Posters your sick of!

[Anonymous]

the poster that keeps posting about he just posted about this topic on another post. thanks i like reading your story over and over on multiple threads and i still don't feel sorry for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear "Dad of Twins",

We need to get on the ball and become more active and annoying because we are quickly losing ground here. I suggest we start by following the advice of the PP and getting a room and creating a NEW set of twins, unvaccinated, of course. And let's blog here, right no DCUM!!! It will be divine.

Love you,
Crazy anti-vaccine conspiracy woman

Newly deflated. After wading through the "Some thoughts on daycare" thread, I'm not sure that even if I worked at it, could I possibly be as annoying as the one SAHM that "pities" all the WOHM's. She's singlehandedly fanning the flames of the Mommy Wars into a raging volcano.

I'm throwing in the towel. Sorry to disappoint you, but I definitely concede.

-Dad of Twins.

I'm one of the PP's you're referring to. There's more than one person there who thinks that WOH moms are not raising their children.

Anyway, I think you're very annoying too so we're even.

[Anonymous]

This is making some funny reading on a boring Monday

[Anonymous]

The person who thinks that you can cure autism and ADHD with diet changes.

[Anonymous]

That one from Scholastic with the kitten hanging on the tree branch - "Hang in there, kitty! Friday's coming!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear "Dad of Twins",

We need to get on the ball and become more active and annoying because we are quickly losing ground here. I suggest we start by following the advice of the PP and getting a room and creating a NEW set of twins, unvaccinated, of course. And let's blog here, right no DCUM!!! It will be divine.

Love you,
Crazy anti-vaccine conspiracy woman

Newly deflated. After wading through the "Some thoughts on daycare" thread, I'm not sure that even if I worked at it, could I possibly be as annoying as the one SAHM that "pities" all the WOHM's. She's singlehandedly fanning the flames of the Mommy Wars into a raging volcano.

I'm throwing in the towel. Sorry to disappoint you, but I definitely concede.

-Dad of Twins.

I'm one of the PP's you're referring to. There's more than one person there who thinks that WOH moms are not raising their children.

Anyway, I think you're very annoying too so we're even.

Well, we hope you never find meaningful employment ever again, so we're even.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That one from Scholastic with the kitten hanging on the tree branch - "Hang in there, kitty! Friday's coming!"

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear "Dad of Twins",

We need to get on the ball and become more active and annoying because we are quickly losing ground here. I suggest we start by following the advice of the PP and getting a room and creating a NEW set of twins, unvaccinated, of course. And let's blog here, right no DCUM!!! It will be divine.

Love you,
Crazy anti-vaccine conspiracy woman

Newly deflated. After wading through the "Some thoughts on daycare" thread, I'm not sure that even if I worked at it, could I possibly be as annoying as the one SAHM that "pities" all the WOHM's. She's singlehandedly fanning the flames of the Mommy Wars into a raging volcano.

I'm throwing in the towel. Sorry to disappoint you, but I definitely concede.

-Dad of Twins.

I'm one of the PP's you're referring to. There's more than one person there who thinks that WOH moms are not raising their children.

Anyway, I think you're very annoying too so we're even.

How wonderful...now we have a mutual disadmiration club (what a shame that's not a real word).

And for the record, the comment about you not finding meaningful employment was not made by me. I'll sign my insults that I toss your way.

-Dad of Twins.

[Anonymous]

I hate the SAHM's and the WOHM's who can't stop telling each other why the other is so insecure. News flash if you are writing on a anonymous forum to prove how secure you are with you own families decision, you might have some insecurities that could be better dealt with elsewhere!

[Anonymous]

ALL the posters that are wasting my time with all the annoying nit-picky grammar BS including this very thread! STOP IS ALREADY, who cares. So tired of sifting through pages of this bickering BS in order to get to any interesting/entertaining stuff in this thread. Yeah, had to post this after a few pages, didn't get to the end of this thread. Thanks, grammar police

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ALL the posters that are wasting my time with all the annoying nit-picky grammar BS including this very thread! STOP IS ALREADY, who cares. So tired of sifting through pages of this bickering BS in order to get to any interesting/entertaining stuff in this thread. Yeah, had to post this after a few pages, didn't get to the end of this thread. Thanks, grammar police

I think you mean, STOP HAS ALREADY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People who don't realize that they're posting to a two year old thread that has been revived by a spammer.

No, these threads are revived by people who start new threads on the same topic and are told to go search for the info that's been "discussed here ad nauseum" .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ALL the posters that are wasting my time with all the annoying nit-picky grammar BS including this very thread! STOP IS ALREADY, who cares. So tired of sifting through pages of this bickering BS in order to get to any interesting/entertaining stuff in this thread. Yeah, had to post this after a few pages, didn't get to the end of this thread. Thanks, grammar police

I think you mean, STOP HAS ALREADY.

No, she means "STOP'S ALREADY."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ALL the posters that are wasting my time with all the annoying nit-picky grammar BS including this very thread! STOP IS ALREADY, who cares. So tired of sifting through pages of this bickering BS in order to get to any interesting/entertaining stuff in this thread. Yeah, had to post this after a few pages, didn't get to the end of this thread. Thanks, grammar police

I think you mean, STOP HAS ALREADY.

No, I meant STOP IT ALREADY. If you cannot guess the meaning of the sentence containing a typo, then something is seriously misfiring in your brain, OR, you are a robot. Oh wait, the spell check technology has been around for a while, definitely not a cutting age AI. So, here you go, if you cannot beat an old software technology in recognizing a typo, get off whatever you are smoking these days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ALL the posters that are wasting my time with all the annoying nit-picky grammar BS including this very thread! STOP IS ALREADY, who cares. So tired of sifting through pages of this bickering BS in order to get to any interesting/entertaining stuff in this thread. Yeah, had to post this after a few pages, didn't get to the end of this thread. Thanks, grammar police

I think you mean, STOP HAS ALREADY.

No, she means "STOP'S ALREADY."

No, I meant to say that anyone who is unable to understand the meaning of a simple sentence with a typo is a moron or high on drugs. congrats, grammar police, your brains are devolving. It's either that, or you are all just OCD bitches.