Roe v Wade struck down

post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion

◄ 1 2 3 ... 195 196 197 ... 338 339 340 ► Go

Go to page...

06/18/2023 07:42

Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

quote

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Guarantee the gaslighting dipsnits will be assuring us that no one is coming for birth control and we should rest our pretty heads…

They have proven over and over and over again that they cannot be trusted.

Oh for sure. They’re fascists. I find it funny that so many MoDeRaTeS are so eager to do the fascists’ dirty work of low level PR. I mean that’s kind of what this site can be, for all viewpoints, right?

report

06/18/2023 09:47

Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

quote

Anonymous

Where are the lawsuits.....men get better health care than women which is a violation if equal protection

report

06/20/2023 11:30

Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

quote

Anonymous

report

06/20/2023 14:01

Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

quote

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:

I think many people are going to be very sad that they did not think this through completely.

report

06/21/2023 18:18

Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

quote

Anonymous

Found on the Elong Mush thread. We’re up against censorship from one of the largest platforms on which we could organize. It is a coordinated assault on women’s rights (and human rights in general) under the auspices of “free speech” and “I’m just asking questions” right wing flavored extremism.

report

06/21/2023 18:50

Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

quote

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:Found on the Elong Mush thread. We’re up against censorship from one of the largest platforms on which we could organize. It is a coordinated assault on women’s rights (and human rights in general) under the auspices of “free speech” and “I’m just asking questions” right wing flavored extremism.

That is ridiculous but the pro-choice candidates.are going to absolutely crush it on election day with or without Elon musk and Twitter.

report

06/21/2023 19:19

Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

quote

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I think many people are going to be very sad that they did not think this through completely.

The people who wanted this wanted *this*.

They want you poor— if you’re spending $1000 to get basic medical care out of state because you no longer can get a Pap smear, you’re not donating that $1000 to causes they hate.

They want you busy— takes a whole day to get that Pap smear or mammogram? You’re not teaching your kid to read. You’re not showing up at a school board meeting to speak out against banning books.

They want you scared— they want you to think you could bleed out in a bathroom, be forced to deliver a headless fetus, watch your daughter beg for care until she dies of sepsis…because then you will believe they are powerful because there is nothing scarier than this.

report

06/21/2023 19:29

Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

quote

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They don't care. All they'll say is that older women shouldn't be having babies. If women don't go to college and they start having babies when they leave school, the maternal and infant mortality rate will be lower. Educated women are competing for what they consider to be men's jobs.

I know dead women are a feature, not a bug, for the anti-abortion group, but looking at the uptick even in young women should give some of them pause…

Should, but won’t. I mean it when I say that women aren’t people in the GOP. They don’t care.

This is 100% correct. Women are dispensable vessels and if they die from childbirth, that’s their fate. they are not people. They are livestock.

+1 Y'all cain't take away mah freedom.

Do shut up. You aren't funny.

report

06/21/2023 21:26

Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

quote

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:

Read this tidbit from that article -- any anti-abortionists brave enough comment? Do you not care that these bans are going to impact women's access to health care in the states that enact them? Be honest now.

In February, a group of students, residents and faculty surveyed 2,063 licensed and trainee physicians and found that 82 percent want to work or train in states that retain abortion access—and 76 percent would refuse to apply in states that restrict it. (The respondents worked in a mix of specialties; for those whose work would include performing abortions, the proportion intending to work where it remains legal soared above 99 percent.)

Then in April, a study from the Association of American Medical Colleges drawing on the first round of applications to residency programs after Dobbs found that ob-gyn applications in states with abortion restrictions sank by 10 percent compared to the previous year. Applications to all ob-gyn programs dropped by 5 percent. (Nationwide, all applications to residency went down 2 percent from 2021 to 2022.)

Last month, two preliminary pieces of research presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists uncovered more perturbations. In Texas—where the restrictive law SB8 went into effect in September 2021, nine months before Dobbs—a multi-year upward trend in applications to ob-gyn residency slowed after the law passed. And in an unrelated national survey, 77 percent of 494 third- and fourth-year medical students said that abortion restrictions would affect where they applied to residency, while 58 percent said they were unlikely to apply to states with a ban.