Yikes! Keep your kids away from religion (former catholic) |
There are various theories and recent discoveries that show various forms of evidence for a number of these events. Google is your friend. |
Since you claim supernatural events have evidence would you mind enlightening us? |
I didn't claim anything. Read my post and do your own research. |
I am not finding these. Can you point them out from Google? |
That's hard to believe, but I'll bite. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ancient-relic-moses-ten-commandments-found-austria-archaeology/ https://peacefulscience.org/articles/daniel-ang-a-scientist-looks-at-the-resurrection/ https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/evidence-suggests-biblical-great-flood-noahs-time-happened/story?id=17884533 https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/evidence-for-a-flood-102813115/ |
Evidence of a flood in the past does not indicate that all animals and people were wiped out and had to start again. We just had floods this week. This happens all the time. |
Take it up with the researchers/article authors, not me. |
https://peacefulscience.org/articles/daniel-ang-a-scientist-looks-at-the-resurrection/
I don't know what this proves or doesn't prove. It doesn't seem to say much other than people said it happened so therefore it must be so. What makes a lot more sense is that Jesus said he was going to rise again in 3 days and then a few people claimed it happened. This happens all the time that people act as if a prophecy is fulfilled. It just simply doesn't make sense that this fundamental part of the faith would only be revealed to a few. Even in the ten commandments, Moses came down with the commandments and was already their leader. |
That's your best defense? Evidence of local floods, and how they influenced human story telling is not evidence of a global flood that wiped out all of humanity except those that made it onto Noah's Ark. See how unreasonable you are now? Also, your one "author" is a claimed Christian who is clearly biased in his perception of the results of data. Finding one or two "scientists" who make claims does not make their claim true on its own. |
It says there was possibly a flood the size of Illinois based on evidence of an old shoreline that says nothing about the timeline of events or animals and humans being wiped out or anything related to the same area where other Jewish stories are discussed. It says that flood may be the basis of the story which was then told over generations. That's the entire article. |
The 2nd and 3rd claims presuppose that the basis for those claims are true. There is no evidence for either. Also, the belief in resurrection was not unique to Christianity in the ancient world. Several other religious and mythological traditions feature a similar theme. We don't have self-avowed "Christian scientists" trying to prove those claims. Now show that Manu or Zoroaster are not the true "god" of creation, and not the Christina god. ![]() |
We've got the Rosetta Stone, but never did find the original stones that the 10 commandments were written on, right? Terrible commandments at any rate. The first ones are all about who's in charge: The Lord thy God. |
What is the choice we need to make? Believe in him, love him, worship him or he will throw you in a lake of fire? That's not a choice, that's coercion. |
Not one educated, informed logical person thinks there was a global flood during human history or prior. In fact it is physically impossible to have happened.
The evidence of flood and flood legends is strong corroboration of the position that the bible is mere mythology, and not even original mythology at that. If you believe there was a literal global flood, despite all the evidence to the contrary, then there is no purpose in discussing it because you are in denial of clear facts. I find it hard to believe there is a whole page of a forum of adults devoted to the flood myth. I guess my participation makes me (almost) as bad! lol |