| When I worked at Fannie over 50 I put in 24k and they matched 24k |
I agree. And you're one of them! Let's just run the numbers shall we?!?! Let's say that OP is 47 years old and has been investing the absolute maximum employee contribution into a 401k for 25 years AND has been receiving the absolute maximum employer contribution for 25 years AND has been maxing out IRA contributions for 25 years. This is EXTREMLY difficult to do, BTW, since most employers come nowhere close to contributing the maximum amount. Let’s not also forget that 25 years ago the max employee, employer, and IRA contributions were $9,500.00, $20,500.00, and $2,000.00, respectively. Let’s also assume that OP has been earning a very respectable 8% YoY return on all contributions over 25 years. The retirement savings contributions break down as follows: A = Contribution Year B = Max 401k Employee Contribution in Year A C = Max 401k Employer Contribution in Year A D = Max IRA Contribution in Year A E = B + C + D in 2022 dollars after YoY compunding since Year A A | B | C | D | E 1997 | $9,500.00 |$20,500.00 | $2,000.00 | $219,151.21 1998 | $10,000.00 | $20,000.00 | $2,000.00 | $202,917.78 1999 | $10,000.00 | $20,000.00 | $2,000.00 | $187,886.84 2000 | $10,500.00 | $19,500.00 | $2,000.00 | $173,969.29 2001 | $10,500.00 | $24,500.00 | $2,000.00 | $186,251.85 2002 | $11,000.00 | $29,000.00 | $3,000.00 | $200,421.16 2003 | $12,000.00 | $28,000.00 | $3,000.00 | $185,575.15 2004 | $13,000.00 | $28,000.00 | $3,000.00 | $175,824.86 2005 | $14,000.00 | $28,000.00 | $4,000.00 | $170,200.83 2006 | $15,000.00 | $29,000.00 | $4,000.00 | $164,445.25 2007 | $15,500.00 | $29,500.00 | $4,000.00 | $155,436.29 2008 | $15,500.00 | $30,500.00 | $5,000.00 | $149,796.87 2009 | $16,500.00 | $32,500.00 | $5,000.00 | $146,859.68 2010 | $16,500.00 | $32,500.00 | $5,000.00 | $135,981.19 2011 | $16,500.00 | $32,500.00 | $5,000.00 | $125,908.51 2012 | $17,000.00 | $33,000.00 | $5,000.00 | $118,740.87 2013 | $17,500.00 | $33,500.00 | $5,500.00 | $112,943.76 2014 | $17,500.00 | $34,500.00 | $5,500.00 | $106,428.49 2015 | $18,000.00 | $35,000.00 | $5,500.00 | $100,258.72 2016 | $18,000.00 | $35,000.00 | $5,500.00 | $92,832.15 2017 | $18,000.00 | $36,000.00 | $5,500.00 | $87,425.02 2018 | $18,500.00 | $36,500.00 | $5,500.00 | $82,309.58 2019 | $19,000.00 | $37,000.00 | $6,000.00 | $78,102.14 2020 | $19,500.00 | $37,500.00 | $6,000.00 | $73,483.20 2021 | $19,500.00 | $38,500.00 | $6,000.00 | $69,120.00 2022 | $20,500.00 | $40,500.00 | $6,000.00 | $67,000.00 TOTAL = $3,569,270.68 Even with 25 years of maximum savings and very optimistic returns, a single person cannot have anything close to $5M! If OP is only 42, then the first five rows are all zero, which cuts out nearly $1M from what they could have down to more like $$2.6M. In the more likely scenario that your employer is matching up to 50% of ALL your contributions vs. the federal maximum, the total for a 47 year old becomes only $1.9M. Even doubled for two spouses maxing out for 25 years at this rate isn't even $4M!!! So, OP, don't believe the so-called outliers on DCUM. You should know that they are outright liars. The math is irrefutable. You're doing great. Stay the course. |
The real S&P 500 is at 4,152 right now. Ten years ago it was about 1,400. That is 297% growth over ten years which equates to 11.5% YoY growth. How has your magical S&P 500 generated 13.9%? Oh right, it hasn't. You're full of it. And, I might add, that OP is in their early 40s, just like you, which means you've both been compounding since 2000 or so. The S&P 500 YoY growth since 2000 has only been 5.9%. Learn to do some math before making silly claims that confirm your stupidity. |
Uhhh...nice try. Thanks to a PP, we know that the 401k contribution limits 20 years ago were $11K + $29K = $40K. How did you start at $60K 20 years ago?!?! 2002 | $11,000.00 | $29,000.00 | $3,000.00 | $200,421.16 |
Pretty sure PPP means they started at a salary of $60k ~20 years ago, since they were expressing contributions as a percentage of income. |
Okay. Well, that makes this tall tale of having $2M in an retirement account by the age of 40 even more far fetched. |
|
You are doing great - the important thing is that you are on track to meet your goals and be comfortable in retirement. It's not important to keep up with the Jones'.
Also, keep in mind that the stuff you read on here is not necessarily true. In fact, I would say 90% of the people lie about their finances. Make sure you keep in mind that this is anonymous board full of liars and then don't feel bad. You're doing great!! |
One thing your analysis doesn't take into account is the ability some have to do post-tax savings into their 401k. My portion is something like 20% to 25%. Would have to look up to find the exact percentage. I am strictly buy and hold but someone with good intuitions and conviction to act could have actually done quite well. For example in July 2007, I thought an implosion in the financial sector was coming and mused it was a good time to go all in on governments. (October 2007would have been the ideal time.) In March 2009, my view was we were past the crisis and if I had made that move in 2007, March 2009 would have been a great time to go back all in on equities. |
Add in the employer match and it's more. And around here there are people with 403bs and 457 plans each where you can contribute the maximum to each. So you get match+19500+19500 year in/year out. |
No, you are mistaken. It is true that an employee can contribute beyond the stated employee maximums with after-tax dollars (even with pre-tax dollars into a non-qualified plan, usually with early withdrawal requirements), but these contributions are essentially taken away from the available employer contribution limits such that the total still cannot exceed the limits stated in the tables above. Beyond this, you’re looking at an HSA for retirement, maybe a 529 if you want to take a hit on using it for non-education purposes, or just a taxable brokerage account. |
They said they contributed post-tax. Which doesn't fall into maximums (though I don't know why someone would do it, I guess except for asset protection). Also they have an employer that contributes 100% up to 12% which is a VERY generous match. |
But, you are right that it is very possible to beat the S&P 500 and aggressively grow your portfolio through active management. The moment Trump announced the restrictions on European travel at the start of COVID-19, I immediately rebalanced 100% of our family’s 401k portfolios into a stable-value fund. A stock market crash was imminent! It’s not uncommon for a major crash to see the DJIA lose about 1/4 to 1/3rd it’s value. When the DJIA dropped below 20,000 I rebalanced everything back to a large-cap growth index fund and left it there until the DJIA regained its previous peak value. After this, I rebalanced again and put my portfolio back to its original allocations. Currently we have double the amount in our 401k portfolios as compared to January 2020, not including subsequent contributions and even considering the decline since November 2021. This is NOT what all the financial advisors recommend and it is not for the faint of heart. |
No, no, no!! See: https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2022/02/15/this-401k-option-can-be-a-game-changer-for-big-savers.html Although the 401(k) deferral limit for 2022 is $20,500 if you're under 50, you can use after-tax contributions to save up to $61,000, including employer matches, profit sharing and other plan deposits. Clearly, we don’t really have a bunch of big savers on DCUM, else we would all be intimately familiar with these limits. |
Reread the OP and everything I wrote. |
| OP, you’re doing great. We never had a formula other than saving as much as we could while living comfortably but well below our means. We always did that! If we got a big bonus, it went into savings. If we got a big company equity pay out it went into savings. Our life style changed modesty but nicely over that 30+ year period. Our kids graduated debt free and it wasn’t a huge burden on us. We are now retired with enough resources so that we probably give away as much as we spend on ourselves. |