Best advice on here by far. |
| Bumping up this old thread… Please share any recent experiences related to Poolesville Global Ecology program. Likes? Dislikes? Thank you. |
|
Global Ecology
Likes: Nice Peer Group Field Trips Advanced Science and Math Electives Academically focused peer group in nonmagnet electives (2/3 of school is in one of 3 test- in magnets) Country Setting Embedding environmental stewardship into curriculum Dislikes: School Construction Far (from everything) Requires AP Seminar/Research |
What's wrong with AP Research/Seminar? |
In our household, it led to lots of nagging since my kid is a procrastinator. In terms of intellectual development, I’m sure it’s great though. |
| AP Research/Seminar are hard! Lots of writing, analysis. It's like writing a thesis each year. |
Construction's almost done for the classrooms. |
|
Child chose RMIB last year over Global and regrets it. Has friends in Global who are having a really fun time and learning a lot. We had one of the kids over the other day and they stayed for dinner and it seems like the high school experience we'd have really loved for our own child.
We didn't really understand the program that well as it is farther away so it was our mistake. |
What are the drawbacks of RMIB? Our kid liked the poolesville house theme + smaller school but if you didn't have that specific interest, I would think RM would be a good choice. |
|
Just FYI, students in PHS Global take AP Seminar as Freshman but then can choose to take the Project Lead The Way path or do an internship instead of doing AP Research.
The program is really nicely balanced - plenty of ways to pursue rigor but the field trips and camaraderie are really great. |
I'm that PP and while it's a very strong program academically it's just really boring. There's nothing special to distinguish it whereas Poolesville has personality and so does Blair. |
In my opinion, PLTW is an overhyped program at PHS where the students don’t really learn much. My older GE student was in it and it was a waste of time. My younger one is taking much more rigorous electives instead like AP Chem/Physics. We’ve seen multiple families (agree with their feet)where the older one takes PLTW and the younger one doesn’t. It’s a “social experiment” at PHS. A large number of the kids in the program are very average non-magnet students. They “sell” the program to both groups. |
|
PP again- Just want to clarify my comment, Since ISP is the program for local students, there are kids all across board in the program in terms of academic achievement.
There are some very bright ISP students but the PLTW program is not built just for top local achievers plus magnet. It’s more of an “everyone” that is interested program. |
I completely disagree. My PLTW students did well in the classes and received college credit that actually transferred and had a few schools offer a extra PLTW subsidized scholarship. Most importantly, they were able to gain clarity on college major. I should add that both of my GE/PLTW students also took AP Chem, AP Physics 1&2, AP Calc BC, Multivariable and AP Physics C. Very easy to carve a path of max rigor and include PLTW. |
Interesting. My kid is completely not interested in it and was feeling bad for not going that route! |