Hamilton RD?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, DC admitted regular decision.


First, congrats! Second, do you mind sharing stats as well as if your DC did ED1/2?


DC didn't do ED1/2. 3.4 UW/3.9W, 34 ACT, pointy/niche ECs. Full pay.


THIS is why people get upset. These stats are low - that GPA shouldn’t get a kid into a top SLAC.


Oh hush. DP here. Why are you reducing PP’s child to numbers? You know nothing about them or the rigor of their classes.


We can tell about the class rigor - pp have weighted and unweighted gpa listed so we know exactly the rigor and it’s not worthy. Sorry if you don’t like the honesty but if you are going to post your kids stats and brag, you should be able to handle a little backlash if those stats make your kid seems less than worthy of an admitted school. Dont post particulars if you don’t want feedback.


You don’t know the rigor unless you sat in your class.

Sorry you are hurting today. But taking your hurt and anger out on an anonymous child won’t help. Maybe call a friend to let your steam off.


I am a DP and agree that was said bluntly and not sure I agree with it anyway but it wasn’t an insult to the child, it was a comment on the stats and the admissions criteria for a college like Hamilton. Objectively I bet that GPA is low for Hamilton, even if acvieved via rigorous courses. But obviously the student had other interesting things going in that Hamilton likes, which is great and imo a cornerstone of the smaller more personal experience one gets at any small LAC.


+100.


It's my DC who got in. Didn't post the WGPA because it would disclose the school and my kid. Suffice to say my kid took 10% APs, is super-smart, and applied to a humanities major. Made him different. And he had done all the extracurriculars to back that up as a sincere interest. You people think that all this is a numbers game, but it's not. The numbers are the minimum to get you considered, but they don't get you admitted. My kid is incredibly smart, does well in classes he cares about (but not the others), applied to a real humanities program (English lit.), and has a totally authentic story to tell about why he would want to study at Hamilton (including continued study with an unusual language that they probably want to get students studying). All you parents seem to care about is selectivity, not fit. I don't mean this critically, as opposed to sympathetically, but you really don't understand how students get accepted to schools and why.


Your DC sounds a lot like mine (right down to the major and the language), only mine didn't get in. I know your DC will be amazing and love it there. Congratulations!
Anonymous
honestly applying to Hamilton is probably a waste of time if you’re not an athlete or a URM
Anonymous
Just saw an article that said Hamilton’s acceptance rate was 11.4 percent this year. Almost 10,000 applications, for a very small school that is a lot of applications. I know Colby’s acceptance rate very low this year, and probably other NESCAC schools too. As a NESCAC alum, I’m glad to see they are still popular, but for our kids it makes it very tough…
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, DC admitted regular decision.


First, congrats! Second, do you mind sharing stats as well as if your DC did ED1/2?


DC didn't do ED1/2. 3.4 UW/3.9W, 34 ACT, pointy/niche ECs. Full pay.


THIS is why people get upset. These stats are low - that GPA shouldn’t get a kid into a top SLAC.


Oh hush. DP here. Why are you reducing PP’s child to numbers? You know nothing about them or the rigor of their classes.


Plenty of other kids got better grades in rigorous classes. Try again.


Yes, but they're one-dimensional, gpa-chasing, a-holes like their parents. PP's kid is obviously valuable and seen as a student who will thrive and contribute to the community in positive ways. Not just a numbers chaser. Such small-minded, horrible people around here.
Anonymous
Let's just suppose that Hamilton (or Amherst, Williams, Middlebury etc) has had excellent experience with students they've admitted from certain elite DC schools (public or private) that have GPAs on the low end of their average. Typically, those kids with also have very high test scores (34+, 1500+), and be accomplished in something or multiple things that will redound to the benefit of the institution. Plus full pay. Though schools like Hamilton profess to be need-blind, they still somehow manage to admit half of the class as full-pay students, and nothing wrong with that. Someone's got to keep the lights on. Let's also say that Hamilton and its ilk get thousands application from 3.9 kids from mediocre schools, with much lower SAT/ACT scores. And while there are of course exceptions to the rule, the rule is that those kids don't perform as well in college as the lower-GPA elite high school kids.
When you look at a Naviance scattergram from one of these high-end high schools (and I have), you'll see that the admitted cohort is in a GPA range significantly below the college's published average. But its test scores are at the high end. So what does that say? Maybe something about grade inflation, and maybe something about the academic and other talents of kids who have had fortunate upbringings. Ask a NESCAC admissions officer, on deep background (because they'll never admit it publicly), to verify this. I don't know if they will, but I know they can.
Anonymous
Full-pay is king
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, DC admitted regular decision.


First, congrats! Second, do you mind sharing stats as well as if your DC did ED1/2?


DC didn't do ED1/2. 3.4 UW/3.9W, 34 ACT, pointy/niche ECs. Full pay.


THIS is why people get upset. These stats are low - that GPA shouldn’t get a kid into a top SLAC.


NP: Do you have any idea how incredibly rude you are?


Might be rude — doesn’t make them wrong.

I suspect it was equal parts student athlete/full pay
Anonymous
If you read up on Hamilton, one of the things they emphasize and that alums emphasize is how important writing is at Hamilton. My child got in RD to Hamilton and I wouldn’t be surprised if the essays pushed them into the accept pile. They had high gpa, very high SAT, good extracurriculars, and I think excellent references. They were not an athlete. I think their essays rang true with the rest of the application and painted a clear picture of who they were.

One of the things you can control is your essays. Many high stats kids are very good writers. Not all high stats kids are excellent writers who have developed their own style. I think that is what helped our student get in. A huge amount of time and effort went into the essays and it was time well spent.
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: