Susan Collins is in trouble

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate Susan Collins. I hope she loses big!

I love her and wish her continued success.

Luckily retired senators tend to do very well for themselves. Hey maybe Bart I LOVE BEER O'K will give her a clerkship in exchange for her support.

Maybe HRC can give her tips. After all, she knows what it's like to be "dead broke" and then wealthy.

Hey so does Bart O'Beer! Who paid off his debts anyway?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate Susan Collins. I hope she loses big!

I love her and wish her continued success.

Luckily retired senators tend to do very well for themselves. Hey maybe Bart I LOVE BEER O'K will give her a clerkship in exchange for her support.

Maybe HRC can give her tips. After all, she knows what it's like to be "dead broke" and then wealthy.

So does Trump.

[Anonymous]

I'll certainly donate to her campaign. And, I have NEVER donated to any politician before.
She gave a great speech on the Senate floor following the Kavanaugh hearing. Thank goodness there are reasonable, smart people left in the Senate. She is certainly one of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'll certainly donate to her campaign. And, I have NEVER donated to any politician before.
She gave a great speech on the Senate floor following the Kavanaugh hearing. Thank goodness there are reasonable, smart people left in the Senate. She is certainly one of them.

+1

Best and bravest speech of our times.

She will be reelected, and crybabies will cry.

[Anonymous]

she is either incredibly naive or a liar, not brave

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'll certainly donate to her campaign. And, I have NEVER donated to any politician before.
She gave a great speech on the Senate floor following the Kavanaugh hearing. Thank goodness there are reasonable, smart people left in the Senate. She is certainly one of them.

+1

Best and bravest speech of our times.

She will be reelected, and crybabies will cry.

lol. let's see the receipts of your donations.


she might be reelected but her odds keep getting worse, and voting for the sexual harasser who wants to restrict abortion didn't help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:she is either incredibly naive or a liar, not brave

She thought it was a brave thing, to stand as a woman, in defense of BK.

I think she made a grave error because the man she sincerely thought was all right, was not all right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:she is either incredibly naive or a liar, not brave

What a stupid comment. You can be both naive and brave. In fact those two often go together.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:she is either incredibly naive or a liar, not brave

She thought it was a brave thing, to stand as a woman, in defense of BK.

I think she made a grave error because the man she sincerely thought was all right, was not all right.

I don't think she thought it was brave. I think she thought it was politically expedient.

She is not a stupid person, and she cannot have believed that voting yes on BK was fulfilling her promise to Maine citizens that she wouldn't confirm a justice who wants to trash Roe. That's even leaving aside the rest of it. She must just have believed she was powerful enough to withstand blowback, and that the trouble of not voting for him would be worse for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:she is either incredibly naive or a liar, not brave

She thought it was a brave thing, to stand as a woman, in defense of BK.

I think she made a grave error because the man she sincerely thought was all right, was not all right.

I don't think she thought it was brave. I think she thought it was politically expedient.

She is not a stupid person, and she cannot have believed that voting yes on BK was fulfilling her promise to Maine citizens that she wouldn't confirm a justice who wants to trash Roe. That's even leaving aside the rest of it. She must just have believed she was powerful enough to withstand blowback, and that the trouble of not voting for him would be worse for her.

Agree. It was a good speech but in the real world, her vote was wrong. And it's costing her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:she is either incredibly naive or a liar, not brave

She thought it was a brave thing, to stand as a woman, in defense of BK.

I think she made a grave error because the man she sincerely thought was all right, was not all right.

I don't think she thought it was brave. I think she thought it was politically expedient.

She is not a stupid person, and she cannot have believed that voting yes on BK was fulfilling her promise to Maine citizens that she wouldn't confirm a justice who wants to trash Roe. That's even leaving aside the rest of it. She must just have believed she was powerful enough to withstand blowback, and that the trouble of not voting for him would be worse for her.

