It’s going to be interesting to see how it plays out. GT for our elementary was a feather in the cap for parents and nothing more. |
Why kill it when instead the problem is improved earlier elementary education to prepare those? |
Because APS doesn’t actually believe in equity? It’s a race to the bottom. If we hold kids to high standards and they fail to meet them, we need to lower the standards. Too bad for those who reach or excel past those standards. You don’t get what you need either. I’m happy Duran is willing to make it happen, but I’m worried it won’t last. |
This is not the only reason. Studies have shown that students will be more engaged if they pick the novels they read, so teachers are encouraged to give choices. Also, there are always parents who disapprove of certain novels, so picking just one book for the whole class often doesn't work well. Lastly, APS MS students aren't studying the classics yet--when APS students get to high school, they will study selected classic novels as a group. |
On the subject of novels, it varies by kid. Not just choice of book, but whether they are assigned the whole book or excerpts, and the scope of questions they are asked. Kids in the same class can be doing different assignments on the same subject matter, depending on their abilities and interest. |
Maybe, but its hard to have much analysis or deep discussion of themes of a novel if every person has read a different one -- I doubt the teacher has even read all the novels her class has read, so what is the opportunity for a deeper dive there or even to know they read the novel rather than just the wikipedia page on it? |
Emphasis on "selected" - 'cause they're extremely FEW. |
Bot everyone starts APS in kindergarten. Many people move here while their children are of varying school ages; and they're coming from lots of different backgrounds, languages, education levels. Still, I agree with you that better preparation in general is needed in ES so there can be more rigorous standards in MS and in MS so we can have more rigorous standards and higher expectations in HS. But, it's just so much easier and less expensive to lower the standards and expectations for everyone instead.... |
I hated group novels. Got far more out of discussions on a novel the whole class was reading than I ever got out of any of the novels read in groups. Group presentations and short re-enactments of plays just aren't deep dives (or even medium dives) into individual pieces of literature. Much more in-depth discussion and analysis and thought occurs when the class reads through a book together; and then that analysis and thought can be applied to the next novel a student reads whether for class or for individual interest. |
But not so much the outdoors. Most PE is held indoors. Even in high school. |
That is not our experience at all. |
If the teacher asks students to show evidence from their novel of a main character's traits, for example, citing specific examples verbatim, they are not going to find their answer on wikipedia. This does represent a deeper dive into characterization, which is one of the concepts taught in MS. And yes, many teachers DO read all the books they assign. Why do you assume the worst of APS teachers? |
If this is the Fairfax honors model, run the other direction. The only intensified class in reality is Math. The differences between the rest of the academics are very small, if any. Opt-in is exactly that. |
Yep. It’s a way to placate parents wanting more challenge for their kids “they are in all honors, they are fine” |