What ever happen to jeffrey epstein files ?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For all the Republicans ignoring the new info: Trump is all over the Epstein files.


Ok, can you link to the new information?

Nah. You know why? Either you got all those articles allegedly debunking Trump raping this person or that from your right wing listserv or you know how to google. So go google. Really bathe in the fact that you support a rapist.

Ask yourself why he told Stormi and the Katie Johnson the same thing: “you remind me of my daughter.” That wasn’t public in 2016 (see Trump’s felony convictions for why that wasn’t public). No, really, ask yourself why Trump had sex immediately after telling at least one woman (and potentially one girl) that she reminded him of her daughter.


Media sources used in this thread:

The Daily Beast
Huffington Post
UK Guardian
Vox
Radar Online
People magazine online
NY Magazine/Intelligencer

These sources are not conservative or right wing media sources.

You can’t add anything to accuse Trump
with from the new documents because the new information from the newly released documents were previously detailed and discussed in this thread.

The Ira Rosen allegations have been discussed above. That’s the tweet about the alleged sex tapes Epstein had of Trump. Ira Rosen is a very confident man, almost comically confident.

The “Katie Johnson” case has been discussed above, multiple times, with repeating links and information. The sources of information are all credible. They have “receipts,” as we say.

You are not discussing this topic in good faith.

I’m talking about the new information of Trump being all over the Epstein files. If you want to discuss in good faith, stay on topic and go google Trump all over Epstein files instead of inventing reasons why I shouldn’t think you got those articles disseminated to you.


+1000 Trump's name was all over Epstein's phone logs, and more and more about their close relationship keeps coming out. A lot of it was hidden and redacted. And a lot still is. We need to know the truth.


Link? Citation?


Links were already posted earlier in this thread.


I see a youtube video about the new Epstein document dump, talking about Trump leaving messages for Epstein.

Who is the youtuber, is he an investigative reporter for a media outlet? I don’t know who he is.


Does it matter? The question is, is he making it up, or is he some random person who had the time to scour the files and report his findings? If he is lying, then that is one thing, but, the documentary evidence shows he is telling the truth.

So then what?
Anonymous
There are a whole lot of reasons why Trump accusers are reluctant to come forward, and why some of the complaints have gone away. Trump has a history of silencing people using hush money and legal threats, and some of the newly released records also show that the girls that were raped were threatened with prosecution as alleged prostitutes even though they had evidence that some of them were lured under false pretenses and that some of them were as young as 14 and not the age of consent.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article289667429.html
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For all the Republicans ignoring the new info: Trump is all over the Epstein files.


Ok, can you link to the new information?

Nah. You know why? Either you got all those articles allegedly debunking Trump raping this person or that from your right wing listserv or you know how to google. So go google. Really bathe in the fact that you support a rapist.

Ask yourself why he told Stormi and the Katie Johnson the same thing: “you remind me of my daughter.” That wasn’t public in 2016 (see Trump’s felony convictions for why that wasn’t public). No, really, ask yourself why Trump had sex immediately after telling at least one woman (and potentially one girl) that she reminded him of her daughter.


Media sources used in this thread:

The Daily Beast
Huffington Post
UK Guardian
Vox
Radar Online
People magazine online
NY Magazine/Intelligencer

These sources are not conservative or right wing media sources.

You can’t add anything to accuse Trump
with from the new documents because the new information from the newly released documents were previously detailed and discussed in this thread.

The Ira Rosen allegations have been discussed above. That’s the tweet about the alleged sex tapes Epstein had of Trump. Ira Rosen is a very confident man, almost comically confident.

The “Katie Johnson” case has been discussed above, multiple times, with repeating links and information. The sources of information are all credible. They have “receipts,” as we say.

You are not discussing this topic in good faith.

I’m talking about the new information of Trump being all over the Epstein files. If you want to discuss in good faith, stay on topic and go google Trump all over Epstein files instead of inventing reasons why I shouldn’t think you got those articles disseminated to you.


+1000 Trump's name was all over Epstein's phone logs, and more and more about their close relationship keeps coming out. A lot of it was hidden and redacted. And a lot still is. We need to know the truth.


Link? Citation?


Links were already posted earlier in this thread.