She walked through every step of the confirmation process. She talked about our justice system. Unfortunately, Dems no longer need evidence--only accusations to convict a person. And, just look at the latest disaster in the NYT. Two key things from that book--Leland Keyser stood firm even though she felt she was under great pressure from friends, and the latest "victim" refused to talk to press and told friends that she had no recollection of the event Stiers described. Pretty significant facts to be left out of a newspaper--even in an op-ed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate Susan Collins. I hope she loses big!

I love her and wish her continued success.

Luckily retired senators tend to do very well for themselves. Hey maybe Bart I LOVE BEER O'K will give her a clerkship in exchange for her support.

Maybe HRC can give her tips. After all, she knows what it's like to be "dead broke" and then wealthy.

So does Trump.

Great! a bi-partisan get together about how to overcome debt!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:she is either incredibly naive or a liar, not brave

She thought it was a brave thing, to stand as a woman, in defense of BK.

I think she made a grave error because the man she sincerely thought was all right, was not all right.

I don't think she thought it was brave. I think she thought it was politically expedient.

She is not a stupid person, and she cannot have believed that voting yes on BK was fulfilling her promise to Maine citizens that she wouldn't confirm a justice who wants to trash Roe. That's even leaving aside the rest of it. She must just have believed she was powerful enough to withstand blowback, and that the trouble of not voting for him would be worse for her.

She walked through every step of the confirmation process. She talked about our justice system. Unfortunately, Dems no longer need evidence--only accusations to convict a person. And, just look at the latest disaster in the NYT. Two key things from that book--Leland Keyser stood firm even though she felt she was under great pressure from friends, and the latest "victim" refused to talk to press and told friends that she had no recollection of the event Stiers described. Pretty significant facts to be left out of a newspaper--even in an op-ed.

Well that non sequitur certainly should reassure Maine voters concerned about Roe

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:she is either incredibly naive or a liar, not brave

She thought it was a brave thing, to stand as a woman, in defense of BK.

I think she made a grave error because the man she sincerely thought was all right, was not all right.

I don't think she thought it was brave. I think she thought it was politically expedient.

She is not a stupid person, and she cannot have believed that voting yes on BK was fulfilling her promise to Maine citizens that she wouldn't confirm a justice who wants to trash Roe. That's even leaving aside the rest of it. She must just have believed she was powerful enough to withstand blowback, and that the trouble of not voting for him would be worse for her.

She walked through every step of the confirmation process. She talked about our justice system. Unfortunately, Dems no longer need evidence--only accusations to convict a person. And, just look at the latest disaster in the NYT. Two key things from that book--Leland Keyser stood firm even though she felt she was under great pressure from friends, and the latest "victim" refused to talk to press and told friends that she had no recollection of the event Stiers described. Pretty significant facts to be left out of a newspaper--even in an op-ed.

And THAT is the crux of the matter and the force against which Kavanaugh has found himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:she is either incredibly naive or a liar, not brave

She thought it was a brave thing, to stand as a woman, in defense of BK.

I think she made a grave error because the man she sincerely thought was all right, was not all right.

I don't think she thought it was brave. I think she thought it was politically expedient.

She is not a stupid person, and she cannot have believed that voting yes on BK was fulfilling her promise to Maine citizens that she wouldn't confirm a justice who wants to trash Roe. That's even leaving aside the rest of it. She must just have believed she was powerful enough to withstand blowback, and that the trouble of not voting for him would be worse for her.

She walked through every step of the confirmation process. She talked about our justice system. Unfortunately, Dems no longer need evidence--only accusations to convict a person. And, just look at the latest disaster in the NYT. Two key things from that book--Leland Keyser stood firm even though she felt she was under great pressure from friends, and the latest "victim" refused to talk to press and told friends that she had no recollection of the event Stiers described. Pretty significant facts to be left out of a newspaper--even in an op-ed.

“Lock her up! Lock her up!”