Anna Sorokin and her terrible style

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t get over how chubby and plain looking she is. And yeah her hair is bad.

I don't see chubby but then again I worry about the young women of today who are taught to believe that size 0 is the goal.

+1

She just has a round face.

Women always hate chubby in a face, but it’s young and healthy and seems to always appeal to men.

Not always. Next to her friend, she looks like a grandma. Also, her chubby face comes along with a wide waist.

Okaaay…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t get over how chubby and plain looking she is. And yeah her hair is bad.

I don't see chubby but then again I worry about the young women of today who are taught to believe that size 0 is the goal.

Size zero is a size 12 from the 60s so yeh not unreasonable or unrealistic goal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t get over how chubby and plain looking she is. And yeah her hair is bad.

I don't see chubby but then again I worry about the young women of today who are taught to believe that size 0 is the goal.

Size zero is a size 12 from the 60s so yeh not unreasonable or unrealistic goal

False.

[Anonymous]

She and the rubber swindler should go get married and scam each other to death

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SHE'S RUSSIAN, NOT GERMAN. She may have moved to Germany and grew up there. But, she is neither German or an Heiress.

she was pretending to be german - calm down and stop screaming ie shut up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looked like she straight-ironed very processed/damaged hair without using heat protectant.

I will not judge her hair during the trial because it's already been stated she didn't have access to hair dryers or flat irons or hair products.

Rich people have very clean, shiny, healthy hair. It’s an immediate tell.

Nah. Good hair is just genetic, and I know people of every class that have both good and bad hair. There's only so much you can do topically.

I come from an upper class family and have horrible hair---thin, frizzy, dull.
I had nothing to do with the family I was born to or the hair I was born with.

But you have the actual means and time to correct it. She did not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looked like she straight-ironed very processed/damaged hair without using heat protectant.

I will not judge her hair during the trial because it's already been stated she didn't have access to hair dryers or flat irons or hair products.

Rich people have very clean, shiny, healthy hair. It’s an immediate tell.

Nah. Good hair is just genetic, and I know people of every class that have both good and bad hair. There's only so much you can do topically.

I come from an upper class family and have horrible hair---thin, frizzy, dull.
I had nothing to do with the family I was born to or the hair I was born with.

But you have the actual means and time to correct it. She did not.

She certainly did. She was paying thousands of dollars a night for her hotel. She had money, she just only spent it on things that were important to her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t get over how chubby and plain looking she is. And yeah her hair is bad.

I don't see chubby but then again I worry about the young women of today who are taught to believe that size 0 is the goal.

Size zero is a size 12 from the 60s so yeh not unreasonable or unrealistic goal

WTF!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looked like she straight-ironed very processed/damaged hair without using heat protectant.

I will not judge her hair during the trial because it's already been stated she didn't have access to hair dryers or flat irons or hair products.

Rich people have very clean, shiny, healthy hair. It’s an immediate tell.

Nah. Good hair is just genetic, and I know people of every class that have both good and bad hair. There's only so much you can do topically.

I come from an upper class family and have horrible hair---thin, frizzy, dull.
I had nothing to do with the family I was born to or the hair I was born with.

But you have the actual means and time to correct it. She did not.

Her looks are also important to her, but there's a low self-monitoring and unbelievable over confidence. She probably thought her hair was amazing and that she didn't need any haircut or a treatment.
She certainly did. She was paying thousands of dollars a night for her hotel. She had money, she just only spent it on things that were important to her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looked like she straight-ironed very processed/damaged hair without using heat protectant.

I will not judge her hair during the trial because it's already been stated she didn't have access to hair dryers or flat irons or hair products.

Rich people have very clean, shiny, healthy hair. It’s an immediate tell.

Nah. Good hair is just genetic, and I know people of every class that have both good and bad hair. There's only so much you can do topically.

I come from an upper class family and have horrible hair---thin, frizzy, dull.
I had nothing to do with the family I was born to or the hair I was born with.

But you have the actual means and time to correct it. She did not.

She certainly did. She was paying thousands of dollars a night for her hotel. She had money, she just only spent it on things that were important to her.

Her looks are also important to her, but there's a low self-monitoring and unbelievable over confidence. She probably thought her hair was amazing and that she didn't need any haircut or a treatment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looked like she straight-ironed very processed/damaged hair without using heat protectant.

