Is Boebert going to lose?

Anonymous
Good thread on this from the politics reporter at the Pueblo local newspaper.
Anonymous
Very funny but hearing that McCarthy is praying she loses.
Anonymous
Isn't she up by like 500 now?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Very funny but hearing that McCarthy is praying she loses.


I totally believe he is praying very hard for this. Better to give up the seat than have her as a disruptor.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Isn't she up by like 500 now?


The tallies are going to go up and down in a jerky fashion as various counties report. NYT interactive is here:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/11/08/us/elections/results-colorado-us-house-district-3.html


Boebert is up, but as of this post, only the following counties have <95% of the votes tallied:

- Pueblo at 93% in
- Garfield at 90% in
- Pitkin at 80% in

So those votes are still incoming. All three counties lean Democrat, with Pueblo +8 Frisch, Garfield +14 Frisch, and Pitkin +58 Frisch.

Anonymous
Another batch came in. With 96% reported, Boebert is up 794 votes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Another batch came in. With 96% reported, Boebert is up 794 votes.


Right. Where are the as yet unreported votes going to be coming from?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Another batch came in. With 96% reported, Boebert is up 794 votes.


Right. Where are the as yet unreported votes going to be coming from?


The district is comprised of the following counties:
Alamosa, Archuleta, Chaffee, Conejos, Costilla, Custer, Delta, Dolores, Eagle, Garfield, Grand, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Huerfano, Jackson, Lake, La Plata, Mesa, Mineral, Moffat, Montezuma, Montrose, Ouray, Park, Pitkin, Pueblo, Rio Blanco, Rio Grande, Routt, Saguache, San Juan, San Miguel, and Summit counties, as well as portions of Douglas, Fremont, and Jefferson counties.

None of the counties are reporting 100% reported. But the bigger counties that have outstanding votes are Garfield (95% reported), La Plata (95%), Mesa (95%), Pitkin (95%), Pueblo (95%), Routt (95%), and Summit (95%). All of these, BUT Mesa are leaning Democratic in this election. Mesa is the only one of the bigger outstanding counties that is leaning Republican.
Anonymous
Thanks.
Anonymous
Dave Wasserman “I’ve seen enough”ed this race and then deleted the tweet.
Anonymous
And they had her as a slam dunk @ 95%. This is sweet justice. I think the GOP may actually start rethinking their toxic brand after these results across the board.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:And they had her as a slam dunk @ 95%. This is sweet justice. I think the GOP may actually start rethinking their toxic brand after these results across the board.


A win is a win. Nobody cares or even remembers how close it was.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:And they had her as a slam dunk @ 95%. This is sweet justice. I think the GOP may actually start rethinking their toxic brand after these results across the board.

No they won’t. She’ll be back to crowing her usual nonsense even if she wins by 1 vote.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And they had her as a slam dunk @ 95%. This is sweet justice. I think the GOP may actually start rethinking their toxic brand after these results across the board.

No they won’t. She’ll be back to crowing her usual nonsense even if she wins by 1 vote.

+1 She doesn’t know how to do anything else.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And they had her as a slam dunk @ 95%. This is sweet justice. I think the GOP may actually start rethinking their toxic brand after these results across the board.

No they won’t. She’ll be back to crowing her usual nonsense even if she wins by 1 vote.

+1 She doesn’t know how to do anything else.

Oh wait she knows how to blame other people
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: