Travis and Taylor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm getting increasingly curious as to whether this relationship can ever live up to the hype now surrounding it. At this point it feels like if they DON'T stay together, get married (in a wedding that puts Kim & Kanye's to shame), pop out some kids to trot around, start a production company, Kelce becomes the star of a tent pole action adventure film series, and Taylor eventually runs for president, I think it's going to be feel like a let down of sorts.

And if they do break up in a few months, I think some people are going to feel, uh, disappointed. Like the PP who wants NORAD to provide a tracker for her private jet.

lol...your synopsis of what is expected of them is spot on. If there's even a wiff of anything wrong, people will have a field day. Because, you know, if a real relationship, everything is always perfect.

Because the relationship is so public. If you don't want people picking apart your relationship, don't put it on display in this way.

Honestly, this is a lesson even regular people learn. I learned to be discrete about my love life and be thoughtful about who I discussed it with, because the truth is that most people are not cheering you on and wishing you well. Plenty of people enjoy watching others screw up (it makes them feel better about themselves). So I would NEVER put my relationship on blast the way these two have. It's really asking for trouble, if you ask me.

This is not the way for most people.
Find better friends.

The point is that sharing stuff about your relationship with people *beyond* your friends who will of course support you is dumb. The regular person version of Taylor-Travis is being very public about a new relationship with coworkers or neighbors, many of whom do not have your happiness as a priority and will gleefully gossip about you or pick apart your relationship without regard for how it will impact you.

I'm not Taylor Swift's friend but wow do I know a lot about her 6-month-old relationship with Travis Kelce. I would never allow so many people who are not close friends or family know this much about my love life.

No this is not true. You still interact with your colleagues and neighbors and they are your equals. Taylor does not interact with the millions of people who click on the articles about her. Anyone close enough to interact with (outside her close family and friends) is probably an employee or similar and will obviously want to stay on her good side.

“Your equals?” We are all equals. Do you think Taylor is worth more as a human because she has more money? I adamantly disagree with that idea. It is the very basis of human and civil rights “all me are created equal”

You are so far off the plot. People on this thread were projecting about how they don’t share details about their relationship bc they will be judged after the breakup, and therefore Taylor shouldn’t either. My point was, Taylor doesn’t care what any of you think. Feel free to make your judgements about her.

DP. Thank you for your blessing to do a thing I was already doing, I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this is the same person, constantly defending her "right" or whatever to say what she wants, tells people to go away, she knows it all, she's the expert, writing screeds on her ideas and presenting them as fact, Taylor's asking for it, she's not immune to criticism, blah blah blah. All about a singer.

I think it is hilarious that you think it's one person disagreeing with you on this thread.

And obviously Taylor Swift is not immune to criticism. Even with geniuses like you caping for her.

Where did I mention anyone disagreeing with me? I was making a general observation as I read this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm getting increasingly curious as to whether this relationship can ever live up to the hype now surrounding it. At this point it feels like if they DON'T stay together, get married (in a wedding that puts Kim & Kanye's to shame), pop out some kids to trot around, start a production company, Kelce becomes the star of a tent pole action adventure film series, and Taylor eventually runs for president, I think it's going to be feel like a let down of sorts.

And if they do break up in a few months, I think some people are going to feel, uh, disappointed. Like the PP who wants NORAD to provide a tracker for her private jet.

lol...your synopsis of what is expected of them is spot on. If there's even a wiff of anything wrong, people will have a field day. Because, you know, if a real relationship, everything is always perfect.

Because the relationship is so public. If you don't want people picking apart your relationship, don't put it on display in this way.

Honestly, this is a lesson even regular people learn. I learned to be discrete about my love life and be thoughtful about who I discussed it with, because the truth is that most people are not cheering you on and wishing you well. Plenty of people enjoy watching others screw up (it makes them feel better about themselves). So I would NEVER put my relationship on blast the way these two have. It's really asking for trouble, if you ask me.

Every SO could have come to the field after they won. Always been thus for Championship games and Superbowls.
I don't completely disagree, but here's the thing. What's the alternative? The fact is they're both incredibly famous. She tried the whole "hide the relationship" thing for six years, and she even said in the Time Magazine article, she can't get those years back. It sounds to me like she's saying it's more exhausting to hide than just....live. And for her, living means being in the public eye, so that's what they're choosing. Sometimes it really is as simple as that and not all of this convoluted nonsense. We're trying to put "regular person" parameters on arguably the most famous musician since Michael Jackson, and the math's just not adding up.

Except that every player on the KC team probably has a SO, who didn't come down to the field after the game for an on-field kiss.

Still, I don't think she is trying to get publicity. I think she did it because she had to, or else be accused of causing KC to lose the superbowl by an entire city. I think she'd break up with him today if she could. I'm worried for Taylor, because he's going to end up a broke former NFL player and future Taylor Swift stalker.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm getting increasingly curious as to whether this relationship can ever live up to the hype now surrounding it. At this point it feels like if they DON'T stay together, get married (in a wedding that puts Kim & Kanye's to shame), pop out some kids to trot around, start a production company, Kelce becomes the star of a tent pole action adventure film series, and Taylor eventually runs for president, I think it's going to be feel like a let down of sorts.

And if they do break up in a few months, I think some people are going to feel, uh, disappointed. Like the PP who wants NORAD to provide a tracker for her private jet.

lol...your synopsis of what is expected of them is spot on. If there's even a wiff of anything wrong, people will have a field day. Because, you know, if a real relationship, everything is always perfect.

Because the relationship is so public. If you don't want people picking apart your relationship, don't put it on display in this way.

Honestly, this is a lesson even regular people learn. I learned to be discrete about my love life and be thoughtful about who I discussed it with, because the truth is that most people are not cheering you on and wishing you well. Plenty of people enjoy watching others screw up (it makes them feel better about themselves). So I would NEVER put my relationship on blast the way these two have. It's really asking for trouble, if you ask me.

I don't completely disagree, but here's the thing. What's the alternative? The fact is they're both incredibly famous. She tried the whole "hide the relationship" thing for six years, and she even said in the Time Magazine article, she can't get those years back. It sounds to me like she's saying it's more exhausting to hide than just....live. And for her, living means being in the public eye, so that's what they're choosing. Sometimes it really is as simple as that and not all of this convoluted nonsense. We're trying to put "regular person" parameters on arguably the most famous musician since Michael Jackson, and the math's just not adding up.

Except that every player on the KC team probably has a SO, who didn't come down to the field after the game for an on-field kiss.

Still, I don't think she is trying to get publicity. I think she did it because she had to, or else be accused of causing KC to lose the superbowl by an entire city. I think she'd break up with him today if she could. I'm worried for Taylor, because he's going to end up a broke former NFL player and future Taylor Swift stalker.

Every SO could have come to the field. Way it works for Championship and Superbowl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm getting increasingly curious as to whether this relationship can ever live up to the hype now surrounding it. At this point it feels like if they DON'T stay together, get married (in a wedding that puts Kim & Kanye's to shame), pop out some kids to trot around, start a production company, Kelce becomes the star of a tent pole action adventure film series, and Taylor eventually runs for president, I think it's going to be feel like a let down of sorts.

And if they do break up in a few months, I think some people are going to feel, uh, disappointed. Like the PP who wants NORAD to provide a tracker for her private jet.

lol...your synopsis of what is expected of them is spot on. If there's even a wiff of anything wrong, people will have a field day. Because, you know, if a real relationship, everything is always perfect.

Because the relationship is so public. If you don't want people picking apart your relationship, don't put it on display in this way.

Honestly, this is a lesson even regular people learn. I learned to be discrete about my love life and be thoughtful about who I discussed it with, because the truth is that most people are not cheering you on and wishing you well. Plenty of people enjoy watching others screw up (it makes them feel better about themselves). So I would NEVER put my relationship on blast the way these two have. It's really asking for trouble, if you ask me.

This is not the way for most people.
Find better friends.

The point is that sharing stuff about your relationship with people *beyond* your friends who will of course support you is dumb. The regular person version of Taylor-Travis is being very public about a new relationship with coworkers or neighbors, many of whom do not have your happiness as a priority and will gleefully gossip about you or pick apart your relationship without regard for how it will impact you.

I'm not Taylor Swift's friend but wow do I know a lot about her 6-month-old relationship with Travis Kelce. I would never allow so many people who are not close friends or family know this much about my love life.

No this is not true. You still interact with your colleagues and neighbors and they are your equals. Taylor does not interact with the millions of people who click on the articles about her. Anyone close enough to interact with (outside her close family and friends) is probably an employee or similar and will obviously want to stay on her good side.

“Your equals?” We are all equals. Do you think Taylor is worth more as a human because she has more money? I adamantly disagree with that idea. It is the very basis of human and civil rights “all me are created equal”

You are so far off the plot. People on this thread were projecting about how they don’t share details about their relationship bc they will be judged after the breakup, and therefore Taylor shouldn’t either. My point was, Taylor doesn’t care what any of you think. Feel free to make your judgements about her.

While that may have been your intent, you ended up stating it in a way that you didn’t mean OR you have some unconscious bias about wealth and personal value.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm getting increasingly curious as to whether this relationship can ever live up to the hype now surrounding it. At this point it feels like if they DON'T stay together, get married (in a wedding that puts Kim & Kanye's to shame), pop out some kids to trot around, start a production company, Kelce becomes the star of a tent pole action adventure film series, and Taylor eventually runs for president, I think it's going to be feel like a let down of sorts.

And if they do break up in a few months, I think some people are going to feel, uh, disappointed. Like the PP who wants NORAD to provide a tracker for her private jet.

lol...your synopsis of what is expected of them is spot on. If there's even a wiff of anything wrong, people will have a field day. Because, you know, if a real relationship, everything is always perfect.

Because the relationship is so public. If you don't want people picking apart your relationship, don't put it on display in this way.

Honestly, this is a lesson even regular people learn. I learned to be discrete about my love life and be thoughtful about who I discussed it with, because the truth is that most people are not cheering you on and wishing you well. Plenty of people enjoy watching others screw up (it makes them feel better about themselves). So I would NEVER put my relationship on blast the way these two have. It's really asking for trouble, if you ask me.

I don't completely disagree, but here's the thing. What's the alternative? The fact is they're both incredibly famous. She tried the whole "hide the relationship" thing for six years, and she even said in the Time Magazine article, she can't get those years back. It sounds to me like she's saying it's more exhausting to hide than just....live. And for her, living means being in the public eye, so that's what they're choosing. Sometimes it really is as simple as that and not all of this convoluted nonsense. We're trying to put "regular person" parameters on arguably the most famous musician since Michael Jackson, and the math's just not adding up.

Except that every player on the KC team probably has a SO, who didn't come down to the field after the game for an on-field kiss.

Still, I don't think she is trying to get publicity. I think she did it because she had to, or else be accused of causing KC to lose the superbowl by an entire city. I think she'd break up with him today if she could. I'm worried for Taylor, because he's going to end up a broke former NFL player and future Taylor Swift stalker.

Of course they were all down there. That's how it works post-AFC/NFC Championship games. They were all down there. They weren't all photographed, but they get a family pass to go on the field to celebrate with their partners. It's always been that way.

+1 Of course they are there! But who do you think the cameras are going to show-- the most famous pop star on the planet, or the punter's girlfriend?

[Anonymous]

https://www.laineygossip.com/Harvey-Weinstein-sets-his-sights-on-Blake-Lively-after-dinner-with-Penn-Badgley-at-the-Waverly/12891

[Anonymous]

The Japanese embassy released a statement weighing in on TS making it to the Super Bowl. What other celebrity has this kind of…I don’t even know ever to call it - relevance? Influence? Impact?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Look at that! Brunch Granny is an incel.

[Anonymous]

No clue who that viral man is but he’s not an incel. He says he’s married with kids.

[Anonymous]

He is over the target. Millennial and gen X women were sold a bill of goods by mass media and feminists. Taylor Swift at 35 unmarried and childless and rich isn’t aspirational, it’s sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No clue who that viral man is but he’s not an incel. He says he’s married with kids.

Cool. I can say I’m the prime minister of England.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He is over the target. Millennial and gen X women were sold a bill of goods by mass media and feminists. Taylor Swift at 35 unmarried and childless and rich isn’t aspirational, it’s sad.

She is absolutely young enough to have kids. Cameron Diaz had her first child at 47, Janet Jackson at 50, Naomi Campbell at 52, Jane Seymour had twins at 50 and so dod Adrienne Barbeau, Cheryl Tiegs had twins at 52, Brigitte Neilson just had a child in her mid-50s, Donna mills had her first at 54, Chole Sevignry, etc.... In Hollywood 34 (Taylor's age) would be a "young mom."

[Anonymous]

He’s married with two kids.