Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I can't believe we live in a world like this. Everyone edits photos. It's like she did something no one's ever seen before.
Agree. There was some bad photoshopping - so what? There's a lot of bad photoshopping out there. Is the AP really going to pull half their pictures? Or was their statement inaccurate?
I take it you have not followed any of the developments in this story, nor read the thread?
I've read the entire thread. I think y'all are really really nuts and I also think the news agencies are playing strange games right now. They are either lying in their reason for taking down the picture, or are setting themselves up for huge problems with other edited pictures.
I wondered this as well: what celeb pic out there which is posed like that is NOT edited? Why pull it when all other pics of all other celebs which were edited are out there?
+1 Also I don't know how their press offices work, but do wire services and other news organizations routinely distribute pics posted on their social media accounts? That's what the problem seems to be.
A family's social media account is not the same as an official "news" photo. The wire services picked up the photo because of the "Where's Kate?" hoopla and failed to ensure a family photo (that would be perfectly fine for tweaking) met their "news standards." In their haste to put out the picture, they obviously didn't follow standard protocols.
Are y'all just not paying attention and hopping in at page one-hundred-eighty-whatever without context? Honestly.
No, the press did not just pull a photo from their Instagram. Their press office posted the photo to the Instagram and then also distributed a copy of the photo to news agencies for wider publication. This is part of the problem -- these agencies then published the photos as an official release of Kensington Palace, with the context that it was taken by William earlier in the week, as evidence that the Princess was recovering from surgery. And then it was revealed that the photo was heavily edited and may in fact have been 5 months old and that major elements of the photo, including what people were wearing, their expressions, etc., may have been altered.
The news agencies followed protocol, including killing the photo when evidence of photoshopping became so overwhelming that they could no longer justifiably use the photo as evidence of what they were reporting.
I'm the pp you are quoting/answering. I asked about how the photo was initially pulled and how their press offices work because I hadn't seen that addressed even though I've skimmed some pages of this thread.
Having read your comment, my next thought it is: This is not amateur hour. They have some of the best people in the world working for them and none of this is coincidence. You guys can come up with your nutso theories for the next 3 weeks, but you will not know what is going on with Kate and the royal family until they want you to know. And you need to accept that it may be never.
In the meantime, leave the woman alone. We don't know her condition, but she owes you people nothing. Even if she were taking a break (with no medical issue) I wouldn't blame her at all. She has done her duty, kept a stiff upper lip for 20 years now, birthed three children even though she suffers with hyperemesis gravidarum, has recently lost the beloved Queen with whom she had a strong relationship and is dealing wither her father-in-law's diagnosis.
Some of the outrageous, mean-spirited, speculative nonsense on this thread is appalling. And I say this as someone who doesn't follow RF at all, unless something major happens.
Signed,
regular woman/wife/mom in solidarity with Kate