I see a youtube video about the new Epstein document dump, talking about Trump leaving messages for Epstein.

Who is the youtuber, is he an investigative reporter for a media outlet? I don’t know who he is.


Does it matter? The question is, is he making it up, or is he some random person who had the time to scour the files and report his findings? If he is lying, then that is one thing, but, the documentary evidence shows he is telling the truth.

So then what?


Yes, it matters. Are you telling me the American and world media outlets have access to the same information as the random youtuber and haven’t scoured the new documents?

Why are American and world news sources not reporting on all the new, damming, information?

Don’t media outlets make lots of money reporting about Trump every second of the day?

But the random youtuber, according to you, is leading the entire world’s news and media industry in finding evidence of Trump abusing kids.

Sure.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:There are a whole lot of reasons why Trump accusers are reluctant to come forward, and why some of the complaints have gone away. Trump has a history of silencing people using hush money and legal threats, and some of the newly released records also show that the girls that were raped were threatened with prosecution as alleged prostitutes even though they had evidence that some of them were lured under false pretenses and that some of them were as young as 14 and not the age of consent.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article289667429.html


Here's the evidence in that article

Epstein befriended a host of famous and powerful people, including former presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, Nobel-Prize winners, actresses, actors, hedge fund moguls and bankers. Some of his victims allege that he and some of his friends had sex parties with girls on his private island.

Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article289667429.html#storylink=cpy


Earth shattering.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For all the Republicans ignoring the new info: Trump is all over the Epstein files.


Ok, can you link to the new information?

Nah. You know why? Either you got all those articles allegedly debunking Trump raping this person or that from your right wing listserv or you know how to google. So go google. Really bathe in the fact that you support a rapist.

Ask yourself why he told Stormi and the Katie Johnson the same thing: “you remind me of my daughter.” That wasn’t public in 2016 (see Trump’s felony convictions for why that wasn’t public). No, really, ask yourself why Trump had sex immediately after telling at least one woman (and potentially one girl) that she reminded him of her daughter.


Media sources used in this thread:

The Daily Beast
Huffington Post
UK Guardian
Vox
Radar Online
People magazine online
NY Magazine/Intelligencer

These sources are not conservative or right wing media sources.

You can’t add anything to accuse Trump
with from the new documents because the new information from the newly released documents were previously detailed and discussed in this thread.

The Ira Rosen allegations have been discussed above. That’s the tweet about the alleged sex tapes Epstein had of Trump. Ira Rosen is a very confident man, almost comically confident.

The “Katie Johnson” case has been discussed above, multiple times, with repeating links and information. The sources of information are all credible. They have “receipts,” as we say.

You are not discussing this topic in good faith.

I’m talking about the new information of Trump being all over the Epstein files. If you want to discuss in good faith, stay on topic and go google Trump all over Epstein files instead of inventing reasons why I shouldn’t think you got those articles disseminated to you.


+1000 Trump's name was all over Epstein's phone logs, and more and more about their close relationship keeps coming out. A lot of it was hidden and redacted. And a lot still is. We need to know the truth.


Link? Citation?


Links were already posted earlier in this thread.


I see a youtube video about the new Epstein document dump, talking about Trump leaving messages for Epstein.

Who is the youtuber, is he an investigative reporter for a media outlet? I don’t know who he is.


Does it matter? The question is, is he making it up, or is he some random person who had the time to scour the files and report his findings? If he is lying, then that is one thing, but, the documentary evidence shows he is telling the truth.

So then what?


Yes, it matters. Are you telling me the American and world media outlets have access to the same information as the random youtuber and haven’t scoured the new documents?

Why are American and world news sources not reporting on all the new, damming, information?

Don’t media outlets make lots of money reporting about Trump every second of the day?

But the random youtuber, according to you, is leading the entire world’s news and media industry in finding evidence of Trump abusing kids.

Sure.


