I get it. But again what is there to discuss? Unfortunately all we have left is fuming over insane policies. |
|
Why is that? You know the vaccines don't do much to protect against symptomatic disease, and there's no evidence they protect against severe disease in this age group? |
This is not true. Scroll down to the 10:20 AM update. https://www.statnews.com/2022/06/15/tracking-an-fda-advisory-panel-meeting-on-covid-vaccines-in-young-children/ |
Also the vaccine helps reduce pressure on the hospitals, so it’s for the societal good. |
This was an interesting tidbit from that section: “But there was also a problem researchers didn’t expect when they designed the study. The parents of very little children, those younger than 2 years old, didn’t want to bring them in for sick visits during the Omicron wave. That meant they couldn’t get the PCR results that Moderna was using as the main measure of Covid in the study.” Why on earth would you sign up for a vaccine trial if you were t willing to get your kid tested when needed?? This is baffling to me. |
The confidence interval in that slide is enormous. It means you can't make heads or tails of the data. Sorry, that's extremely weak if that's your "evidence." |
There is no evidence that the vaccine reduces severe disease in young kids at this point--absolutely none. Go ahead and read through the FDA briefing documents and see for yourself. Severe disease leads to hospitalization. Sorry, that claim is just wrong. |
It is truly shocking how oblivious democrats are to what they are doing. The economist has an issue this week with the cover “wake up, democrats!” You should read it. |
The confidence interval is 32.4-67.9; i.e. well above 0. The vaccine clearly prevents infection. |
How long does it prevent infection? For the couple of weeks that the trial followed the kids? Should toddlers be getting boosters every few months because vaccine efficacy wanes so quickly? |
Don't even know why I'm biting, but sure. A booster every 6 months or so. Why not? In the link, it shows that the immune response to the vaccine is consistent across all age groups. Are you saying adults shouldn't get the vaccine? |
I'm saying that the risks of covid to young children are far lower than the risks of covid for adults--by several orders of magnitude. Therefore the risk/benefit calculation of vaccination and repeated boosters is extremely different. Should my elderly parents keep getting boosters? Probably, because the risk of death and severe disease of covid are so high for that age group. Should my healthy toddler who likely has already been exposed to the virus get vaccinated and get endless boosters when there doesn't seem to be a clear benefit and the risks to him from the virus are so low? Probably not. |
Our preschool in NWDC is not requiring but strongly encouraging. My kids (both under 5) already had their first shot. I assume most of the other kids at the school have, too, based on the neighborhood leanings. |
The risk of covid to young children may be low, but it is not zero. There are thousands of children who have died worldwide from covid, and many more who have had MIS-C or other severe cases. Yes, that number is very low, but what if it was your kid and you could have prevented it with the vaccine? So why not get the vaccine? I don't see the downside. |