Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the "he stole her" in video from is even creepier, if that is possible.

https://bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.social/post/3lv5cakzgpc22

Can some reporter please ask Trump why he didn’t think it was weird that Epstein, WHO DIDN’T OWN A HOTEL OR SPA, was poaching his employees?

[Anonymous]

What is the White House worried about right now?
That this controversy might affect "crowd size."

Not potential pedophilia in the White House.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does anyone believe a word he says? Like, Oh, I se -- it was because he poached his employees. Oh brother. The man in is a complete and total liar. Do you think he's going to tell you the truth about his pedophile friend and neighbor? Obviously not! It's like when someone is convicted of murder and people who knew them are upset because they lied. Well of course they lied -- they're murderers. What do you expect?

Trump is a liar. He was friends with a child rapist and did nothing to stop it. He should be in jail with Ghislaine Maxwell.

I could see getting upset when someone poaches your top salesman or raids your executives who have been with you for years, but a teenage massage therapist who isn’t even a certified massage therapist and she mostly took care of the towels and rooms, did a lot of prep work. She hadn’t graduated from high school yet. It’s like Epstein stealing the high schooler who empties the trash part-time on weekends. Very low value and easily replaced. They aren’t the type of jobs you end a fifteen year close friendship over. Trump lies and lies and lies..

This exactly. In reality/normal situations, someone else manages the spa and Trump would barely even know those employees, especially teenage part-timers. Certainly would not end a close friendship over her.

If 2 wealthy businessmen got in a huge fight over my teenage daughter working for them, I would be extremely alarmed.

Yes, he needs to explain why a teenage towel girl was on his radar at all.

This is actually a really good point. CEOs etc would have no clue about someone so low on the totem pole of an organization.

Trump told Michael Cohen that he wanted “that piece of ass” [Cohen’s then 15 year old daughter] when he saw her walking off a tennis court at one of his clubs.

Pretty teenage girls who worked at MAL would have been on Trump’s radar even if he didn’t know their names or what duties their jobs entailed..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Epstein outrage is over. MAGA decided the liberal WSJ reporting was fake news so now it's all good not to release the files.

"On Capitol Hill today, Senate Democrats – led by minority leader Chuck Schumer – will hold a press conference at 12pm ET to discuss their plans to push the justice department to release the full and un-redacted Epstein files.

Democrats are using a rare and little-known law, known colloquially as the “rule of five”, which requires government agencies to provide relevant information if at least five members of the committee request it. In this case, all Democrats on the homeland security and governmental affairs committee signed a letter to attorney general Pam Bondi yesterday."

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2025/jul/30/trump-administration-judges-epstein-witness-testimony-us-politics-latest-updates-news

MAGA's heads will explode when Trump opposes this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does anyone believe a word he says? Like, Oh, I se -- it was because he poached his employees. Oh brother. The man in is a complete and total liar. Do you think he's going to tell you the truth about his pedophile friend and neighbor? Obviously not! It's like when someone is convicted of murder and people who knew them are upset because they lied. Well of course they lied -- they're murderers. What do you expect?

Trump is a liar. He was friends with a child rapist and did nothing to stop it. He should be in jail with Ghislaine Maxwell.

I could see getting upset when someone poaches your top salesman or raids your executives who have been with you for years, but a teenage massage therapist who isn’t even a certified massage therapist and she mostly took care of the towels and rooms, did a lot of prep work. She hadn’t graduated from high school yet. It’s like Epstein stealing the high schooler who empties the trash part-time on weekends. Very low value and easily replaced. They aren’t the type of jobs you end a fifteen year close friendship over. Trump lies and lies and lies..

This exactly. In reality/normal situations, someone else manages the spa and Trump would barely even know those employees, especially teenage part-timers. Certainly would not end a close friendship over her.

If 2 wealthy businessmen got in a huge fight over my teenage daughter working for them, I would be extremely alarmed.

Yes, he needs to explain why a teenage towel girl was on his radar at all.

This is actually a really good point. CEOs etc would have no clue about someone so low on the totem pole of an organization.

Trump told Michael Cohen that he wanted “that piece of ass” [Cohen’s then 15 year old daughter] when he saw her walking off a tennis court at one of his clubs.

Pretty teenage girls who worked at MAL would have been on Trump’s radar even if he didn’t know their names or what duties their jobs entailed..

And Trumps on camera with Howard Stern admitting he's a sexual predator. He looks please about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Epstein outrage is over. MAGA decided the liberal WSJ reporting was fake news so now it's all good not to release the files.

"On Capitol Hill today, Senate Democrats – led by minority leader Chuck Schumer – will hold a press conference at 12pm ET to discuss their plans to push the justice department to release the full and un-redacted Epstein files.

Democrats are using a rare and little-known law, known colloquially as the “rule of five”, which requires government agencies to provide relevant information if at least five members of the committee request it. In this case, all Democrats on the homeland security and governmental affairs committee signed a letter to attorney general Pam Bondi yesterday."