I will not judge her hair during the trial because it's already been stated she didn't have access to hair dryers or flat irons or hair products.

Rich people have very clean, shiny, healthy hair. It’s an immediate tell.

Nah. Good hair is just genetic, and I know people of every class that have both good and bad hair. There's only so much you can do topically.

I come from an upper class family and have horrible hair---thin, frizzy, dull.
I had nothing to do with the family I was born to or the hair I was born with.

But you have the actual means and time to correct it. She did not.

She certainly did. She was paying thousands of dollars a night for her hotel. She had money, she just only spent it on things that were important to her.

Her looks are also important to her, but there's a low self-monitoring and unbelievable over confidence. She probably thought her hair was amazing and that she didn't need any haircut or a treatment.

Seriously, her hair did not bring her down. Your premise is crap. You can’t prove she doesn’t *look* rich because none of us would know who she was if that were true. Whatever passing for rich looks like, she actually succeeded, so may as well emulate that.

I’ll postulate, the personality plays a much bigger role. So all these threads, and all your body dismorphism are for naught.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SHE'S RUSSIAN, NOT GERMAN. She may have moved to Germany and grew up there. But, she is neither German or an Heiress.

Really? Why doesn't anyone know this? They should make a documentary series or have some news articles about it! I have a friend at Netflix - let me get on to them!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looked like she straight-ironed very processed/damaged hair without using heat protectant.

I will not judge her hair during the trial because it's already been stated she didn't have access to hair dryers or flat irons or hair products.

Rich people have very clean, shiny, healthy hair. It’s an immediate tell.

Nah. Good hair is just genetic, and I know people of every class that have both good and bad hair. There's only so much you can do topically.

I come from an upper class family and have horrible hair---thin, frizzy, dull.
I had nothing to do with the family I was born to or the hair I was born with.

But you have the actual means and time to correct it. She did not.

She certainly did. She was paying thousands of dollars a night for her hotel. She had money, she just only spent it on things that were important to her.

Her looks are also important to her, but there's a low self-monitoring and unbelievable over confidence. She probably thought her hair was amazing and that she didn't need any haircut or a treatment.

Seriously, her hair did not bring her down. Your premise is crap. You can’t prove she doesn’t *look* rich because none of us would know who she was if that were true. Whatever passing for rich looks like, she actually succeeded, so may as well emulate that.

I’ll postulate, the personality plays a much bigger role. So all these threads, and all your body dismorphism are for naught.

I agree with you and was commenting strictly about her "spending money on things that were important to her".
No need to be dramatic and pull "body dimorphism" any time anyone tries to evaluate beauty or fashion on um...Beauty and Fashion forum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looked like she straight-ironed very processed/damaged hair without using heat protectant.

I will not judge her hair during the trial because it's already been stated she didn't have access to hair dryers or flat irons or hair products.

Rich people have very clean, shiny, healthy hair. It’s an immediate tell.

Nah. Good hair is just genetic, and I know people of every class that have both good and bad hair. There's only so much you can do topically.

I come from an upper class family and have horrible hair---thin, frizzy, dull.
I had nothing to do with the family I was born to or the hair I was born with.

But you have the actual means and time to correct it. She did not.

She certainly did. She was paying thousands of dollars a night for her hotel. She had money, she just only spent it on things that were important to her.

When I read the story she wasn't paying anything - she was getting others to pay for her. How is your comment relevant?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looked like she straight-ironed very processed/damaged hair without using heat protectant.

I will not judge her hair during the trial because it's already been stated she didn't have access to hair dryers or flat irons or hair products.

Rich people have very clean, shiny, healthy hair. It’s an immediate tell.

Nah. Good hair is just genetic, and I know people of every class that have both good and bad hair. There's only so much you can do topically.

I come from an upper class family and have horrible hair---thin, frizzy, dull.
I had nothing to do with the family I was born to or the hair I was born with.

But you have the actual means and time to correct it. She did not.

She certainly did. She was paying thousands of dollars a night for her hotel. She had money, she just only spent it on things that were important to her.

When I read the story she wasn't paying anything - she was getting others to pay for her. How is your comment relevant?

Whether the money was legitimately hers, or funds she bilked from other people, she spent it on things that were important to her. and added lustre to her image She had the "time and means to correct [her hair]" but she didn't choose to, as having great hair is not actually a wealthy "tell". That's what I'm addressing. How is your comment relevant?