Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Only start young if it's convenient and a fun activity for YOU. Keep the focus and fun and socialization rather than skill.
I had friends stressed about taking their toddlers and preschoolers to a zillion activities. Their calendars were so busy and they were always running around. We did nothing other than lots of free play until starting one organized activity for each kid in first grade. Parents taught swimming and bicycle. By late elementary school, kids asked to add or switch to another sport or dance.
Now that the kids are in middle school, there is zero difference in skill level for most things for the early starters compared to the late starters. It's important to stay active, but kids build more social skills if they get to self direct activities and learn how to problem solve in kid-led environments. I'd recommend a free and convenient neighborhood playgroup over an expensive series of classes for those reasons.
I coached for quite a while. There is definitely a difference with early vs late starters in a lot of sports. Starting late matters so parents should keep in mind if they are ok/just looking for a more recreational experience vs competition-oriented. I firmly believe that all children have potential and private lessons can train up everyone to a reasonable level but prior experience does play a part technically as well as prior conditioning. I would not start as late as middle school for something like most dance and gymnastics without accounting for private lessons to catch up. Martial arts, fencing, volleyball are all fine later as is rowing. I would do soccer earlier, too.
There needs to be a balance in time spent in organized activities and free play. Don't overschedule and turn your child into a neurotic mess who can't self-direct, either. Keep it fun. Cross-training is important, too, so don't get locked into just one sport early.