Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So how does this play out when they indict him? And if he is eventually convicted? House arrest? Exile? Can we deport him to stand trial at The Hague for other stuff he might be tried for?

He will eventually take a plea and pay a fine. No jail time.

Haha, hahahaha. As if Mr. Coup d’etat will ever admit fault.

Recall that Trump ponied up $25million to settle the Trump University lawsuit right as he took office. When it comes down to it, he is transactional. He'll take the plea with certain assurances , pay a fine, and live the rest of his days at Mar A Lago, which is what he wants to do anyway.

A trial would be a disaster. The GOP knows this, and deep down, so does Trump.

Civil lawsuits are not criminal prosecutions. He has never plead guilty to anything as far as I am aware. And he’d have to be offered a deal in the first place—highly unlikely!!

Trump will never see the inside of a federal penitentiary, even if convicted by a jury of his peers. He after all is a former president. Could he be subjected to a type of home confinement? More likely. The wildcard is where the grand juries investigating Jan 6 and Georgia election rigging are headed.

I’d be fine if the USG bought him a private island to live out his days with his family. Hotel California type arrangement.

Little St. James seems singularly appropriate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So how does this play out when they indict him? And if he is eventually convicted? House arrest? Exile? Can we deport him to stand trial at The Hague for other stuff he might be tried for?

He will eventually take a plea and pay a fine. No jail time.

Haha, hahahaha. As if Mr. Coup d’etat will ever admit fault.

Recall that Trump ponied up $25million to settle the Trump University lawsuit right as he took office. When it comes down to it, he is transactional. He'll take the plea with certain assurances , pay a fine, and live the rest of his days at Mar A Lago, which is what he wants to do anyway.

A trial would be a disaster. The GOP knows this, and deep down, so does Trump.

Civil lawsuits are not criminal prosecutions. He has never plead guilty to anything as far as I am aware. And he’d have to be offered a deal in the first place—highly unlikely!!

Trump will never see the inside of a federal penitentiary, even if convicted by a jury of his peers. He after all is a former president. Could he be subjected to a type of home confinement? More likely. The wildcard is where the grand juries investigating Jan 6 and Georgia election rigging are headed.

I’d be fine if the USG bought him a private island to live out his days with his family. Hotel California type arrangement.

Little St. James seems singularly appropriate.

Ha, it just hit the market!

[Anonymous]

Looking forward to tonight’s reply brief in which Trump argues “when you’re a star, they let you do it; you can do anything.”!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another Trump lawyer gets rewarded with ETTD.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/31/days-before-mar-a-lago-subpoena-trump-lawyer-claimed-she-scoured-trumps-office-closets-00054369

Holy crap so if she actually searched everywhere she said she did she would have seen all the classified documents.

She claimed that the documents were planted in an interview somewhere. That’s the defense she’s going with. Good luck to her.

She doesn't seem to fully appreciate the gravity of the situation. She thinks the Espionage Act is "mundane."

Wow! Some people are doubling down on the party line they were given a few weeks ago. Too late! And "mundane" statutes... and then she says espionage?

And "obstruction of justice". She mentioned that one too... a trivial little thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a lawyer. But this looks like the DoJ really knows what it’s doing and Trump’s lawyers have no clue. Even from the outside, it looks like a serious talent mismatch.

Maybe you are seeing what is portrayed to you?

Please name one thing Trump's lawyers have done right.

And again, the point is missed. How would I know and how would you know? Your media sources? Mine? I have made no decisions yet.

+1. Neither Trump nor the DOJ (as it relates to Trump) are credible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a lawyer. But this looks like the DoJ really knows what it’s doing and Trump’s lawyers have no clue. Even from the outside, it looks like a serious talent mismatch.

Maybe you are seeing what is portrayed to you?

Please name one thing Trump's lawyers have done right.

And again, the point is missed. How would I know and how would you know? Your media sources? Mine? I have made no decisions yet.

+1. Neither Trump nor the DOJ (as it relates to Trump) are credible.

So much for "back the blue" right?

I guess you only back the blue when they are shooting people of color in the back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another Trump lawyer gets rewarded with ETTD.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/31/days-before-mar-a-lago-subpoena-trump-lawyer-claimed-she-scoured-trumps-office-closets-00054369

Holy crap so if she actually searched everywhere she said she did she would have seen all the classified documents.

She claimed that the documents were planted in an interview somewhere. That’s the defense she’s going with. Good luck to her.

She doesn't seem to fully appreciate the gravity of the situation. She thinks the Espionage Act is "mundane."

I’m not sure what word she actually meant (possibly “arcane”?), but it’s pretty clear she doesn’t know the meaning of “mundane.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So how does this play out when they indict him? And if he is eventually convicted? House arrest? Exile? Can we deport him to stand trial at The Hague for other stuff he might be tried for?

He will eventually take a plea and pay a fine. No jail time.

Haha, hahahaha. As if Mr. Coup d’etat will ever admit fault.

Recall that Trump ponied up $25million to settle the Trump University lawsuit right as he took office. When it comes down to it, he is transactional. He'll take the plea with certain assurances , pay a fine, and live the rest of his days at Mar A Lago, which is what he wants to do anyway.

A trial would be a disaster. The GOP knows this, and deep down, so does Trump.

Civil lawsuits are not criminal prosecutions. He has never plead guilty to anything as far as I am aware. And he’d have to be offered a deal in the first place—highly unlikely!!

Trump will never see the inside of a federal penitentiary, even if convicted by a jury of his peers. He after all is a former president. Could he be subjected to a type of home confinement? More likely. The wildcard is where the grand juries investigating Jan 6 and Georgia election rigging are headed.

I’d be fine if the USG bought him a private island to live out his days with his family. Hotel California type arrangement.

Little St. James seems singularly appropriate.

Alcatraz would be better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So how does this play out when they indict him? And if he is eventually convicted? House arrest? Exile? Can we deport him to stand trial at The Hague for other stuff he might be tried for?

He will eventually take a plea and pay a fine. No jail time.

Haha, hahahaha. As if Mr. Coup d’etat will ever admit fault.

Recall that Trump ponied up $25million to settle the Trump University lawsuit right as he took office. When it comes down to it, he is transactional. He'll take the plea with certain assurances , pay a fine, and live the rest of his days at Mar A Lago, which is what he wants to do anyway.

A trial would be a disaster. The GOP knows this, and deep down, so does Trump.

Civil lawsuits are not criminal prosecutions. He has never plead guilty to anything as far as I am aware. And he’d have to be offered a deal in the first place—highly unlikely!!

Trump will never see the inside of a federal penitentiary, even if convicted by a jury of his peers. He after all is a former president. Could he be subjected to a type of home confinement? More likely. The wildcard is where the grand juries investigating Jan 6 and Georgia election rigging are headed.

I’d be fine if the USG bought him a private island to live out his days with his family. Hotel California type arrangement.

Little St. James seems singularly appropriate.

Alcatraz would be better.

Too cruel and unusual for visiting tourists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another Trump lawyer gets rewarded with ETTD.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/31/days-before-mar-a-lago-subpoena-trump-lawyer-claimed-she-scoured-trumps-office-closets-00054369

Holy crap so if she actually searched everywhere she said she did she would have seen all the classified documents.

She claimed that the documents were planted in an interview somewhere. That’s the defense she’s going with. Good luck to her.

She doesn't seem to fully appreciate the gravity of the situation. She thinks the Espionage Act is "mundane."

I’m not sure what word she actually meant (possibly “arcane”?), but it’s pretty clear she doesn’t know the meaning of “mundane.”

"Arcane" would also be a poor choice. Pretty sure every American understands what espionage means and why it's illegal.

[Anonymous]

I think she probably meant obscure, except neither espionage or obstruction should be obscure especially not to a lawyer. Did she actually go to law school and practice law anywhere professionally?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think she probably meant obscure, except neither espionage or obstruction should be obscure especially not to a lawyer. Did she actually go to law school and practice law anywhere professionally?

She went to Widener, which is slightly better than Cooley where Michael Cohen went.
https://www.thelist.com/617352/everything-we-know-about-donald-trumps-attorney-alina-habba/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think she probably meant obscure, except neither espionage or obstruction should be obscure especially not to a lawyer. Did she actually go to law school and practice law anywhere professionally?

You might be surprised what seems to be obscure from the standpoint of a lawyer practicing the high stakes field of parking garage litigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she probably meant obscure, except neither espionage or obstruction should be obscure especially not to a lawyer. Did she actually go to law school and practice law anywhere professionally?

You might be surprised what seems to be obscure from the standpoint of a lawyer practicing the high stakes field of parking garage litigation.

*snort*

[Anonymous]

This is the person with whom Trump reportedly has vested responsibility for coordinating all of his ongoing civil and criminal matters. Soup to nuts. Alan Garten, the General Counsel of The Trump Org, is apoplectic.