I think it is pretty clear that the MSM is in the tank for Trump. No fact checking, the incessent drumbeat against Biden - the corporate ownership, whether they align with fascists, or simply want the clicks, have made it clear they are giving Trump a pass, which includes his obvious association with Epstein.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There are a whole lot of reasons why Trump accusers are reluctant to come forward, and why some of the complaints have gone away. Trump has a history of silencing people using hush money and legal threats, and some of the newly released records also show that the girls that were raped were threatened with prosecution as alleged prostitutes even though they had evidence that some of them were lured under false pretenses and that some of them were as young as 14 and not the age of consent.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article289667429.html


Here's the evidence in that article

Epstein befriended a host of famous and powerful people, including former presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, Nobel-Prize winners, actresses, actors, hedge fund moguls and bankers. Some of his victims allege that he and some of his friends had sex parties with girls on his private island.

Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article289667429.html#storylink=cpy


Earth shattering.


And, what that piece fails to outline is that Trump parted ways LONG ago with Epstein and barred him from Mar a Lago when Epstein made advances on a young woman at Mar A Lago.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/04/trump-banned-jeffrey-epstein-from-mar-a-lago-for-hitting-on-girl.html
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For all the Republicans ignoring the new info: Trump is all over the Epstein files.


Ok, can you link to the new information?

Nah. You know why? Either you got all those articles allegedly debunking Trump raping this person or that from your right wing listserv or you know how to google. So go google. Really bathe in the fact that you support a rapist.

Ask yourself why he told Stormi and the Katie Johnson the same thing: “you remind me of my daughter.” That wasn’t public in 2016 (see Trump’s felony convictions for why that wasn’t public). No, really, ask yourself why Trump had sex immediately after telling at least one woman (and potentially one girl) that she reminded him of her daughter.


Media sources used in this thread:

The Daily Beast
Huffington Post
UK Guardian
Vox
Radar Online
People magazine online
NY Magazine/Intelligencer

These sources are not conservative or right wing media sources.

You can’t add anything to accuse Trump
with from the new documents because the new information from the newly released documents were previously detailed and discussed in this thread.

The Ira Rosen allegations have been discussed above. That’s the tweet about the alleged sex tapes Epstein had of Trump. Ira Rosen is a very confident man, almost comically confident.

The “Katie Johnson” case has been discussed above, multiple times, with repeating links and information. The sources of information are all credible. They have “receipts,” as we say.

You are not discussing this topic in good faith.

I’m talking about the new information of Trump being all over the Epstein files. If you want to discuss in good faith, stay on topic and go google Trump all over Epstein files instead of inventing reasons why I shouldn’t think you got those articles disseminated to you.


+1000 Trump's name was all over Epstein's phone logs, and more and more about their close relationship keeps coming out. A lot of it was hidden and redacted. And a lot still is. We need to know the truth.


Link? Citation?


Links were already posted earlier in this thread.


I see a youtube video about the new Epstein document dump, talking about Trump leaving messages for Epstein.

Who is the youtuber, is he an investigative reporter for a media outlet? I don’t know who he is.


Does it matter? The question is, is he making it up, or is he some random person who had the time to scour the files and report his findings? If he is lying, then that is one thing, but, the documentary evidence shows he is telling the truth.

So then what?


Yes, it matters. Are you telling me the American and world media outlets have access to the same information as the random youtuber and haven’t scoured the new documents?

Why are American and world news sources not reporting on all the new, damming, information?

Don’t media outlets make lots of money reporting about Trump every second of the day?

But the random youtuber, according to you, is leading the entire world’s news and media industry in finding evidence of Trump abusing kids.

Sure.


I think it is pretty clear that the MSM is in the tank for Trump. No fact checking, the incessent drumbeat against Biden - the corporate ownership, whether they align with fascists, or simply want the clicks, have made it clear they are giving Trump a pass, which includes his obvious association with Epstein.


LOL. "In the tank for Trump." You truly are delusional.
Maybe - just maybe - they have looked into the stories and discovered there is nothing there.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For all the Republicans ignoring the new info: Trump is all over the Epstein files.


Ok, can you link to the new information?

Nah. You know why? Either you got all those articles allegedly debunking Trump raping this person or that from your right wing listserv or you know how to google. So go google. Really bathe in the fact that you support a rapist.

Ask yourself why he told Stormi and the Katie Johnson the same thing: “you remind me of my daughter.” That wasn’t public in 2016 (see Trump’s felony convictions for why that wasn’t public). No, really, ask yourself why Trump had sex immediately after telling at least one woman (and potentially one girl) that she reminded him of her daughter.


