Did Hillary have a seizure?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:good analysis and slow motion


She's not well these days. So unfortunate, but I hope she gets some good care. Right now she isn't.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You people are ridiculous. Don't vote for her if you think she's unfit. Volunteer to get Trump elected. Donate money. Whatever. But this incessant spreading of lies, conspiracy theories and faux outrage is toxic.


You people are ridiculous. Don't vote for him if you think he's unfit. Volunteer to get Clinton elected. Donate money. Whatever. But this incessant spreading of lies, conspiracy theories and faux outrage is toxic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:good analysis and slow motion


She's not well these days. So unfortunate, but I hope she gets some good care. Right now she isn't.


this entire thing is an FDR-esque health cover-up
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Assessing Risk of Recurrent VTE (deep vein thrombosis)
A thorough history in a patient with thrombosis should include age at the first thrombotic event, location of the thrombosis, and presence of any precipitating or provoking conditions. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism are listed in Table 1,1,3–8 and Table 2 includes the relative risk of recurrent VTE based on risk factors.9,10 A VTE is considered provoked if transient risk factors are present. These transient risk factors are divided into major and minor categories.1,3,4 The more significant the provoking risk factor (e.g., surgery, trauma), the lower the expected risk of recurrence after anticoagulant therapy is discontinued.1,4,11 Patients with a transient provoking risk factor but no persistent risk factors do not require further testing,11–13 because these patients do not have a higher risk of recurrence than the general population.1,3 Conversely, patients with idiopathic VTE are at high risk of recurrence. One study found the cumulative risk of recurrence at one, five, and 10 years to be 15, 41, and 53 percent, respectively, in patients with an idiopathic VTE, compared with 7, 16, and 23 percent in patients with a provoked event.14 Another study found the risk of recurrence to be 4.8 percent at two years in patients with transient risk factors versus 12.1 percent in those with an unprovoked event.15

So HRC is at relatively high risk of another, after having had three so far. That is just one of her health problems. Also she is 69 years old.
http://www.aafp.org/afp/2011/0201/p293.html


This is very important. Thank you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:good analysis and slow motion


She's not well these days. So unfortunate, but I hope she gets some good care. Right now she isn't.


this entire thing is an FDR-esque health cover-up


Of course, FDR was maybe our greatest president. JFK was also quite sick and he was a great president. I'd rather have a sick person who knows their stuff and has the grit to go on despite it than an idiot who doesn't even know the basic facts a president needs to know who (of course, somebody like Obama who is both incredibly fit and smart would be ideal, but even he was not as great as FDR or JFK)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:good analysis and slow motion


She's not well these days. So unfortunate, but I hope she gets some good care. Right now she isn't.


this entire thing is an FDR-esque health cover-up


Of course, FDR was maybe our greatest president. JFK was also quite sick and he was a great president. I'd rather have a sick person who knows their stuff and has the grit to go on despite it than an idiot who doesn't even know the basic facts a president needs to know who (of course, somebody like Obama who is both incredibly fit and smart would be ideal, but even he was not as great as FDR or JFK)

I'd rather have a person who isn't a known public pathological liar.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Board-certified medicine specialist and TV personality Dr. Drew Pinsky says he is "gravely concerned" about Hillary Clinton's health, noting that the treatment she has received is "bizarre" and could explain the "weird side-effects" that people are seeing.

Ouch.


Oh, please. He said it's not that her health is a grave concern; he doesn't like the old-fashioned drugs like Armour and coumidin. He was very clear that her cognition is fine.

On the contrary, he said those special glasses she had to wear for two months were for "brain damage". Yikes!! Brain damage doesn't usually totally just go away.

Now we know the origin of her bizarre behaviors.


This pathetic media whore is an addiction specialist, not a board certified neurologist, who has never examined Clinton nor seen an PET, MRI or CT image. He is way out of his depth.

Dr. Ben Carson is also concerned about her illnesses. He is an actual board certified neurologist. But wait! You hate him, as well, don't you?


Ben Carson is not a neurologist. Neurologists and neurosurgeons are not the same. And Carson said on air yesterday that he wasn't going to diagnose either of them.

Dr. Drew Pinsky, MD is 100% correct.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Another video from after the DNC


This is not normal for Hillary. Something's wrong with her.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:good analysis and slow motion


She's not well these days. So unfortunate, but I hope she gets some good care. Right now she isn't.


this entire thing is an FDR-esque health cover-up


Of course, FDR was maybe our greatest president. JFK was also quite sick and he was a great president. I'd rather have a sick person who knows their stuff and has the grit to go on despite it than an idiot who doesn't even know the basic facts a president needs to know who (of course, somebody like Obama who is both incredibly fit and smart would be ideal, but even he was not as great as FDR or JFK)


FDR and JFK didn't have to deal with do-nothing Teabagger jackholes in Congress hellbent on shutting down government and inflicting as much havoc as possible.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Another video from after the DNC


This is not normal for Hillary. Something's wrong with her.


[/quote

Stop embarrassing yourself. Why don't you try watching the entire video. You're either incredibly stupid or incredibly dishonest. Just f*cking ridiculous.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vKWuhBhbWJA
Anonymous
She seems to suffer from dizziness quite often.
What would be the possible causes of all these incidents?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Another video from after the DNC


This is not normal for Hillary. Something's wrong with her.


[/quote

Stop embarrassing yourself. Why don't you try watching the entire video. You're either incredibly stupid or incredibly dishonest. Just f*cking ridiculous.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vKWuhBhbWJA


I'm not particularly a Hillary supporter, but the preceding post was indeed ridiculous. Glad you posted the complete video.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:She seems to suffer from dizziness quite often.
What would be the possible causes of all these incidents?


At least she doesn't have a skin disease. What is it that makes Trump's skin such a strange color? I suspect it is frequent drug use. This is well known to upset the body's chemical balance.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She seems to suffer from dizziness quite often.
What would be the possible causes of all these incidents?


At least she doesn't have a skin disease. What is it that makes Trump's skin such a strange color? I suspect it is frequent drug use. This is well known to upset the body's chemical balance.

I know it can be confusing to you, but I simply asked what could possibly be the cause of Hillary's frequent dizzy spells.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She seems to suffer from dizziness quite often.
What would be the possible causes of all these incidents?


At least she doesn't have a skin disease. What is it that makes Trump's skin such a strange color? I suspect it is frequent drug use. This is well known to upset the body's chemical balance.


Trump is out there at least - making a fool of himself, but he's front and center. She stays out of the limelight. Furthermore, that tea clip - which shows the full incident - shows her acting very strangely. She bobs her head around - uncontrollably, I'll add - and then shifts into discussing her tea.

sorry - not a conspiracy theorist - But I am concerned about that situation.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: