Synagogue attack near Detroit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is full of unhinged and bigoted MAGAS and “moderate” Democrats. All are racist, bigoted.

What I notice are the Iran apologists and terrorist sympathizers.

Go read the “War with Iran” thread.
It’s a known fact nowadays, that Iran isn’t a threat to the U.S.

Um... a "known fact" among whom, exactly? The United States government, as well as most western countries, have designated Iran and its proxies (Hezbollah, Hamas), terrorists. But, you know that.

It’s a known fact that Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons and doesn’t pose a threat to the US.

Yet. And had we not bombed their nuclear facilities, they'd be much closer to having nuclear weapons. If you're the person who's been trolling this thread with inane questions, you really should try and educate yourself.

Does Iran have a nuclear weapon?
Iran does not yet have a nuclear weapon, but it has a long history of engaging in secret nuclear weapons research in violation of its international commitments. Western analysts say the country has the knowledge and infrastructure to produce a nuclear weapon in fairly short order should its leaders decide to do so.

The United States, Israel, and other Middle Eastern partners regard Iran as a primary threat to their interests in the region, and view its potential acquisition of nuclear weapons as a game-changing scenario to be steadfastly prevented—by force if necessary.

In May 2025, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that Iran’s cache of near-weapons grade enriched uranium had surged by about 50 percent over the prior three months. The surge put Iran just a step away from having enough enriched uranium for ten nuclear weapons, the IAEA found—prompting the United States to launch Operation Midnight Hammer.
https://www.cfr.org/articles/what-are-irans-nuclear-and-missile-capabilities

So, is the current war on Iran, a positive and beneficial development?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is full of unhinged and bigoted MAGAS and “moderate” Democrats. All are racist, bigoted.

What I notice are the Iran apologists and terrorist sympathizers.

Go read the “War with Iran” thread.
It’s a known fact nowadays, that Iran isn’t a threat to the U.S.

Um... a "known fact" among whom, exactly? The United States government, as well as most western countries, have designated Iran and its proxies (Hezbollah, Hamas), terrorists. But, you know that.

It’s a known fact that Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons and doesn’t pose a threat to the US.

Yet. And had we not bombed their nuclear facilities, they'd be much closer to having nuclear weapons. If you're the person who's been trolling this thread with inane questions, you really should try and educate yourself.

Does Iran have a nuclear weapon?
Iran does not yet have a nuclear weapon, but it has a long history of engaging in secret nuclear weapons research in violation of its international commitments. Western analysts say the country has the knowledge and infrastructure to produce a nuclear weapon in fairly short order should its leaders decide to do so.

The United States, Israel, and other Middle Eastern partners regard Iran as a primary threat to their interests in the region, and view its potential acquisition of nuclear weapons as a game-changing scenario to be steadfastly prevented—by force if necessary.

In May 2025, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that Iran’s cache of near-weapons grade enriched uranium had surged by about 50 percent over the prior three months. The surge put Iran just a step away from having enough enriched uranium for ten nuclear weapons, the IAEA found—prompting the United States to launch Operation Midnight Hammer.
https://www.cfr.org/articles/what-are-irans-nuclear-and-missile-capabilities

So, is the current war on Iran, a positive and beneficial development?

Yep.

[Anonymous]

I found Michigan terrorist Ayman Mohamad Ghazali’s Facebook page, and it turns out he was a big fan of Hezbollah and former IRGC head Qasem Soleimani. Ghazali posted videos of Hezbollah’s Soleimani memorial in Lebanon after Trump took him out.

Last Saturday I interviewed a guy wearing a Hezbollah bandana outside the White House. He was also flying an Islamic Republic of Iran flag and had a military-style backpack.

Something very bad is happening, but I trust President Trump to fix it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is full of unhinged and bigoted MAGAS and “moderate” Democrats. All are racist, bigoted.

What I notice are the Iran apologists and terrorist sympathizers.

Go read the “War with Iran” thread.
It’s a known fact nowadays, that Iran isn’t a threat to the U.S.

Um... a "known fact" among whom, exactly? The United States government, as well as most western countries, have designated Iran and its proxies (Hezbollah, Hamas), terrorists. But, you know that.

It’s a known fact that Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons and doesn’t pose a threat to the US.

Yet. And had we not bombed their nuclear facilities, they'd be much closer to having nuclear weapons. If you're the person who's been trolling this thread with inane questions, you really should try and educate yourself.

Does Iran have a nuclear weapon?
Iran does not yet have a nuclear weapon, but it has a long history of engaging in secret nuclear weapons research in violation of its international commitments. Western analysts say the country has the knowledge and infrastructure to produce a nuclear weapon in fairly short order should its leaders decide to do so.

The United States, Israel, and other Middle Eastern partners regard Iran as a primary threat to their interests in the region, and view its potential acquisition of nuclear weapons as a game-changing scenario to be steadfastly prevented—by force if necessary.

In May 2025, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that Iran’s cache of near-weapons grade enriched uranium had surged by about 50 percent over the prior three months. The surge put Iran just a step away from having enough enriched uranium for ten nuclear weapons, the IAEA found—prompting the United States to launch Operation Midnight Hammer.
https://www.cfr.org/articles/what-are-irans-nuclear-and-missile-capabilities

So, is the current war on Iran, a positive and beneficial development?

Yep.

+1
It certainly will be if it affects a regime change and destruction of any nuclear capabilities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The guy fits the very definition of someone seeking revenge for what was done to his own family.

How weird that he suddenly decided to do this within DAYS of his family being slaughtered. Can they find any evidence of him planning this BEFORE his own family was killed?

You Zionists who've spent decades turning a blind eye to the terrorist state created in 1948 and has done nothing but kill in country after country after country, can go to hell.

You want every one believing anything done is either terrorism or because of useless "antisemitism" claims. The media kept lying about those two who were killed in DC being an "antisemitic" attack when the guy's god damned manifesto only mentioned what israel was doing and those two literally worked for the israeli govt. And the media did what they normally don't do: Censor a manifesto, because then Dana Bash couldn't be her usual, supremacist self pretending everything is done because of "antisemitism." You eat a slice of watermelon in front of these a-holes and the ADL marks it down as antisemitsm. Why would you have to drive to DC if it were merely about killing Jewish ppl? Are there no Jewish ppl in Chicago if his intent were "antisemitic"?

You guys have no credibility at all because you want to be able to SLAUGHTER with impunity and pretend you aren't monsters. Oct 7 happened because Oct 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 2023-1947 happened.

You don't get to decide when history starts. You don't get to decide who is allowed to engage in "justifiable retribution" when you ignore what came before it. You don't get to disgustingly defend a genocide post Oct 7, but expect anyone else on this planet who gets their own family killed at the hands of israel to not seek retribution. Hind Rajab was slaughtered in a car surrounded by her slaughtered relatives, as were her rescuers. Why should I pretend a synagogue literally raising money for the ones who KILLED her and recruiting for more to kill little girls like her, are more deserving of compassion than this man's own family?

No one should be targeted for violence, yet I never see you scum say the same about the victims of killers the synagogue RECRUITS or raises $ for, We have to coddle literal killers and engage in revisionist history on behalf of Zionists.

+100
Americans and Israelis seek revenge with their army’s, but Arabs don’t have that same privilege. So when Arabs do anything in revenge, their labeled terrorists. It’s unfair and needs to change, but our country believes whatever the media says, so it won’t.

And, why don’t “Arabs have that same privilege?”

And you think slaughtering 140 children under 5 is a “righteous revenge?”

The current Iran is the perfect example, as to why Arabs don’t have that same privilege. The US is invading a country for having (not having) nuclear weapons.

Actually, Iran is the perfect example of why they SHOULDN'T have the weapons they want to carry out their wishes.
Currently, Iran is governed by a regime who have repeatedly, for 47 years, called for death to America and death to Israel. They think it is fine to slaughter 35,000 of their own citizens when they dare to protest. They use their terrorist proxies to attack other countries, unprovoked.
What exactly do you think they would do with a nuclear weapon if they could acquire one?
When they say what they want to do - believe them.
Iran's regime are NOT the good guys. And, anyone who supports them should be considered suspect, at best, and an enemy, at worst.

There are plenty of regimes around the world who are NOT good guys. Almost 50 years of chanting Death to America. OK? They haven’t attacked our country so why did the US attack them? These threats and accusations of nuclear power have been around since the 1970s. Iran is not a threat to the US. Trump’s biggest con yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Netanyahu has alleged for literally 30 straight years that Iran is two weeks from having a bomb. Maybe you are the special kind of idiot who wants the rest of us to continue believing the “Iran will kill us all!” propaganda, but most sane people know not to trust Israelis in general, and Bibi especially.

You mean, most sane people know not to trust Iranians or Islamic terrorist sympathizers.

Zionist terrorists are not any better.

A lamb is scared all its life of the howl of the big bad wolf when it’s the friendly shepherd that slaughters him in the end

Great so now DCUM is literally being used by terrorists to recruit. Hope you are happy Jeff. I’m not even flagging this one for deletion so everyone can see it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Netanyahu has alleged for literally 30 straight years that Iran is two weeks from having a bomb. Maybe you are the special kind of idiot who wants the rest of us to continue believing the “Iran will kill us all!” propaganda, but most sane people know not to trust Israelis in general, and Bibi especially.

You mean, most sane people know not to trust Iranians or Islamic terrorist sympathizers.

Drink up, everyone!

It’s whataboutism-o’clock again!

(Sure, most sane people also distrust Islamist terrorists … however, we’ll have to agree to disagree with your whataboutism that most sane people distrust garden variety Iranians the way they distrust Israelis. As for “terrorist sympathizers”, that term carries absolutely zero semantic value at this point since you smear everyone critical of Israel as a “terrorist sympathizer”. It’s in the dustbin of history now with “anti-semitism”, “trope”, and all the other pejoratives you’ve driven into the ground through abusive over-teach.)

It is so pathetically ironic that you are claiming “whataboutism” in the course of basically dismissing an attack on 140 American preschoolers because of the politics of an entirely different country. Talk about whataboutism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Netanyahu has alleged for literally 30 straight years that Iran is two weeks from having a bomb. Maybe you are the special kind of idiot who wants the rest of us to continue believing the “Iran will kill us all!” propaganda, but most sane people know not to trust Israelis in general, and Bibi especially.

You mean, most sane people know not to trust Iranians or Islamic terrorist sympathizers.

Zionist terrorists are not any better.

A lamb is scared all its life of the howl of the big bad wolf when it’s the friendly shepherd that slaughters him in the end

Great so now DCUM is literally being used by terrorists to recruit. Hope you are happy Jeff. I’m not even flagging this one for deletion so everyone can see it.

Israelis are now the copium class. Wait until you see all the destruction Israeli terrorists have brought upon themselves.

Pin this one too for when Israel sticks its hands out like a beggar for other countries to pay to rebuild their destroyed cities. Where the hell are all the construction workers even going to be found?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Netanyahu has alleged for literally 30 straight years that Iran is two weeks from having a bomb. Maybe you are the special kind of idiot who wants the rest of us to continue believing the “Iran will kill us all!” propaganda, but most sane people know not to trust Israelis in general, and Bibi especially.

You mean, most sane people know not to trust Iranians or Islamic terrorist sympathizers.

Zionist terrorists are not any better.

A lamb is scared all its life of the howl of the big bad wolf when it’s the friendly shepherd that slaughters him in the end

Great so now DCUM is literally being used by terrorists to recruit. Hope you are happy Jeff. I’m not even flagging this one for deletion so everyone can see it.

Israelis are now the copium class. Wait until you see all the destruction Israeli terrorists have brought upon themselves.

Pin this one too for when Israel sticks its hands out like a beggar for other countries to pay to rebuild their destroyed cities. Where the hell are all the construction workers even going to be found?

So attacking American preschoolers is a good thing you want to see more of. Thanks for clarifying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Netanyahu has alleged for literally 30 straight years that Iran is two weeks from having a bomb. Maybe you are the special kind of idiot who wants the rest of us to continue believing the “Iran will kill us all!” propaganda, but most sane people know not to trust Israelis in general, and Bibi especially.

You mean, most sane people know not to trust Iranians or Islamic terrorist sympathizers.

Drink up, everyone!

It’s whataboutism-o’clock again!

(Sure, most sane people also distrust Islamist terrorists … however, we’ll have to agree to disagree with your whataboutism that most sane people distrust garden variety Iranians the way they distrust Israelis. As for “terrorist sympathizers”, that term carries absolutely zero semantic value at this point since you smear everyone critical of Israel as a “terrorist sympathizer”. It’s in the dustbin of history now with “anti-semitism”, “trope”, and all the other pejoratives you’ve driven into the ground through abusive over-teach.)

It is so pathetically ironic that you are claiming “whataboutism” in the course of basically dismissing an attack on 140 American preschoolers because of the politics of an entirely different country. Talk about whataboutism.

I guess you can say those kids are about as much or as little American as the Americans that were actually executed in Palestine. Don't see you whatabouting about them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Netanyahu has alleged for literally 30 straight years that Iran is two weeks from having a bomb. Maybe you are the special kind of idiot who wants the rest of us to continue believing the “Iran will kill us all!” propaganda, but most sane people know not to trust Israelis in general, and Bibi especially.

You mean, most sane people know not to trust Iranians or Islamic terrorist sympathizers.

Drink up, everyone!

It’s whataboutism-o’clock again!

(Sure, most sane people also distrust Islamist terrorists … however, we’ll have to agree to disagree with your whataboutism that most sane people distrust garden variety Iranians the way they distrust Israelis. As for “terrorist sympathizers”, that term carries absolutely zero semantic value at this point since you smear everyone critical of Israel as a “terrorist sympathizer”. It’s in the dustbin of history now with “anti-semitism”, “trope”, and all the other pejoratives you’ve driven into the ground through abusive over-teach.)

It is so pathetically ironic that you are claiming “whataboutism” in the course of basically dismissing an attack on 140 American preschoolers because of the politics of an entirely different country. Talk about whataboutism.

I guess you can say those kids are about as much or as little American as the Americans that were actually executed in Palestine. Don't see you whatabouting about them.

So I’ll take that as meaning that you think the American preschoolers deserved it because of what happened in Palestine. Is that correct? And maybe you are also saying that the preschoolers aren’t actually American because they are Jewish, so attacks on them are justified acts of war. From there I can infer that your belief is that all Jews everywhere are fair targets.

Sound about right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Netanyahu has alleged for literally 30 straight years that Iran is two weeks from having a bomb. Maybe you are the special kind of idiot who wants the rest of us to continue believing the “Iran will kill us all!” propaganda, but most sane people know not to trust Israelis in general, and Bibi especially.

You mean, most sane people know not to trust Iranians or Islamic terrorist sympathizers.

Drink up, everyone!

It’s whataboutism-o’clock again!

(Sure, most sane people also distrust Islamist terrorists … however, we’ll have to agree to disagree with your whataboutism that most sane people distrust garden variety Iranians the way they distrust Israelis. As for “terrorist sympathizers”, that term carries absolutely zero semantic value at this point since you smear everyone critical of Israel as a “terrorist sympathizer”. It’s in the dustbin of history now with “anti-semitism”, “trope”, and all the other pejoratives you’ve driven into the ground through abusive over-teach.)

It is so pathetically ironic that you are claiming “whataboutism” in the course of basically dismissing an attack on 140 American preschoolers because of the politics of an entirely different country. Talk about whataboutism.

I guess you can say those kids are about as much or as little American as the Americans that were actually executed in Palestine. Don't see you whatabouting about them.

So I’ll take that as meaning that you think the American preschoolers deserved it because of what happened in Palestine. Is that correct? And maybe you are also saying that the preschoolers aren’t actually American because they are Jewish, so attacks on them are justified acts of war. From there I can infer that your belief is that all Jews everywhere are fair targets.

Sound about right?

It was literally a question of self-reflection for people like you to ponder. But again fkn narcissists can't but narcissist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Netanyahu has alleged for literally 30 straight years that Iran is two weeks from having a bomb. Maybe you are the special kind of idiot who wants the rest of us to continue believing the “Iran will kill us all!” propaganda, but most sane people know not to trust Israelis in general, and Bibi especially.

You mean, most sane people know not to trust Iranians or Islamic terrorist sympathizers.

Drink up, everyone!

It’s whataboutism-o’clock again!

(Sure, most sane people also distrust Islamist terrorists … however, we’ll have to agree to disagree with your whataboutism that most sane people distrust garden variety Iranians the way they distrust Israelis. As for “terrorist sympathizers”, that term carries absolutely zero semantic value at this point since you smear everyone critical of Israel as a “terrorist sympathizer”. It’s in the dustbin of history now with “anti-semitism”, “trope”, and all the other pejoratives you’ve driven into the ground through abusive over-teach.)

It is so pathetically ironic that you are claiming “whataboutism” in the course of basically dismissing an attack on 140 American preschoolers because of the politics of an entirely different country. Talk about whataboutism.

I guess you can say those kids are about as much or as little American as the Americans that were actually executed in Palestine. Don't see you whatabouting about them.

So I’ll take that as meaning that you think the American preschoolers deserved it because of what happened in Palestine. Is that correct? And maybe you are also saying that the preschoolers aren’t actually American because they are Jewish, so attacks on them are justified acts of war. From there I can infer that your belief is that all Jews everywhere are fair targets.

Sound about right?

It was literally a question of self-reflection for people like you to ponder. But again fkn narcissists can't but narcissist.

Tell me again why I need to self-reflect on whether or not it is bad to try to kill preschoolers intentionally? Is there something narcissistic about thinking preschoolers shouldn’t be attacked?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly southern Lebanon is being destroyed and I guess it’s asking too much of Americans to consider why that would make someone from that country feel rage. Empathy is for suckers, amirite? Brown people are collateral, always, and need to endlessly take it.

Am I supposed to feel sorry about Hezbollah terrorists being eliminated and then empathy for their Hezbollah affiliated brother trying to kill 140 American children? Give me a break.

WTF does Hezbollah exist in the first place and why was an AMERICAN synagogue holding recruitment for the IDF? Why in the hell would you allow that in a TAX-EXEMPT PLACE OF WORSHIP? This is the same half-assed crap we saw with protests outside of synagogues selling stolen Palestinian land. You tell yourselves everyone is just "antisemitic" and the media goes along w/ this BS. God forbid they actually talk about why that particular synagogue was being protested and that it wasn't just some random choice to be protested.

We're the ones who have to constantly coddled the feelings of ppl who defend slaughter. We have to beg for forgiveness and say "we don't believe in violence" while you literally get off on genocide. It's psychotic what Zionism has allowed. The goal posts keep getting moved back and forth. We're not allowed to conflate Judaism and Zionism while witnessing Jewish houses of worship use them for the most insidious causes on behalf of a FOREIGN ETHNOSTATE.

The ADL/"Stop Antisemitism" doesn't focus on Nazism running rampant within the right-wing. No, they'd rather nominate Ms. Rachel for anti-semite of the year.

If you want to use the "hezbollah" connection, then why in the hell do you think anyone should give a damn about Oct 7 when HUNDREDS of *soldiers* are treated like they were harmless little dancing flowers? Oct 6 was already the deadliest year for Palestinian children on the WEST BANK. I wonder how many of those soldiers we're supposed to mourn (killed by their own) contributed to that number?

You guys really just don't want to get into who gets away w/ being as disgusting as humanly possible and still be portrayed as victims while justifying the slaughter of those you've just decided are all evil

So I guess that is a yes - you think it is justifiable to kill 140 American preschoolers for being Jewish. Good to know.

I thought it was OK in your worldview to hit civilian targets as long as there's some argument that illegal activity was occurring inside? I mean, that's why it is OK for Israel to bomb schools and hospitals in Gaza, no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly southern Lebanon is being destroyed and I guess it’s asking too much of Americans to consider why that would make someone from that country feel rage. Empathy is for suckers, amirite? Brown people are collateral, always, and need to endlessly take it.

Am I supposed to feel sorry about Hezbollah terrorists being eliminated and then empathy for their Hezbollah affiliated brother trying to kill 140 American children? Give me a break.

WTF does Hezbollah exist in the first place and why was an AMERICAN synagogue holding recruitment for the IDF? Why in the hell would you allow that in a TAX-EXEMPT PLACE OF WORSHIP? This is the same half-assed crap we saw with protests outside of synagogues selling stolen Palestinian land. You tell yourselves everyone is just "antisemitic" and the media goes along w/ this BS. God forbid they actually talk about why that particular synagogue was being protested and that it wasn't just some random choice to be protested.

We're the ones who have to constantly coddled the feelings of ppl who defend slaughter. We have to beg for forgiveness and say "we don't believe in violence" while you literally get off on genocide. It's psychotic what Zionism has allowed. The goal posts keep getting moved back and forth. We're not allowed to conflate Judaism and Zionism while witnessing Jewish houses of worship use them for the most insidious causes on behalf of a FOREIGN ETHNOSTATE.

The ADL/"Stop Antisemitism" doesn't focus on Nazism running rampant within the right-wing. No, they'd rather nominate Ms. Rachel for anti-semite of the year.

If you want to use the "hezbollah" connection, then why in the hell do you think anyone should give a damn about Oct 7 when HUNDREDS of *soldiers* are treated like they were harmless little dancing flowers? Oct 6 was already the deadliest year for Palestinian children on the WEST BANK. I wonder how many of those soldiers we're supposed to mourn (killed by their own) contributed to that number?

You guys really just don't want to get into who gets away w/ being as disgusting as humanly possible and still be portrayed as victims while justifying the slaughter of those you've just decided are all evil

So I guess that is a yes - you think it is justifiable to kill 140 American preschoolers for being Jewish. Good to know.

I thought it was OK in your worldview to hit civilian targets as long as there's some argument that illegal activity was occurring inside? I mean, that's why it is OK for Israel to bomb schools and hospitals in Gaza, no?

This thread is about an attack on a US synagogue/preschool. Apparently you believe it was a justified act of war. Crazy.