Kendall Jenner is a terrible model

[Anonymous]

Good models, like good athletes or good actors, must be highly intelligent in order to succeed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her runway walk is horrendous. I can say this as someone who worked in the modeling industry for years, but I’ve seen it on social media for years, about how bad it is!!

can you explain more? It's fascinating for me, since I have no idea what this industry is like. What is wrong with her walk?

She’s extremely two dimensional. Usually very stiff, awkward, etc. Watch some videos of the greats - Naomi Campbell, Gisele Bundchen, Coco Rocha. She doesn’t need to be as good as them, but she’s not even near their level yet is “ranked” amongst them and has been given huge opportunities that other models would have been more deserving of talent wise. If she wasn’t a Jenner/Kardashian she 100% would be no where in modeling.

[Anonymous]

Kendall Jenner used to be the highest paid model…I wonder if this still holds true.

She is obviously very beautiful but considering her sisters are so plastic I wonder if she has had any “work” done.
She wasn’t very beautiful as a child -> teenager.
She was just cute I suppose.
But once she became a full-fledged adult she became a stunner in my opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kendall Jenner used to be the highest paid model…I wonder if this still holds true.

She is obviously very beautiful but considering her sisters are so plastic I wonder if she has had any “work” done.
She wasn’t very beautiful as a child -> teenager.
She was just cute I suppose.
But once she became a full-fledged adult she became a stunner in my opinion.

She’s had plenty of work done. Just look it up! Fox eyebrow lift, lip injections etc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her runway walk is horrendous. I can say this as someone who worked in the modeling industry for years, but I’ve seen it on social media for years, about how bad it is!!

can you explain more? It's fascinating for me, since I have no idea what this industry is like. What is wrong with her walk?

She’s extremely two dimensional. Usually very stiff, awkward, etc. Watch some videos of the greats - Naomi Campbell, Gisele Bundchen, Coco Rocha. She doesn’t need to be as good as them, but she’s not even near their level yet is “ranked” amongst them and has been given huge opportunities that other models would have been more deserving of talent wise. If she wasn’t a Jenner/Kardashian she 100% would be no where in modeling.

I see what you mean now! Completely agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think she’s absolutely gorgeous.

I agree. And to compare her with her fake plastic surger-ied sisters? No comparison at all. She's incredible looking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nope you got it all wrong. Kendall looks like Kendall off the runway and cover of Vogue. That's unique. She's all Jenner. Other K's don't hold a candle to her.

+1
To even lump her in that clown car of Kardashians is ridiculous. She isn't a Kardashian, thank goodness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gigi Hadid looks like she is 40.

I feel that way about Bella Hadid. Gigi is so gorgeous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think she's very intelligent. I think that is why she comes off as so vacant. She's beautiful and has a famous family so she doesn't have to try though.

She's plain. I agree that she's vacant.
She's tall enough, skinny and famous. That makes you a model these days.

Very plain and forgettable. She has the same dead eyes that Kourtney has.

[Anonymous]

Stunning, famous, richer than hades, young, healthy, has a great manager, laughing all the way to the bank. Will continue to become more and more rich and famous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not that anyone cares, but I think she's very conventional looking and wouldn't be a top model without her famous family. Of course she's very pretty, but in a forgettable, almost generic way. The memorable models I can think of were very pretty but had something unusual in their features that make them instantly recognizable (Gigi Hadid, Kate Moss, Miranda Kerr, Gisele, Naomi). She doesn't have that.

THIS. Add Princess Diana to the list of memorable beauties. It was her nose that made her different.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think she's very intelligent. I think that is why she comes off as so vacant. She's beautiful and has a famous family so she doesn't have to try though.

She's plain. I agree that she's vacant.
She's tall enough, skinny and famous. That makes you a model these days.

Very plain and forgettable. She has the same dead eyes that Kourtney has.

Agree. Do not see the appeal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not that anyone cares, but I think she's very conventional looking and wouldn't be a top model without her famous family. Of course she's very pretty, but in a forgettable, almost generic way. The memorable models I can think of were very pretty but had something unusual in their features that make them instantly recognizable (Gigi Hadid, Kate Moss, Miranda Kerr, Gisele, Naomi). She doesn't have that.

no.

Thank you. I'm ambivalent about Kendall Jenner, but I really really do not get the obsession with Gigi Hadid, who at best looks like a cute sorority girl. There is nothing special about her at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she’s absolutely gorgeous.

I agree. And to compare her with her fake plastic surger-ied sisters? No comparison at all. She's incredible looking.

What? Kylie has had ALL THE WORK done too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she’s absolutely gorgeous.

I agree. And to compare her with her fake plastic surger-ied sisters? No comparison at all. She's incredible looking.

What? Kylie has had ALL THE WORK done too.

Sorry, Kendall.