Media sources used in this thread:

The Daily Beast
Huffington Post
UK Guardian
Vox
Radar Online
People magazine online
NY Magazine/Intelligencer

These sources are not conservative or right wing media sources.

You can’t add anything to accuse Trump
with from the new documents because the new information from the newly released documents were previously detailed and discussed in this thread.

The Ira Rosen allegations have been discussed above. That’s the tweet about the alleged sex tapes Epstein had of Trump. Ira Rosen is a very confident man, almost comically confident.

The “Katie Johnson” case has been discussed above, multiple times, with repeating links and information. The sources of information are all credible. They have “receipts,” as we say.

You are not discussing this topic in good faith.

I’m talking about the new information of Trump being all over the Epstein files. If you want to discuss in good faith, stay on topic and go google Trump all over Epstein files instead of inventing reasons why I shouldn’t think you got those articles disseminated to you.


+1000 Trump's name was all over Epstein's phone logs, and more and more about their close relationship keeps coming out. A lot of it was hidden and redacted. And a lot still is. We need to know the truth.


Link? Citation?


Links were already posted earlier in this thread.


I see a youtube video about the new Epstein document dump, talking about Trump leaving messages for Epstein.

Who is the youtuber, is he an investigative reporter for a media outlet? I don’t know who he is.


Does it matter? The question is, is he making it up, or is he some random person who had the time to scour the files and report his findings? If he is lying, then that is one thing, but, the documentary evidence shows he is telling the truth.

So then what?


Yes, it matters. Are you telling me the American and world media outlets have access to the same information as the random youtuber and haven’t scoured the new documents?

Why are American and world news sources not reporting on all the new, damming, information?

Don’t media outlets make lots of money reporting about Trump every second of the day?

But the random youtuber, according to you, is leading the entire world’s news and media industry in finding evidence of Trump abusing kids.

Sure.


I think it is pretty clear that the MSM is in the tank for Trump. No fact checking, the incessent drumbeat against Biden - the corporate ownership, whether they align with fascists, or simply want the clicks, have made it clear they are giving Trump a pass, which includes his obvious association with Epstein.


I think it’s clear Trump’s alleged crimes regarding Epstein have been beaten and investigated to death.

I think the new allegations in the new documents are without merit, and any news or media outlet has investigated them and found nothing.

The same news and media outlets have been burned by reporting accusations as true before evidence has been accurately examined, and don’t want their credibility to take another hit.

Anonymous
Another thing from the recent Epstein doc release -
Phone logs, with page after page that look like this:



Trump phone calls to Jeffrey Epstein in between "massage" requests.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For all the Republicans ignoring the new info: Trump is all over the Epstein files.


Ok, can you link to the new information?

Nah. You know why? Either you got all those articles allegedly debunking Trump raping this person or that from your right wing listserv or you know how to google. So go google. Really bathe in the fact that you support a rapist.

Ask yourself why he told Stormi and the Katie Johnson the same thing: “you remind me of my daughter.” That wasn’t public in 2016 (see Trump’s felony convictions for why that wasn’t public). No, really, ask yourself why Trump had sex immediately after telling at least one woman (and potentially one girl) that she reminded him of her daughter.


Media sources used in this thread:

The Daily Beast
Huffington Post
UK Guardian
Vox
Radar Online
People magazine online
NY Magazine/Intelligencer

These sources are not conservative or right wing media sources.

You can’t add anything to accuse Trump
with from the new documents because the new information from the newly released documents were previously detailed and discussed in this thread.

The Ira Rosen allegations have been discussed above. That’s the tweet about the alleged sex tapes Epstein had of Trump. Ira Rosen is a very confident man, almost comically confident.

The “Katie Johnson” case has been discussed above, multiple times, with repeating links and information. The sources of information are all credible. They have “receipts,” as we say.

You are not discussing this topic in good faith.

I’m talking about the new information of Trump being all over the Epstein files. If you want to discuss in good faith, stay on topic and go google Trump all over Epstein files instead of inventing reasons why I shouldn’t think you got those articles disseminated to you.


