did you know that Biden is old?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
When you watch the full video, what you will see, plain as day, is that Joe Biden sat down when he was supposed to, as Lloyd Austin went to the podium to speak. Jill was the one who didn't know what they were supposed to do. And that makes Trump and his clownish supporters peddling this BS all the more bad. |
Anonymous
| did you know that Trump is old? |
Anonymous
Honestly, I think there’s a point in old age where more weight suddenly looks more healthy than super trim. Obviously, jmo but (although in general I think ppl look better leaner) elderly people seem to need padding to me and I feel as though stouter (not obese) older folx just look more healthy. (But I have no dea what weight is actually better for them). |
Anonymous
| Pp. sorry that was off—topic! I just enjoy thinking about how upsetting it must be to him that he’s so chunky, lol! |
Anonymous
As someone who did a lot of caregiving for an elderly person with dementia, the full link doesn’t make me change my mind that he soiled himself. I will never vote for Trump in a million years so don’t come at me. But I hate how we are supposed to be collectively pretending that Biden doesn’t have dementia. It’s frankly cruel. |
Anonymous
Has anybody given Biden the "person, woman, man, camera, TV" test yet? Trump aced it, or so I've heard. |
Anonymous
| Wow. Hours of ceremony and people on here who don’t think they themselves have dementia imagine that they would look perfect, never close their eyes, understand every cue (without any rehearsal), and get everything exactly right, all while on center stage being filmed. And if someone doesn’t do that, that person must have dementia. |
Anonymous
Biden will be 82 when the next term starts and 86 when it ends. There are very few men who will both live to be 86 and do it with no cognitive decline. I’m not saying Trump is any better, but that he is even running is insane. |
Anonymous
You either didn't watch it or are lying. |
Anonymous
|
He's not just old. I know a lot of older people.
He is not all there. Yet another piece.......... Or read, if you dare, the transcript of Time magazine correspondent Massimo Calabresi and editor in chief Sam Jacobs's recent interview of Biden. It appeared the same day as Linskey and Hughes's story. This is the interview where Biden says—twice—that Russia invaded Russia. Where, immediately after saying, "I'm not going to comment," Biden says that "there is every reason" to believe Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is prolonging the war against Hamas for political gain. Then Biden says that the 19 percent increase in prices since he became president is due to "shrinkflation" and that he could "take" the Time reporter who asks about his advanced age. The weirdest moment comes when the reporters ask Biden to describe his second-term agenda. That's what we in the biz call a "softball question." And here—excuse the long excerpt, but it is necessary to grasp the full absurdity and danger of having this man continue to serve as president—is Joe Biden's response: To finish what I started in the first term. To continue to make sure that the European continent—I'll tell you, I got a call from Kissinger about 10 days before he died. And he used the following comment. He said that not since Napoleon has Europe not looked over their shoulder at dread with what Europe—what Russia may do, until now. Until now, you can't let that change. The point is that we have an opportunity to have the decisions we make in the last couple of years, in the next four years, are going to determine the future of Europe for a long time to come. And so that's why we can not let NATO fail, we have to build that both politically and economically. And militarily, which we're investing significantly. In addition to that, I am desperately focused on making sure that we deal with the… what they are calling the south now. There are going to be a billion people in Africa in the next several years. We have to, we have to be a catalyst for change for the benefit, for the, for the better, we have to help them build back better, we have to help them. We, on the climate side, have come along and we've done everything that is reasonably—and three other countries are the reason we're in the problem we're in. But what happens if all of a sudden, on the Amazon, they're starting to clear, vast swaths of land, cut down forests, etc. Back when Dick Lugar was alive, he and I started something back in the '90s, where we said—late '80s, excuse me—where we said to, in the Amazon, they said, look, if you, we’ll make a deal with you Brazil. You don't cut your forest, we'll pay you not to do it. We’ll pay you not to do it. We have to prevent— And that's why we're working so hard to make sure Angola can be in a position that they have more solar capacity than almost any place in the world, to help that whole continent. That's why we want to build a railroad all the way—with others in Europe—all the way across the continent. So that you have, you have countries that have overproduction of agriculture and some that don't have it, but no way to get a transfer. There's so much opportunity in Africa. And we have to work it. This is what we can look forward to in a second term? Working to make sure that Angola has robust solar capacity? No mention in Biden's answer of inflation, home prices, nor interest rates. Neither the border nor achieving positive outcomes in Ukraine and Gaza makes his second-term list. There's not so much as a glance in the direction of the electric vehicle boondoggle. Instead, Biden mangles a quote from Kissinger and gets lost in a story of how he and Dick Lugar paid the Brazilians not to chop down trees. https://freebeacon.com/columns/biden-slip-slidin-away/ |
Anonymous
| So do all of you Biden supporters actually believe he’s running our country at this point? He’s the textbook definition of a figurehead. |
Anonymous
I think he is running the country as much as any president is running hte country. Additionally, I trust the people he's hired and can delegate to are competent and not using this position to hurt people and line their pockets. |
Anonymous
LOL. The only person I thought was at all competent was Kirby. Until he stated that the administration was "proud" of the withdrawal from Afghanistan and that he didn't see any "chaos." He lost all credibility at that point. Mayorkas? Horrible. Blinken? Horrible. Who exactly are these people that you trust? |
Anonymous
I'll tell you what - one of the nice things about having a president who I trust, who is running the country well, is that I don't have to pay such minute attention to every person who is staffing him. It's what I longed for, the whole time Trump was in office - to be able to stop paying so much attention to every thing and every person. If I never see Stephen Miller and Steve Bannon and a hundred other grifty evil criminals in power again it'll be too soon. |
Anonymous
On this point, we disagree. And, millions of other voters also disagree with your assessment. As is evidenced by his very low poll numbers on the issues that matter. |