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2025/jul/30/trump-administration-judges-epstein-witness-testimony-us-politics-latest-updates-news

MAGA's heads will explode when Trump opposes this.

lol Chuck Schumer? Sure dude!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the "he stole her" in video from is even creepier, if that is possible.

https://bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.social/post/3lv5cakzgpc22

He keeps doing this thing where he says he doesn’t know or doesn’t want to answer then launches into an answer. I think he has been told not to answer questions on certain topics but in the moment is like eff it, I’m the president and I’m answering.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Epstein outrage is over. MAGA decided the liberal WSJ reporting was fake news so now it's all good not to release the files.

"On Capitol Hill today, Senate Democrats – led by minority leader Chuck Schumer – will hold a press conference at 12pm ET to discuss their plans to push the justice department to release the full and un-redacted Epstein files.

Democrats are using a rare and little-known law, known colloquially as the “rule of five”, which requires government agencies to provide relevant information if at least five members of the committee request it. In this case, all Democrats on the homeland security and governmental affairs committee signed a letter to attorney general Pam Bondi yesterday."

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2025/jul/30/trump-administration-judges-epstein-witness-testimony-us-politics-latest-updates-news

MAGA's heads will explode when Trump opposes this.

lol Chuck Schumer? Sure dude!

I hope he opposes it. Can’t wait.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the "he stole her" in video from is even creepier, if that is possible.

https://bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.social/post/3lv5cakzgpc22

He keeps doing this thing where he says he doesn’t know or doesn’t want to answer then launches into an answer. I think he has been told not to answer questions on certain topics but in the moment is like eff it, I’m the president and I’m answering.

Yep, they cannot keep him from going off script. Pretty sure “HE STOLE HER!” was not what they rehearsed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That wasn't even what the 2007 falling-out was over. The real story is that Epstein poached a piece of real estate out from under Trump that Trump wanted to buy.

Myth.

NOT EVEN REMOTELY a "myth"

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-and-epstein-friendship-timeline

https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/white-house-insists-trump-fell-out-with-epstein-for-being-a-creep-not-their-2019-real-estate-dispute/ar-AA1IX8CK

the falling out between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein stemmed from a 2004 real estate bidding war over a lavish Palm Beach mansion—not from moral outrage or personal misconduct, as later claimed by Trump’s team.

Here’s the breakdown:

The Property
The estate was a 6-acre oceanfront mansion in Palm Beach, formerly owned by nursing home magnate Abe Gosman.
It was auctioned off in bankruptcy court, and both Trump and Epstein were vying for it.

The Bidding War
Trump ultimately outbid Epstein, winning the property with a $41.35 million offer.
According to the property’s trustee, both men tried to undermine each other’s credibility during negotiations:
Trump reportedly said Epstein “doesn’t have the money.”
Epstein allegedly countered that Trump was “all talk”.

Aftermath and Fallout
Trump later sold the mansion to Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev for $95 million, nearly doubling his investment.
The incident reportedly soured their relationship, with Trump allegedly calling Epstein to curse him out over the ordeal.

Again, the timeline is CLEAR.

Trump called Epstein a "terrific guy" and "likes them on the young side" BEFORE the real estate blowup, and AFTER he KNEW that Epstein was recruiting teenaged girls right from Mar-A-Lago.

That was the story. But Trump came out yesterday and claimed he and Epstein fell out due to Epstein poaching MAL employees. It's on tape. Most attorneys and investigators know that the truth does not change, so one of the stories is a lie.

Yet the timeline quite clearly shows that Epstein was still at Mar-A-Lago and still being touted as a "terrific guy" by Trump for years after the "poaching" incident with Virginia Giuffre (and there were likely others). Maybe Trump was annoyed later on that Epstein cleaned out the younger and prettier ones, but the mere fact of Epstein poaching girls was never the core issue of their falling-out and the timeline reflects that.

He’s attempting to rewrite history. I also suspect Ghislane was coached last week on his story.

Question is, will MAGA buy the lies this time?

There is already far too much info already out there to establish timelines and shoot holes in any fabricated narrative. He will try to spin and peddle lies, most of us will know they are lies, but there will no doubt still be some percentage of the Trump cult who believes every word he says while denying obviious glaring established facts that contradict Trump.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the "he stole her" in video from is even creepier, if that is possible.

https://bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.social/post/3lv5cakzgpc22

It’s possible for this to be even creepier

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the "he stole her" in video from is even creepier, if that is possible.

https://bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.social/post/3lv5cakzgpc22

He keeps doing this thing where he says he doesn’t know or doesn’t want to answer then launches into an answer. I think he has been told not to answer questions on certain topics but in the moment is like eff it, I’m the president and I’m answering.

Perhaps Epstein didn’t steal them, perhaps Donald was providing young girls for Epstein to “check out”! What would you call it? Pimping and/or sex trafficking?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the "he stole her" in video from is even creepier, if that is possible.

https://bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.social/post/3lv5cakzgpc22

Can some reporter please ask Trump why he didn’t think it was weird that Epstein, WHO DIDN’T OWN A HOTEL OR SPA, was poaching his employees?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the "he stole her" in video from is even creepier, if that is possible.

https://bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.social/post/3lv5cakzgpc22

It’s possible for this to be even creepier