+1000 Trump's name was all over Epstein's phone logs, and more and more about their close relationship keeps coming out. A lot of it was hidden and redacted. And a lot still is. We need to know the truth.


Link? Citation?


Links were already posted earlier in this thread.


I see a youtube video about the new Epstein document dump, talking about Trump leaving messages for Epstein.

Who is the youtuber, is he an investigative reporter for a media outlet? I don’t know who he is.


Does it matter? The question is, is he making it up, or is he some random person who had the time to scour the files and report his findings? If he is lying, then that is one thing, but, the documentary evidence shows he is telling the truth.

So then what?


Yes, it matters. Are you telling me the American and world media outlets have access to the same information as the random youtuber and haven’t scoured the new documents?

Why are American and world news sources not reporting on all the new, damming, information?

Don’t media outlets make lots of money reporting about Trump every second of the day?

But the random youtuber, according to you, is leading the entire world’s news and media industry in finding evidence of Trump abusing kids.

Sure.

If the life of billionaires depends on not outing themselves, yes, plenty of independent journalists will do better. Why are you this naive?

You can see the circumstantial evidence everywhere. He is rapist already. He brags about sexually assaulting women. He went backstage to look at girls changing clothes at his pageant. I mean you really have to have your head buried deep not to see all the smoke.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There are a whole lot of reasons why Trump accusers are reluctant to come forward, and why some of the complaints have gone away. Trump has a history of silencing people using hush money and legal threats, and some of the newly released records also show that the girls that were raped were threatened with prosecution as alleged prostitutes even though they had evidence that some of them were lured under false pretenses and that some of them were as young as 14 and not the age of consent.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article289667429.html


Here's the evidence in that article

Epstein befriended a host of famous and powerful people, including former presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, Nobel-Prize winners, actresses, actors, hedge fund moguls and bankers. Some of his victims allege that he and some of his friends had sex parties with girls on his private island.

Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article289667429.html#storylink=cpy


Earth shattering.


And, what that piece fails to outline is that Trump parted ways LONG ago with Epstein and barred him from Mar a Lago when Epstein made advances on a young woman at Mar A Lago.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/04/trump-banned-jeffrey-epstein-from-mar-a-lago-for-hitting-on-girl.html


False. Trump knew about Epstein hitting on young women for years and had no problem with it.

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side” - Donald Trump

The REAL reason he got in a fight with Epstein was because they were both trying to bid on a $41m mansion.

https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/the-us41-million-mansion-that-broke-up-donald-trump-and-jeffrey-epstein/news-story/7e7fa6e19d54a4a6450198cf3bbac270
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Imagine if Joe Biden's name showed up ANYWHERE in the Epstein files.

The right wing media would be pounding it incessantly.

They would!

But the “mainstream” media are deathly silent on Trump and Epstein. Why? Because, as another PP says, they’re in the tank for the GOP.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Another thing from the recent Epstein doc release -
Phone logs, with page after page that look like this:



Trump phone calls to Jeffrey Epstein in between "massage" requests.



What does this prove? Trump has a phone?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Another thing from the recent Epstein doc release -
Phone logs, with page after page that look like this:



Trump phone calls to Jeffrey Epstein in between "massage" requests.



What does this prove? Trump has a phone?


1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = ?

PP: "0"

Sorry, wrong answer. 1+1+1+1+1=5 and you are willfully obtuse and oblivious and in deep denial of serious realities.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Another thing from the recent Epstein doc release -
Phone logs, with page after page that look like this:



Trump phone calls to Jeffrey Epstein in between "massage" requests.



What does this prove? Trump has a phone?

What does it prove? That you didn’t watch the video.

Some of the info in this video:
Epstein brought trafficking victims to Trump properties
Epstein and Maxwell hunted victims at Mar a Lago
“The Look of the Year” contest
Trump wishing Ghislaine Maxwell well in her trial. That’s a weird ash thing to say about a woman who trafficked children.
Trump bragging about looking at teens changing clothes backstage at the pageant.

I tapped out around the ten minute mark but I don’t know how anyone is pretending that Trump is completely innocent. You guys went down the Qanon rabbit hole based on literally nothing at all but all of this? and you’re “um gee nothing to see here” is weird.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: