You act like Virginia is something Youngkin just acquired for Carlyle and is now looking to sell off in pieces, but I think you're quite wrong. There are few things Youngkin could do to fracture the coalition that got him elected more quickly than turning a blind eye to the "mama bear/papa bear" types, and that group cares a great deal about reversing the anti-meritocratic trends in public education. |
He is not eligible for re-election until 2029, by which time Virginia will have changed remarkably. It does not matter if he fractures that coalition. What matters to him is that a) he relieves taxes and regulations on businesses and wealthy people, and b) rigs future elections so that they will turn in favor of the next Republican candidate. |
+1. The goal is to no longer need the mama and papa bears. Republicans are not interested in solving perceived issues in public education - they are interested in DEFUNDING and ELIMINATING public education. |
I think that part of the problem is that too many Democrats aren't smart enough to think abstractly. As a result, we end up with these concrete associations, like Democrat = {science, education, human rights}, which end up defeating all of the above by imbuing them a political polarity. On one hand, it ends up spawning an organic resistance to the previously uncontroversial, because now its political. On the other, those institutions lose influence because although their premises are neutral and universal, they're now harder to separate from the motives of political cliques. It plays out as an increasingly divisive society. |
Counterpoint: The problem is that too many people don’t understand the ultimate aims of political actors and how they go about getting what they want. Nice thinkpiece though. |
within your local school silly to ensure greater diversity |
Doubt it. They talk about vouchers and defunding public education in the same way that Democrats talk about defunding the police. It’s a way to suggest that institutions that aren’t delivering services effectively or fairly need serious reform. And the last several years have shown Democrats are incompetent, bumbling hypocrites when it comes to running and overseeing public schools. |
Completely disagree. I think you are correct about a very small percentage of reasonable Republicans, but when the vast majority of Republicans/conservatives talk about "defunding" something, they are talking about reducing the public funds available for it to literally zero. See: Planned Parenthood. |
I think it's the exact opposite, with a very small percentage of Republicans wanting to reduce public funding for education to "literally zero" and the majority invested in public education (more so, in fact, than the Democratic elites who dominate private school enrollment in coastal areas) and wishing to refocus public schools on core academics. In any case, the Democrats in charge of school systems like FCPS are running them into the ground, so change needs to occur soon. |