Langley, and McLean families wouldn't roll over and allow FCPS to replace AP with IB. They tried that at Woodson years ago, and the parents successfully pushed back. |
It’s you again. Every thread. Give it a rest. |
Why? —HHS parent |
IB is in a third of FCPS high schools. That doesn't qualify as 'very few'. |
+1. They can also do IB for some programs without doing the full diploma - my kid is doing this at Marshall. |
Oh please. We all know that if IB had always preexisted at Langley and McLean, they'd be praising how IB provides their children a European education, and how they're now considering Oxford and Zurich for study abroad, and how they're such great writers now. |
| They placed IB at the poorer schools to try to attract higher SES students so they could being up test scores overall at the schools. It didn’t work. IB is very LA based so a lot of the math/STEM kids don’t want it. |
You can’t seriously be asking this question. |