The Amish don't live in the city. What the hell do you know about the Amish, anyway? |
OMG. That is disturbing! I guess you will do the same to cats and dogs...and kids chasing after a ball in the street? Yikes. Luckily for us chicken owners we are smart enough to keep our chickens OUT of the road... They don't cross the street 'round these parts. |
I know that they don't use electricity or cars like you and I, and that they survive off locally grown fruits and veggies and their own livestock just fine. And oops...forgive me that this site says "urban." Half these people involved in this convo live in the suburbs which also don't allow backyard livestock. My point: people CAN survive anywhere even if they can't watch Real Housewives or get on the internet...especially if they know HOW. |
The Amish also rely on a close-knit community versus someone choosing to live as a hermit or in isolation. BTW, the Amish may not use electricity, but they do use kerosene and make telephone calls as long as the line is owned by the English. I think some may even use cellular since it's not actually wired into the outside world. I actually know Amish people. Do you? |
Yes, chickens rock! i had a black one and my sister had a yellow one-mine turned out to be a rooster.
"Chickens sing of poverty". "So was a tan and being very thin. Keep up with times!" +1000 That's funny,even I got it. |
I too know that, and that they can drive IN cars but not actually DRIVE them. And they don't wear color clothing, but some less-strict Amish churches/associations/communities do. And Mennonites can wear color and are much more lenient in terms of modern ways of living. I even heard some have fridges because they are powered by solar energy. SCORE for the Amish! They get it. And am I quote, friends with an Amish family, no. Have I met Amish before and conversed? Yes. So congrats, you know more Amish people than I do. But, I'm not here to argue about who knows the most Amish, and the technicalities of their lives. This is getting off topic. My point is basically, there is a community of people living in our world today, without the conveniences of modern technology, and they aren't dead. They are alive and living and also own their own chickens. 1- people CAN live off the grid and not die 2- Amish was used as an example because they are the best example of those in USA living off the grid who won't be classified as 'poor' 3- many people on this thread, i am willing to bet, live in the COUNTY and therefore are not urban but suburban therefore do not live in the city hence my example of the Amish in the first place. Sorry I even said Amish. Shit. And (this made me laugh out loud) just because someone wants chickens and is even willing to live off the grid doesn't mean they are hermits! Try not to judge others so much. |
Backyard chickens lowers property values = myth. Myth Busters should do an episode on that one. |
Wow 'anonymous claiming chickens are activities for the poors'....you are a first rate es en oh bee. SNOB. It is not flattering. |
"They will judge you, detest you, and at worst, think you are poor" Oh, the HORROR! |
Ah! I realize this was posted nearly a year ago, but OP, you are my hero! I have really been enjoying your conversations with the ignoramuses. This is keeping me up WAY too late, tomorrow is going to be a rough day! |
Food for Thought: ![]() ![]() ![]() "In the wild, chickens like to dust-bathe, turkeys fly considerable distances, and ducks spend most of their lives on water. But in poultry farms, thousands are crammed together in dark sheds, unable to express their natural instincts. They are forced to stand and lie down in their own waste, as the litter on the barn floor is never changed." Your: global-economy-with-sophisticated-chains-and-robust-markets-chickens, -turkeys, and -ducks. |
|
Really? It's for poors? Someone needs to tell Martha Stewart.
http://www.marthastewart.com/264904/backyard-chickens-for-beginners |
Don't you love it when some idiot discovers an old thread and resurrects it? Yes, it's for the poors. Did you really just hold Martha Stewart up as a barometer of taste or something? I mean, the woman is 70 years old, so I guess I can see how she might still be confusing the way she did things in the 1940s and 1950s as sophisticated or in good taste. As for the idiot posting the poultry pictures, so what? They're animals. That we eat. Who cares? |